Posthuman identity and the human–animal divide in Pier Paolo Pasolini’s The Hawks and the Sparrows and Pigsty

References

1. Amberson, Deborah, and Past, Elena. (eds) ( 2014), Thinking Italian Animals: Human and Posthuman in Modern Italian Literature and Film, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barad, Karen. ( 2003;), ‘ Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. ’, Signs, 28:3, pp. 801–31.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barad, Karen. ( 2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bazzocchi, Marco Antonio. ( 2007), I burattini filosofi: Pasolini dalla letteratura al cinema, Milan:: Bruno Mondadori;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bondavalli, Simona. ( 2010;), ‘ Lost in the pig house: Vision and consumption in Pier Paolo Pasolini’s Porcile. ’, Italica, 87:3, pp. 408–27.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Braidotti, Rosi. ( 2013), The Posthuman, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, William. ( 2015;), ‘ From DelGuat to ScarJo. ’, in M. Hauskeller,, T. D. Philbeck, and C. D. Carbonell. (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, Basingstoke and New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 11–18.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cavarero, Adriana. ( 2000), Relating Narratives: Storytelling and Selfhood (trans. P. A. Kottman.), London:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chianese, Francesco. ( 2018;), ‘ The ambivalence of Julian: The paradox of fatherhood in Pier Paolo Pasolini’s Porcile. ’, Italian Studies, 73:1, pp. 66–80.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clarke, Bruce, and Rossini, Manuela. (eds) ( 2017), The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Collodi, Carlo. ( [1883] 1995), Le avventure di Pinocchio: Storia di un burattino, Turin:: Einaudi;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cronin, Michael. ( 2017), Eco-Translation: Translation and Ecology in the Age of the Anthropocene, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Deleuze, Gilles. ( 2014), Difference and Repetition, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Elduque, Albert. ( 2017;), ‘ Hungry gazes, digesting closeups: Pasolini, Porcile and the politics of consumption. ’, Screen, 58:2, pp. 119–40.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ferrara, Enrica Maria. (ed.) ( 2020), Posthumanism in Italian Literature and Film: Boundaries and Identity, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Foucault, Michel. ( 1994), The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gordon, Robert S. C.. ( 1996), Pasolini: Forms of Subjectivity, Oxford:: Clarendon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gragnolati, Manuele, and Holzhey, Christoph F. E.. ( 2015;), ‘ Active passivity? Spinoza in Pasolini’s Porcile. ’, World Picture, 10, https://doi.org/10.25620/rp-19_01. Accessed 5 May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Haraway, Donna. ( 1991), Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hassan, Ihab. ( 1977;), ‘ Prometheus as performer: Toward a posthumanist culture?. ’, Georgia Review, 31:4, pp. 830–50.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hayles, Nancy K.. ( 1999), How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago, IL and London:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Herbrechter, Stefan. ( 2017;), ‘ Postmodern. ’, in B. Clarke, and M. Rossini. (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 54–68.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hills, Alexandra. ( 2014;), ‘ Creatureliness and posthumanism in Liliana Cavani’s The Night Porter and Pier Paolo Pasolini’s Salò. ’, in D. Amberson, and E. Past. (eds), Thinking Italian Animals: Human and Posthuman in Modern Italian Literature and Film, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 111–28.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Luzzi, Joseph. ( 2014), A Cinema of Poetry: Aesthetics of the Italian Art Film, Baltimore, MD:: Johns Hopkins University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Marchesini, Roberto. ( 2014;), ‘ Foreword: Mimesis: The heterospecific as ontopoietic epiphany. ’, in D. Amberson, and E. Past. (eds), Thinking Italian Animals: Human and Posthuman in Modern Italian Literature and Film, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. xiii–xxxvi.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Marchesini, Roberto. ( 2016), Etologia filosofica: Alla ricerca della soggettività animale, Milan:: Mimesis;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Martín Clavijo, Milagro. ( 2014;), ‘ La puesta en escena del «diverso» pasoliniano: Ambigüedad, transgresión y resistencia en Porcile. ’, Revista de la Sociedad Española de Italianistas, 10, pp. 107–18.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Nancy, Jean-Luc. ( 2000), Being Singular Plural (trans. R. D. Richardson, and A. E. O’Byrne.), Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Neupert, Richard. ( 1988;), ‘ A cannibal text: Alternation and embedding in Pasolini’s Pigsty. ’, Film Criticism, 12:3, pp. 46–57.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pasolini, Pier Paolo. ( 1966), Uccellacci e uccellini ( The Hawks and the Sparrows ), Italy:: Arco Film;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pasolini, Pier Paolo. ( 1969), Porcile ( Pigsty ), Italy:: IDI Cinematografica, Orso Films, INDIEF (Rome) and CAPAC (Paris);.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pasolini, Pier Paolo. ( 1976;), ‘ The cinema of poetry. ’, in B. Nichols. (ed.), Movies and Methods, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;, pp. 542–58.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pasolini, Pier Paolo. ( 1999;), Saggi sulla politica e la società. (eds W. Siti, and S. De Laude.), Milan:: Mondadori;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pasolini, Pier Paolo. ( 2001), Teatro (eds W. Siti, and S. De Laude.), Milan:: Mondadori;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Past, Elena. ( 2019), Italian Ecocinema beyond the Human, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Rohdie, Sam. ( 1999;), ‘ Neo-realism and Pasolini. ’, in Z. G. Barański. (ed.), Pasolini Old & New, Dublin:: Four Courts Press;, pp. 163–83.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rossini, Manuela. ( 2017;), ‘ Bodies. ’, in B. Clarke, and M. Rossini. (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 153–69.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sabbatini, Marco. ( 2008;), ‘ I maiali di Pasolini: Porcile tra apologo e autoritratto. ’, Versants, Rivista svizzera delle letterature romanze, 55:2, pp. 69–78.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sartoni, Elenora. ( 2019;), ‘ At the margins of Rome, at the margins of the world: The Hawks and the Sparrows and Sacro GRA as peripatetic analyses of capitalist society. ’, Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies, 7:1, pp. 35–53.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Trentin, Filippo. ( 2015;), ‘ Pasolini’s anti-relationality: Porcile and the negative turn in queer theory. ’, LaRivista, Special Issue: ‘Pier Paolo Pasolini entre regression et échec’, 4, pp. 216–23.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Viano, Maurizio. ( 1993), A Certain Realism: Making Use of Pasolini’s Film Theory and Practice, Los Angeles, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ferrara, Enrica Maria. ( 2022;), ‘ Posthuman identity and the human–animal divide in Pier Paolo Pasolini’s The Hawks and the Sparrows and Pigsty. ’, Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies, 10:1, pp. 19–36, https://doi.org/10.1386/jicms_00100_1
    [Google Scholar]