Scripting the silhouette: Writing around the participant in interactive virtual reality experiences | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Screenwriting
  4. Volume 14, Issue 3
  5. Article
Virtual Reality: Exploring Technologies, Practices and Paradigms
  • ISSN: 1759-7137
  • E-ISSN: 1759-7145

Abstract

This article explores the challenges and emerging understandings around crafting the narrative position of the participant in real-time virtual reality (VR). Drawing on interviews with contemporary VR creators working in the United Kingdom, America, Canada and Australia, the article explores the ways in which creators conceptualize the narrative space occupied by an interactive VR participant. It argues that contemporary creators are utilizing the narrative capacity of the participant in ways that challenge traditional notions of characterization and protagonist. Instead, creators engage methods and ideas that are more aligned with the notion of ‘postdramatic’ theatre. I propose that the concept of negative space can be used to explain the relationship between the active participant and authored VR work. Conceiving the space occupied by the embodied participant in terms of ‘negative space’ within the authored environment can allow screenwriters and VR creators to ‘write around’ this absent (but present) participant during the development process.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00134_1
2024-02-02
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrews, Ben, and Roberts, Emma (2022), Zoom interview with author, 7 June.
  2. Asteroids! (2017), Eric Darnell (wr., dir.), USA: Baobab Studios.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aylett, Ruth and Louchart, Sandy (2003), ‘Towards a narrative theory of virtual reality’, Virtual Reality, 7:1, pp. 2–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett, Felix (2021), ‘Felix Barrett in conversation with Emma Cole, on Punchdrunk Theatre Company, ancient literature, and immersive experience’, Antiquity and Immersivity Conference, University of Bristol, 29 March.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Batty, Craig (2010), ‘The physical and emotional threads of the archetypal hero’s journey: Proposing common terminology and re-examining the narrative model’, Journal of Screenwriting, 1:2, pp. 291–308.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Biggin, Rose (2017), Immersive Theatre and Audience Experience: Space, Game and Story in the Work of Punchdrunk, Cham: Springer Nature.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bordwell, David (2007), Poetics of Cinema, New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Braun, Virginia and Clarke, Victoria (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Broadhurst, Susan and Machon, Josephine (2006), Performance and Technology: Practices of Virtual Embodiment and Interactivity, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bucher, John (2017), Storytelling for Virtual Reality: Methods and Principles for Crafting Immersive Narratives, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell, Joseph ([1949] 2008), The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Novato, CA: New World Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Carne y Arena (2017), Alejandro González Iñárritu (wr., dir.), USA: Legendary Entertainment.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Castronova, Edward (2003), ‘Theory of the avatar’, CESifo working paper 863, Munich: Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=385103. Accessed 25 May 2022.
  14. Charlton, James Martin and Moar, Magnus (2018), ‘VR and the dramatic theatre: Are they fellow creatures?’, International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 14:2, pp. 187–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Davies, Char (1998), ‘OSMOSE: Notes on being in immersive virtual space’, Digital Creativity, 9:2, pp. 65–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dent, Steve (2015), ‘NY Times launches VR app with Google Cardboard giveaway’, Engadget, 10 October, https://www.engadget.com/2015-10-20-ny-times-vr-app-google-cardboard.html. Accessed 1 August 2022.
  17. Dredge, Stuart (2015), ‘Pixar co-founder warns virtual-reality moviemakers: “It’s not storytelling”’, The Guardian, 3 December, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/dec/03/pixar-virtual-reality-storytelling-ed-catmull. Accessed 7 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Easter Rising: Voice of a Rebel (2016), Oscar Raby (wr., dir.) Australia and UK: VRTOV and BBC.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Edwards, Shanee (2017), ‘Virtual reality is here to stay and it needs screenwriters’, Screenwriting Magazine, 2 April, https://screenwritingmagazine.com/2017/02/04/virtual-reality-stay-needs-screenwriters. Accessed 27 April 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferguson, Jason (2016), ‘Virtual reality has a storytelling problem and theater will save it’, UploadVR, 8 May, https://uploadvr.com/virtual-reality-storytelling-problem-Theater-will-save/. Accessed 28 July 2020.
  21. Gardner, Lyn (2007), ‘The Masque of the Red Death left me Punchdrunk’, The Guardian, 4 October, https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2007/oct/04/themasqueofthereddeathle. Accessed 27 April 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Giannachi, Gabriella (2004), Virtual Theatres: An Introduction, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Gondwana (2020), Ben Andrews (wr., dir.), Australia: Pernickety Split.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Homestay (2018), Paisley Smith (wr., dir.), Canada: National Film Board of Canada and Jam3.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Isbister, Katherine (2016), How Games Move Us: Emotion by Design, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jenkins, Henry (2004), ‘Game design as narrative architecture’, in N. Wardrip-Fruin and P. Harrigan (eds), First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 118–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jürs-Munby, Karen, Carroll, Jerome and Giles, Steve (eds) (2014), Postdramatic Theatre and the Political: International Perspectives on Contemporary Performance, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaye, Nick and Giannachi, Gabriella (2011), ‘Acts of presence: Performance, mediation, virtual reality’, TDR/The Drama Review, 55:4, pp. 88–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Knowles, Isobel and Sowerwine, Van (2022), Zoom interview with author, 29 June.
  30. Lee, Kwan Min (2004), ‘Presence, explicated’, Communication Theory, 14:1, pp. 27–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lehmann, Hans-Thies (2006), Postdramatic Theatre (trans. K. Jürs-Munby), Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lombard, Matthew and Ditton, Theresa (1997), ‘At the heart of it all: The concept of presence’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3:2, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Machon, Josephine (2013), Immersive Theatres, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Masura, Nadja (2020), Digital Theatre: Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mateas, Michael (2001), ‘A preliminary poetics for interactive drama and games’, Digital Creativity, 12:3, pp. 140–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. McKee, Robert (2014), Story: Style, Structure, Substance, and the Principles of Screenwriting, York: Methuen.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. McLuhan, Marshall and McLuhan, Eric (1988), Laws of Media: The New Science, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mourre, Gaëlle (2022), Zoom interview with author, 7 April.
  39. Murray, Janet H. (1997), Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace, New York: The Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Murray, Janet H. (2016), ‘Not a film and not an empathy machine’, Immerse, 7 October, https://immerse.news/not-a-film-and-not-an-empathy-machine-48b63b0eda93. Accessed 20 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Murray, Janet H. (2020), ‘Virtual/reality: How to tell the difference’, Journal of Visual Culture, 19:1, pp. 11–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Newton, Katy and Soukup, Karen (2016), ‘The storyteller’s guide to the virtual reality audience’, The Stanford d.school, 7 April, https://medium.com/stanford-d-school/the-storyteller-s-guide-to-the-virtual-reality-audience-19e92da57497. Accessed 17 December 2019.
  43. Nield, Sophie (2008), ‘The rise of the character named spectator’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 18:4, pp. 531–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Okita, Randall (2022), Zoom interview with author, 7 April.
  45. Oppenheim, David (2022), Zoom interview with author, 18 March.
  46. Papaioannou, Spyros (2014), ‘Immersion, “smooth” spaces and critical voyeurism in the work of punchdrunk’, Studies in Theatre and Performance, 34:2, pp. 160–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Popat, Sita (2016), ‘Missing in action: Embodied experience and virtual reality’, Theatre Journal, 68:3, pp. 357–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Pope, Vanessa C., Dawes, Robert, Schweiger, Florian and Sheikh, Alia (2017), ‘The geometry of storytelling: Theatrical use of space for 360-degree videos and virtual reality’, in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), Denver, USA, 6–11 May, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 4468–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Queerskins: Ark (2020), Illya Szilak (wr., dir.), USA: Intel Studios and Cloudred.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Romero, Brenda (n.d.), ‘Train’, Brenda Romero, http://brenda.games/train. Accessed 29 July 2022.
  51. Ryan, Marie-Laure (2014), ‘Plot types and interactivity’, in M.-L. Ryan, L. Emerson and B. J. Robertson (eds), The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 395–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ryan, Marie-Laure (2015), Narrative as Virtual Reality 2: Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Salihbegovic, Fahrudin (2020), ‘The encounter with the real: What can complicite’s theatre performance the encounter teach us about the future of VR narratives?’, Body, Space and Technology, 19:1, pp. 125–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Slater, Mel (2009), ‘Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, pp. 3549–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith, Paisley (2022), Zoom interview with author, 10 March.
  56. Sobchack, Vivian (2004), Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture, Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Starless (2017), Ben Andrews (wr., dir.), Australia: Pernickety Split.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Sterzer, Philipp and Rees, Geraint (2009), ‘Bistable perception and consciousness’, in W. P. Banks (ed.), Encyclopedia of Consciousness, Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology, pp. 93–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Steuer, Jonathan (1992), ‘Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence’, Journal of Communication, 42:4, pp. 73–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Szilak, Illya (2022), Zoom interview with author, 16 February.
  61. The Book of Distance (2020), Randall Okita (wr., dir.), Canada: National Film Board of Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. The Messy Truth VR (2020) Elijah Allan-Blitz (wr., dir.), USA: MagicLabs Media and Ryot).
     [Google Scholar]
  63. The Turning Forest (2016), Shelly Silas (wr.), Oscar Raby (dir.), Australia and UK: VRTOV and BBC.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Train (2009), Brenda Romero (wr., dir.), USA: unpublished game.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Unceded Territories (2019), Paisley Smith (wr., dir.), Lawrence Paul Yuxweluptun (dir.), Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Uricchio, William (2018), ‘VR: Between hope, hype, and humbug’, LA Review of Books, 25 June, https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/vr-between-hope-hype-and-humbug. Accessed 14 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Vogler, Christopher ([1992] 1999), The Writer’s Journey: Mythic Structure for Storytellers and Screenwriters, London: Pan Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Wood, Jessica (2011), ‘Gaming and performance: Narrative and identity’, in J. Pitches and S. Popat (eds), Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 115–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Yoshida, Emily (2015), ‘Are humans allowed in VR storytelling?’, The Verge, 3 August, https://www.theverge.com/2015/8/3/9088693/oculus-story-studio-henry-virtual-reality-review. Accessed 7 June 2021.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/josc_00134_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): character; extended reality; narrative arc; negative space; postdramatic theatre; protagonist; VR; XR

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error