Framing utopia: Following Warren and Mosley from urban site to textual practice (and back again) | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2050-9790
  • E-ISSN: 2050-9804

Abstract

This article concerns interconnected works by artists Sophie Warren and Jonathan Mosley, with various collaborators: (2007–08), (2012) and (2012–14). It follows their initial proposal to construct an open timber framework tower on a small site near Smithfield Market in London. Discussions with the planning authority there faltered in 2008. In 2012, aspects of the initial project were revisited as a collectively authored, polyphonic book and follow-on instruction-based performance piece. The article will focus on how an initial desire to challenge accepted uses and values of city space was transposed from a real urban situation into the multiple sites of textual practice and how the relationships between representational space, utopia and reality were put into play. Maintaining an explicit conversation with utopic conceits and motifs, these projects test how far an extended critical spatial practice might develop within the specifics of a given urban situation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00070_1
2024-01-24
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allsopp, Ric (2004), ‘Itinerant pages: The page as performance space’, Performance Research, 9:2, pp. 26.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ballard, Su, Joyce, Zita and Muller, Lizzie (eds) (2012), ‘Networked utopias and speculative futures’, Fibreculture Journal, 20, pp. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, Peter and Clark, William (eds) (2001), Little Tools of Knowledge: Historical Essays on Academic and Bureaucratic Practices, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blaser, Mario and de la Cadena, Marisol (2017), ‘The uncommons: An introduction’, Anthropologica, 59:2, pp. 18593.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. de Bruyn, Eric (2003), ‘Alfaville, or the utopics of Mel Bochner’, Grey Room, 10, pp. 76111.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. City of London Corporation (n.d.), ‘Tall buildings and protected views’, https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/services/planning/planning-policy/protected-views-and-tall-buildings. Accessed 1 June 2018.
  7. City of London Corporation ([1937] 2012), Protected Views: Supplementary Planning Document, London: Department of the Built Environment.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoskyns, Teresa (2014), The Empty Place: Democracy and Public Space, London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jameson, Fredric (1982), The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kafka, Ben (2012), The Demon of Writing: Powers and Failures of Paperwork, New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Marin, Louis ([1984] 1990), Utopics: The Semiological Play of Textual Spaces (trans. A. Vollrath), Amherst, MA: Humanity Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Marin, Louis (1993), ‘Frontiers of utopia: Past and present’, Critical Inquiry, 19:3, pp. 397420.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Marin, Louis ([1994] 2001), On Representation (trans. C. Porter), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Marius, Richard (1985), Thomas More: A Biography, London: Dent.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Marx, Karl ([1843] 2012), ‘Justification of the correspondent from the Mosel’, Rheinische Zeitung, 17 January, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mouffe, Chantalle (2013), ‘Agonistic politics and artistic practices’, in Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically, London: Verso, pp. 85105.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rancière, Jacques (2010), ‘The paradoxes of political art’, in Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics, London: Continuum, pp. 13451.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (2004), ‘Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation’, Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 2:1, pp. 322.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Warren, Sophie and Mosley, Jonathan (eds) (2012), Beyond Utopia, Surface Tension Supplement #5, New York: Errant Bodies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Warren, Sophie and Mosley, Jonathan with Wilson, Robin (2012), ‘Beyond Utopia: The screenplay’, in S. Warren and J. Mosley (eds), Beyond Utopia, Surface Tension Supplement #5, New York: Errant Bodies Press, pp. 1758.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Warren, Sophie and Mosley, Jonathan (2012–14), Utopian Talk-Show, various locations and participants.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Warren, Sophie and Mosley, Jonathan (2017), studio visit and in-person interview with S. Walker, Spike Island Studios, Bristol, 21 March.
  23. Warren, Sophie and Mosley, Jonathan (2018), Skype interview with S. Walker, 5 July.
  24. Weiss, Rachel (2006), ‘Utopiary’, in J. Rüsen, M. Fehr and T. Rieger (eds), Thinking Utopia: Steps into Other Worlds, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 190204.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilson, Robin (2006), ‘Blue sky thinking: A utopia in Bristol’, in B. LaBelle (ed.), Surface Tension, Los Angeles, CA, and Berlin: Errant Bodies, pp. 212.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilson, Robin (2007), ‘Image, text, architecture: The presence that “WAS HERE”’, in J. Rendell, J. Hill, M. Dorrian and M. Fraser (eds), Critical Architecture, London: Routledge, pp. 12934.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wilson, Robin (2012), ‘A collaborative utopian practice: Introduction to the screenplay of “First Build”’, in S. Warren and J. Mosley (eds), Beyond Utopia, Surface Tension Supplement #5, New York: Errant Bodies Press, pp. 14–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilson, Robin (2015), Image, Text, Architecture: The Utopics of the Architectural Media, London: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00070_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00070_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error