The sociality of driverless cars in Life on Wheels | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Urban Cultural Studies
  4. Volume 10, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2050-9790
  • E-ISSN: 2050-9804

Abstract

The ubiquity of automobiles has made it so that a considerable amount of space is devoted to them in cities. In the past, urban scholars considered these car-dedicated spaces to be ‘non-places’ that hindered place attachment and social life in cities. This article investigates new place-making efforts in these spaces by examining the documentary film that offers alternatives. Within the ‘new mobility paradigm’, social space is considered an assemblage of social interactions, objects (e.g. technologies), geographical locations, emplacements and communication networks. Through the analysis of the film, this article investigates the social opportunities and challenges that driverless cars may bring to the urban space. More specifically, in this article, the film shows that the technoscape of driverless cars can direct the city towards a shift in socio-spatial urban design and planning. A profound analytical reading illuminates the need for further social development of this technology. While the technoscape of driverless cars in the current state is in its infancy, its produced social space is yet to be scrutinized; However, at this stage of technology development, the film shows that the driverless environment can help us work towards a new way of understanding mobility spaces and their socio-technological characteristics. This article identifies the social urbanism in car-dedicated spaces projected in films and how this social urbanism can be attainable via new technologies or a transformational shift in mobility.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00071_1
2024-01-24
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlSayyad, Nezar (2006), Cinematic Urbanism: A History of the Modern from Reel to Real, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Andres, Lauren (2013), ‘Differential spaces, power hierarchy and collaborative planning: A critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places’, Urban Studies, 50:4, pp. 759–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. (2022), ‘What’s the status of self-driving cars? There has been progress, but safety questions remain’, CBC News, February, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/self-driving-cars-status-progress-technology-safety/. Accessed 5 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Appadurai, Arjun (1996), ‘Introduction’, in A. Appadurai (ed.), Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, vol. 1, Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Appleyard, Donald, Lynch, Kevin and Myer, John R. (1966), The View from the Road, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Augé, Mark (2008), Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity, London: Verso Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauman, Z. (2005), ‘Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds’, in J. M. de Miguel and J. D. Sanchez (eds), Liquid Modernity, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, pp. 239–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Berry, Chris, Kim, Soyoung and Spigel, Lynn (2010), ‘Introduction’, in C. Berry, S. Kim and L. Spigel (eds), Electronic Elsewheres: Media, Technology, and the Experience of Social Space, vol. 17, Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. vii–xxviii.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Best, Amy L. (2005), ‘Conclusion: The ride of your life’, in A. L. Best (ed.), Fast Cars, Cool Rides: The Accelerating World of Youth and Their Cars, New York: NYU Press, pp. 159–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Borden, Iian (2012), Drive: Journeys through Film, Cities and Landscapes, Chicago, IL: Reaktion Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Borden, Iian (2016), ‘Automobile interstices: Driving and the in-between spaces of the city’, in I. Borden (ed.), Urban Interstices: The Aesthetics and the Politics of the In-Between, London: Routledge, pp. 119–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brandon, Ruth (2002), Automobile: How the Car Changed Life, London: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Broughton, Paul and Walker, Linda (2009), ‘Why do people choose to ride? Enjoyment and risk’ in P. Broughton and L. Walker (eds), Motorcycling and Leisure: Understanding the Recreational PTW Rider, London: Ashgate, pp. 85–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown, Lyndsay and Durrheim, Kevin (2009), ‘Different kinds of knowing: Generating qualitative data through mobile interviewing’, Qualitative Inquiry, 15:5, pp. 911–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Büscher, Monika and Urry, John (2009), ‘Mobile methods and the empirical’, European Journal of Social Theory, 12:1, pp. 99–116.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Castells, Manuel (1996), ‘The space of flows’, in M. Castells (ed.), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. 3, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 376–428.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Croutch, D. (2023), ‘The state of self-driving cars: Autonomous advances. Where is self-driving technology in 2023?’, Techspot, March 2023, https://www.techspot.com/article/2644-the-state-of-self-driving-cars. Accessed 20 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dalakoglou, Dimitris and Harvey, Penny (2012), ‘Roads and anthropology: Ethnographic perspectives on space, time and (im) mobility’, Mobilities, 7:4, pp. 459–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Duffy, Katherine (2011), Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion in Europe, Dubai: De Montfort.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Edensor, Tim (2004), ‘Automobility and national identity: Representation, geography and driving practice’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21:4&5, pp. 101–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Edensor, Tim (2016), ‘Commuter: Mobility, rhythm and commuting’, in T. Edinsor (ed.), Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects, London, Routledge, pp. 189–204.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Edensor, Tim and Holloway, Julian (2008), ‘Rhythmanalysing the coach tour: The Ring of Kerry, Ireland’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33:4, pp. 483–501.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Elliott, Anthony and Urry, John (2010), ‘Mobile lives: A step too far?’, in A. Elliot and J. Urry (eds), Mobile Lives, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Emanuel, Martin, Schipper, Frank and Oldenziel, Ruth (2020), ‘Toward a long-term measurement system of sustainable urban mobility’, in M. Emanuel, F. Schipper and R. Oldenziel (eds), A U-Turn to the Future: Sustainable Urban Mobility since 1850, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 305–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. EIDD (2004), ‘The European Institute for Design and Disability Stockholm Declaration’, Annual General Meeting of the European Institute for Design and Disability in Stockholm.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Everuss, Louis (2020), ‘The new mobilities paradigm and social theory’, in L. Everuss (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Social and Cultural Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 287–305.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Featherstone, Mike (2004), ‘Automobilities: An introduction’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21:4&5, pp. 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Flink, James J. (1972), ‘Three stages of American automobile consciousness’, American Quarterly, 24:4, pp. 451–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Fonda, Seren’a Duckrow (2017), ‘Filmmaking as artistic inquiry: An examination of ceramic art therapy in a maximum-security forensic psychiatric facility’, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, MA: Lesley.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Fossati, Giovanna and van den Oever, Anne (2016), ‘Introduction’, in G. Fossati and A. van den Oever (eds), Exposing the Film Apparatus: The Film Archive as a Research Laboratory, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 13–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Frank, Jeff (2013), ‘The claims of documentary: Expanding the educational significance of documentary film’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45:10, pp. 1018–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Gartman, David (2004), ‘Three ages of the automobile: The cultural logics of the car’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21:4&5, pp. 169–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gehl, Jan (2010), Cities for People, illustrated ed., Washington, DC: Island Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Goldsmith, Ben and O’Regan, Tom (2005), ‘Introduction’, in B. Goldsmith and T. O’Regan (eds), The Film Studio: Film Production in the Global Economy, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. xi–xiii.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hajar, Maarten (2019), ‘Being smart about cities: Seven considerations for a new urban planning and design’, in Untamed Urbanisms, London: Routledge, pp. 50–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Harvey, David (1989), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, vol. 1, The New Social Theory Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Harvey, David (1999), ‘Time-space compression and the postmodern’, in D. Harvey (ed.), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, vol. 1, The New Social Theory Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 98–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Harvey, David (2012), Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, London: Verso Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Harvey, David (2020), ‘The condition of postmodernity’, in D. Harvey (ed.), The New Social Theory Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 235–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Heidegger, Martin (1977), The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays, New York: Garland Pub.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hodge, David (2020), ‘Life on Wheels: Transportation for a new urban century’, Traditional Building Magazine, 9 December 2022, https://www.traditionalbuilding.com/features/life-on-wheels. Accessed 28 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hollands, Robert G. (2014), ‘Critical interventions into the corporate smart city’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8:1, pp. 61–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Huijbens, Edward H. and Benediktsson, Karl (2007), ‘Practising highland heterotopias: Automobility in the interior of Iceland’, Mobilities, 2:1, pp. 143–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Jacyna, Marianna and Kotylak, Piotre (2020), ‘Decision-making problems of collective transport development in terms of sustainable urban mobility’, Journal of Konbin, 50:2, pp. 359–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Jain, Juliet (2019), ‘The making of mundane bus journeys’, in The Cultures of Alternative Mobilities: Routes Less Travelled, London, Routledge, pp. 91–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Jain, Sarah S. (2006) ‘Urban violence: Luxury in made space’, in M. Sheller and J. Urry (eds), Mobile Technologies of the City, London: Routledge, pp. 69–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kleinert, Martina (2019), ‘Solitude at sea or social sailing? The constitution and perception of the cruising community’, in P. Vannini (ed.), The Cultures of Alternative Mobilities: Routes Less Travelled, London, Routledge, pp. 159–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Koeck, Richard (2012), Cine-scapes: Cinematic Spaces in Architecture and Cities, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Laurier, Eric (2004), ‘Doing office work on the motorway’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21:4&5, pp. 261–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lefebvre, Henry ([1974] 1991), The Production Space, Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Letherby, Gayle and Reynolds, Gillian (2005), Train Tracks: Work, Play, and Politics on the Railways, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Licoppe, Christian and Guillot, Romain (2006), ‘ICTs and the engineering of encounters: A case study of the development of a mobile game based on the geolocation of terminals’, in M. Sheller and J. Urry (eds), Mobile Technologies of the City, London: Routledge, pp. 152–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Lyons, Glenn and Urry, John (2005), ‘Travel time use in the information age’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39:2&3, pp. 257–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Mackenzie, Adrian (2006), ‘From cafe to park bench: Wi-Fi® and technological overflows in the city’, in M. Sheller and J. Urry (eds), Mobile Technologies of the City, London: Routledge, pp. 137–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Massey, Doreen (1999), ‘Space-time, “science” and the relationship between physical geography and human geography’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24:3, pp. 261–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Massey, Doreen and Allen, John (1984), Geography Matters! A Reader, New York: Cambridge University Press in association with the Open University.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. McDonald, Noreen C. (2012), ‘Is there a gender gap in school travel? An examination of US children and adolescents’, Journal of Transport Geography, 20:1, pp. 80–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Merriman, Peter (2009), ‘Marc Augé on space, place and non-places’, Irish Journal of French Studies, 9:1, pp. 9–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Metzger, Jonathan (2011), ‘Strange spaces: A rationale for bringing art and artists into the planning process’, Planning Theory, 10:3, pp. 213–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Milne, Sue (2009), ‘Moving into and through the public world: Children’s perspectives on their encounters with adults’, Mobilities, 4:1, pp. 103–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Neumann, Mark (1993), ‘Living on tortoise time: Alternative travel as the pursuit of lifestyle’, Symbolic Interaction, 16:3, pp. 201–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Norberger-Schulz, Christian (2007), ‘The phenomenon of place’, in M. Larice and E. Macdonald (eds), Urban Design Reader, New York: Routledge, pp. 125–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Norberger-Schulz, Christian (2012), ‘The phenomenon of place’, in C. Norberger-Schulz (ed.), The Urban Design Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 125–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Ohnmacht, Timo, Maksim, Hanja and Bergman, Manfred M. (2009), Mobilities and Inequality, Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. OICA (2020), ‘Motorization Rate 2015’, http://www.oica.net/category/vehicles-in-use. Accessed 3 April 2023.
  67. Park, Robert E., Burgess, Ernest W. and Sampson, Robert J. (2019), The City, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Penz, Francois and Lu, Andong (2011), Urban Cinematics: Understanding Urban Phenomena through the Moving Image, Bristol: Intellect.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Pflugfelder, Ehren H. (2016), ‘Persuasive transportation’, in E. H. Pflugfelder (ed.), Communicating Mobility and Technology: A Material Rhetoric for Persuasive Transportation, London: Routledge, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Putnam, Robert D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, London: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Relph, Edward (2007), ‘Prospects for places’, in M. Carmona and M. Tiesdell (eds), Urban Design Reader, London: Architectural Press, pp. 119–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Resina, Joan R. (2009), ‘Documentary as a space of intuition: Luis Buñuel’s Land without bread’, in B. Warf and S. Arias (eds), The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, London: Routledge, pp. 192–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Rose, Gillian (2016), ‘Towards a critical visual methodology’, in G. Rose (ed.), Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, London: Sage Publications, pp. 24–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Schöenfelder, Stefan and d’Hauteserre, Annie-M. (2011), ‘Urban rythms and travel behaviour: Spatial and temporal phenomena of daily travel’, Tourism Geographies, 13:3, pp. 502–03.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Sennett, Richard (1996), Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western Civilization, New York: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Sheller, Mimi (2004), ‘Automotive emotions: Feeling the car’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21:4&5, pp. 221–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sheller, Mimi (2017), ‘From spatial turn to mobilities turn’, Current Sociology, 65:4, pp. 623–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Sheller, Mimi and Urry, John (2000), ‘The city and the car’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24:4, pp. 737–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Sheller, Mimi and Urry, John (2006a), ‘Introduction: Mobile cities, urban mobilities’, in M. Sheller and J. Urry (eds), Mobile Technologies of the City, London: Routledge, pp. 9–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Sheller, Mimi and Urry, John (2006b), ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38:2, pp. 207–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Shuman, Michael (1998), ‘Introduction’, in M. Shuman (ed.), Going Local: Creating Self-Reliant Communities in a Global Age, New York: The Free Press, pp. 1–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Simonsen, Kirsten (2005), ‘Bodies, sensations, space and time: The contribution from Henri Lefebvre’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 87:1, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Singer, Ben (2001), ‘Sensationalism and urban modernity’, in B. Singer (ed.), Melodrama and Modernity: Early Sensational Cinema and Its Contexts, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 59–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Smart City Sweden (2020), ‘Sweden number one in sustainable development’, 3 July, https://smartcitysweden.com/sweden-number-one-in-sustainable-development-report/. Accessed 1 May 2023.
  85. Söderström, Ola and Paasche, Till and Klauser, Francisco (2014), ‘Smart cities as corporate storytelling’, City, 18:3, pp. 307–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Soja, Edward W. (1980), ‘The socio-spatial dialectic’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70:2, pp. 207–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Soja, Edward W. (1989), Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory, New York: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Soja, Edward (2010), ‘Spatializing the urban, Part I’, City, 14:6, pp. 629–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Spring, Ulrike (2006), ‘The linear city: Touring Vienna in the nineteenth century’, in M. Sheller and J. Urry (eds), Mobile Technologies of the City, London: Routledge, pp. 29–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Thrift, Nigel (1998), ‘Inhuman geographies: Landscapes of speed, light and power’, in P. J. Cloke (ed.), Writing the Rural: Five Cultural Geographies, London: Chapman Pub, pp. 191–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Thrift, Nigel (2004), ‘Driving in the city’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21:4&5, pp. 41–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Trancik, Roger (1986), Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design, New York: John Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Urry, John (2000), Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Urry, John (2002), Consuming Places, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Urry, John (2004), ‘The “system” of automobility’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21:4&5, pp. 25–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Uteng, Tanu P. and Cresswell, Tim (2008), ‘Gendered mobilities: Towards a holistic understanding’, in T. P. Uteng and T. Cresswell (eds), Gendered Mobilities, London: Ashgate Aldershot, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Vannini, Phillip (2016), ‘Mobility, ritual, and performance’, in P. Vannini (ed.), The Cultures of Alternative Mobilities, London: Routledge, pp. 227–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Volti, Rudi (1996), ‘A century of automobility’, Technology and Culture, 37:4, pp. 663–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Wagner, C. and Shaheen, S. (1998), ‘Car sharing and mobility management: Facing new challenges with technology and innovative business planning’, Journal of World Transport Policy and Practice, 4:2, pp. 39–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Wagoner, Brady, Chaudhary, Nandita and Hviid, Pernille (2015), Integrating Experiences: Body and Mind Moving between Contexts, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Walsh, Michael J. (2010), ‘Driving to the beat of one’s own hum: Automobility and musical listening’, in N. K. Denzin (ed.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Bradford: Emerald Group, pp. 201–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Whiteman, David (2004), ‘Out of the theaters and into the streets: A coalition model of the political impact of documentary film and video’, Political Communication, 21:1, pp. 51–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Wollen, Peter and Kerr, Joe (2002), Autopia: Cars and Culture, London: Reaktion Books.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00071_1
Loading
The sociality of driverless cars in Life on Wheels
Journal of Urban Cultural Studies 10, 195 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs_00071_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00071_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jucs_00071_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): film space; mobile space; production of space; social space; technoscape; urban mobility

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error