Information films as rhetorical responses during the COVID-19 crisis | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Visual Political Communication
  4. Volume 9, Issue 1
  5. Article
COVID-19 Health Campaigns
  • ISSN: 2633-3732
  • E-ISSN: 2633-3740

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Norwegian health authorities provided citizens with advice, information about the disease and recommendations to take the COVID-19 vaccine. One of their tools was information videos shared on their official Facebook pages. Through the lens of the rhetorical situation, this article investigates these videos’ role as part of the Norwegian health authorities’ rhetorical response. During a constantly changing pandemic, governments continuously meet new challenges and must adjust their strategies. The various phases of the pandemic and the different rhetorical situations require different responses. We examine how the Norwegian health authorities use information videos to respond to these varying rhetorical situations during the COVID-19 pandemic and what characterizes their visual rhetoric. We show that during a lasting crisis such as the corona pandemic, different phases recur, allowing us to establish some general rhetorical situations. The responses to the situations are part of an ongoing process of rhetoric on the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analyses find that informative videos often use graphic imagery, are longer and use a direct address from authorities to citizen and thus serve a directive function. Persuasive videos are shorter, have less direct voice-over and tend to serve a more expressive function. Still, despite their variation in content and form, the videos share one type of main rhetorical strategy that we call The main appeal in most of the videos is somewhere in-between deference and participation, or sometimes both at the same time. Instead of direct requests, they camouflage the direct appeal for compliance with the measures through filmic strategies in order not to compel acceptance but to invite appreciation. The videos present the citizens with scenarios and position them as apparently free to decide for themselves. In this way the rhetoric of the information films works as invitations to appreciate and adopt certain attitudes and behaviours.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Research Council of Norway (Award 296347)
© 2022 (2021) Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00016_1
2022-12-15
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biesecker, B. A.. ( 1989;), ‘ Rethinking the rhetorical situation from within the thematic of différance. ’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 22:2, pp. 110–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bitzer, L. F.. ( 1968;), ‘ The rhetorical situation. ’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1:1, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bitzer, L. F.. ( 1980;), ‘ Functional communication. ’, in E. E. White. (ed.), Rhetoric in Transition. Studies in the Nature and Uses of Rhetoric, University Park, PA:: Pennsylvania State University Press;, pp. 21–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bjørkdahl, K.,, Kjeldsen, J. E.,, Villadsen, L., and Vigsø, O.. ( 2021;), ‘ Argumentum ad solidaritatem: Rhetorical leadership strategies in Scandinavia during COVID-19. ’, in M. Lewis,, E. Govender, and K. Holland. (eds), Communicating COVID-19, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 163–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Black, E.. ( 1978), Rhetorical Criticism: A Study in Method, Madison, WI:: University of Wisconsin Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyd, A. D.,, Furgal, C. M.,, Mayeda, A. M.,, Jardine, C. G., and Driedger, S. M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Exploring the role of trust in health risk communication in Nunavik, Canada. ’, Polar Record, 55:4, pp. 235–40, https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224741900010X. Accessed 9 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell, K. K., and Jamieson, K. H.. ( 1978;), ‘ Form and genre in rhetorical criticism: An introduction. ’, in K. K. Campbell, and K. H. Jamieson. (eds), Form and Genre: Shaping Rhetorical Action, Falls Church, VA:: Speech Communication Association;, pp. 9–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Drumm, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ The art of persuasion: A critical survey of British animated information films (1939–2009). ’, Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough:: Loughborough University;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Edbauer, J.. ( 2005;), ‘ Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. ’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35:4, pp. 5–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Esaiasson, P.,, Sohlberg, J.,, Ghersetti, M., and Johansson, B.. ( 2021;), ‘ How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: Evidence from “the Swedish experiment”. ’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:3, pp. 748–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12419. Accessed 11 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartelius, J.. ( 2011), The Rhetoric of Expertise, Lanham, MD:: Lexington Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoff-Clausen, E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Attributing rhetorical agency in a crisis of trust: Danske Bank’s act of public listening after the credit collapse. ’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 43:5, pp. 425–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2013.839820. Accessed 28 September 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ihlen, Ø,, Toledano, M., and Just, S.. ( 2021;), ‘ Using rhetorical situations to examine and improve vaccination communication. ’, Frontiers in Communication, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.697383. Accessed 21 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Institute of Global Health Innovation ( 2021), COVID-19: Global Attitudes towards a COVID-19 Vaccine, London:: Institute of Global Health Innovation;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kjeldsen, J. E.. ( 2008;), ‘ Retoriske omstændigheder. ’, Rhetorica Scandinavica, 48, pp. 42–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kjeldsen, J. E.,, Ihlen, Ø.,, Just, S., and Larsson, A. O.. ( 2021;), ‘ Expert ethos and the strength of networks: Negotiations of credibility in mediated debate on COVID-19. ’, Health Promotion International, 37:2, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab095. Accessed 6 January 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kjeldsen, J. E.,, Mølster, R., and Ihlen, Ø.. ( 2022;), ‘ Expert uncertainty: Arguments bolstering the ethos of expertise in situations of uncertainty. ’, in S. Oswald,, M. Lewinski,, S. Greco, and S. Villata. (eds), The Pandemic of Argumentation, Cham:: Springer;, pp. 85–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Larson, R. L.. ( 1970;), ‘ Lloyd Bitzer’s “rhetorical situation” and the classification of discourse: Problems and implications. ’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 3:3, pp. 165–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller, C. R.. ( 1984;), ‘ Genre as social action. ’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70:2, pp. 151–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. NOU ( 2021), Myndighetenes håndtering av koronapandemien. Rapport fra koronakommisjonen, Oslo:: Departementenes sikkerhets- og servicetjeneste;. Accessed 21 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Opinion ( 2021a;), ‘ Rekordhøy vilje til å a vaksine. ’, 22 February, https://opinion.no/2021/02/rekordhoy-vilje-til-a-ta-vaksine/. Accessed 21 February 2022.
  22. Opinion ( 2021b;), ‘ Feil at folks støtte stuper. ’, 10 February, https://opinion.no/2021/02/feil-at-folks-stotte-stuper. Accessed 21 February 2022.
  23. Renn, O., and Livine, D.. ( 1991;), ‘ Credibility and trust in risk communication. ’, in R. E. Kasperson, and P. J. M. Stallen. (eds), Communication Risks to the Public, Dordrecht:: Kluwer;, pp. 175–218.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Roberto, A. J.,, Goodall, C. E., and Wittle, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Raising the alarm and calming fears: Perceived threat and efficacy during risk and crisis. ’, in R. L. Heath, and H. D. O’Hair. (eds), Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 285–301.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Searle, J. S.. ( 1969), Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, London and New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Trutor, J. W.. ( 2011;), ‘ Please stand by: Reconstruction, decolonization and security in British and French public information films in the postwar era, 1945–1965. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Vatz, R. E.. ( 1973;), ‘ The myth of the rhetorical situation. ’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6:3, pp. 154–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. WHO ( 2021;), ‘ Ten threats to global health in 2019. ’, https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019. Accessed 30 August 2021.
  29. Ytre-Arne, B., and Moe, H.. ( 2021;), ‘ Doomscrolling, monitoring and avoiding: News use in COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. ’, Journalism Studies, 22:13, pp. 1739–55, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1952475. Accessed 3 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mølster, Ragnhild, and Kjeldsen, Jens E.. ( 2022 [2021];), ‘ Information films as rhetorical responses during the COVID-19 crisis. ’, Journal of Visual Political Communication, 9:1, pp. 29–58, https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00016_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00016_1
Loading
Information films as rhetorical responses during the COVID-19 crisis
Journal of Visual Political Communication 9, 29 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00016_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00016_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jvpc_00016_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): corona; filmic strategies; health authorities; information videos; pandemic phases; rhetorical situation; trust; visual rhetoric

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error