‘I came here to do art, not English’: Antecedent subject subcultures meet current practices of writing in art and design education

References

1. Addison, N.. ( 2010;), ‘ Art and design in education: Ruptures and continuities. ’, in N. Addison,, L. Burgess,, J. Steers, and J. Trowell., Understanding Art Education: Engaging Reflexively with Practice, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 7–23.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ball, S.. ( 1981), Beachside Comprehensive: A Case Study of Secondary Schooling, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ball, S., and Lacey, A.. ( 1984;), ‘ Subject disciplines as the opportunity for group action: A measured critique of subject sub-cultures. ’, in A. Hargreaves, and P. Woods. (eds), Classrooms and Staffrooms, Milton Keynes:: Open University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blythman, M., and Orr, M.. ( 2004), The Process of Design Is Almost Like Writing an Essay: Writing Purposefully in Art & Design, Phase 4 Project, Higher Education Funding Council for England, Fund for the Development of Teaching and Learning;, http://writing-pad.org. Accessed 15 December 2016.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J. C.. ( 1994;), ‘ Language and relationship to language in the teaching situation. ’, in P. Bourdieu,, J. C. Passeron, and M. Saint Martin. (eds), Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professorial Power, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bruner, J. S.. ( 1960), The Process of Education, New York:: Vintage;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cazeaux, C.. ( 2006;), ‘ Interrupting the artist: Theory, practice and topology in Sartre’s aesthetics. ’, in K. MacLeod, and L. Holdridge. (eds), Thinking through Art: Reflections on Art as Research, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 40–50.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Duve, T.. ( 1994;), ‘ When form has become attitude – and beyond. ’, in N. De Ville, and S. Foster. (eds), The Artist and the Academy: Issues in Fine Art Education and the Wider Cultural Context, Southampton:: John Hansard Gallery;, pp. 23–40.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Edexcel ( 2010), Edexcel BTEC Level 3 Nationals Specification in Art and Design, London:: Edexcel Limited;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Eisner, E.. ( 2002), Arts and the Creation of Mind, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Field, D.. ( 1970), Change in Art Education, London and New York:: Routledge and Kegan Paul;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Golby, M.,, Greenwald, J., and West, R.. ( 1975), Curriculum Design, London:: The Open University;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goodson, I. F.. ( 1993), School Subjects and Curriculum Change, London:: Falmer Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goodson, I. F.. ( [1988] 1995), The Making of Curriculum: Collected Essays, London:: The Falmer Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goodson, I. F.. ( 1997), Studying Curriculum: Cases and Methods, Buckingham:: Open University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goodson, I. F.,, Anstead, C. J., and Mangan, M. J.. ( 1998), Subject Knowledge: Readings for the Study of School Subjects, London:: The Falmer Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goodson, I. F., and Mangan, J. M.. ( 1995;), ‘ Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. ’, British Educational Research Journal, 21:5, pp. 613–29.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Goodson, I. F., and Marsh, C. J.. ( 1996), Studying School Subjects: A Guide, London and Washington, DC:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goodson, I. F.,, Knobel, M.,, Lankshear, C., and Mangan, M.. ( 2002), Cyber Spaces/Social Spaces: Culture Clash in Computerized Classrooms, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. James, D., and Biesta, G. J. J.. ( 2007), Improving Learning Cultures in Further Education, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kill, R.. ( 2004), Thinking about Writing: Writing Purposefully in Art & Design, Phase 4 Project, Higher Education Funding Council for England, Fund for the Development of Teaching and Learning;, http://writing-pad.org. Accessed 15 December 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lave, E., and Wenger, J.. ( 1991), Situated Learning, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lockheart, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ The importance of writing as a material practice for art and design students: A contemporary rereading of the Coldstream Reports. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 17:2, pp. 151–75.
    [Google Scholar]
24. MacDonald, S.. ( 2005), A Century of Art and Design Education: From Arts and Crafts to Conceptual Art, Cambridge:: Lutterworth Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. MacLeod, K., and Holdridge, L.. ( 2005;), ‘ Related objects of thought: art and thought, theory and practice. ’, in M. Miles. (ed.), Innovations in Art and Design. New Practices – New Pedagogies: A Reader, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 143–53.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Melrose, S.. ( 2009;), ‘ Expert-intuitive processing and the logics of production: Struggles in (the wording of) creative decision: Making in dance. ’, in J. Butterworth, and L. Wildschut. (eds), Contemporary Choreography: A Critical Reader, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Melrose, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ A cautionary note or two, amid the pleasures and pains of participation in performance-making as research. ’, Participation, Research and Learning in the Performing Arts Symposium, Centre for Creative Collaboration, London, May.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Meskimmon, M.. ( 2004;), ‘ Corporeal theory with/in practice: Christine Borland’s winter garden. ’, Art History, 26:3, pp. 442–55.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ministry of Education ( 1960), First Report of the National Advisory Council on Art Education, London:: Her Majesty’s Stationer’s Office (HMSO);.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mitchell, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Speculations of language in the arts. ’, Association of Art Historians Conference, Tate Britain, London, April.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pakes, A.. ( 2004;), ‘ Art as action or art as object? The embodiment of knowledge in practice as research. ’, working papers in Art and Design 3, London:: University of Roehampton;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pearson ( 2016), Peasrson BTEC Level 3 Nationals in Art and Design – Unit 2 – Final Sample Assessment Materials, London:: Pearson Education Limited;.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pollen, A.. ( 2015;), ‘ My position in the design world: Locating subjectivity in the design curriculum. ’, Design and Culture, 7:1, pp. 85–105.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Raein, M.. ( 2003), Where Is the ‘I’?, London:: Writing-PAD;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Read, H.. ( 1943), Education through Art, London:: Faber and Faber;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Richardson, M.. ( 1948), Art and the Child, London:: University of London Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rintoul, J.. ( 2017), Integrating Critical and Contextual Studies in Art and Design: Possibilities for Post-Compulsory Education, Abingdon and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sennett, R.. ( 2008), The Craftsman, London:: Penguin Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Summerson Report ( 1964), The First Report of the National Council for Diplomas in Art and Design (NCDAD), London:: NCDAD;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Stenhouse, L.. ( 1975), An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development, London:: Heinemann;.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wilkins, R.. ( 2011), Research Engagement for School Development, London:: Institute of Education Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Young, M. F. D.. ( 1971;), ‘ An approach to the study of curricula as socially organised knowledge. ’, in M. F. D. Young. (ed.), Knowledge and Control, London:: Collier-Macmillan;, pp. 19–46.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rintoul, Jenny. ( 2022;), ‘ “I came here to do art, not English”: Antecedent subject subcultures meet current practices of writing in art and design education. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 15:2, pp. 140–56, https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00035_1
    [Google Scholar]