Becoming topological of heavy metal: Notes from India | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 9, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2052-3998
  • E-ISSN: 2052-4005

Abstract

The article argues for doing away with master concepts such as ‘subculture’ and similar ancillary concepts and instead argues for the open-ended pursuit of the social. Instead of deploying a priori spatiotemporal concepts such as ‘subculture’, ‘scene’ or ‘tribe’ it argues that a more fruitful approach would be to interrogate the work that these concepts do. It is important to grasp how and if these concepts close down or open up the field. The article argues that these concepts are necessarily topological and scalar, i.e. they are concerned with fixing musical collectivities in space–time. Through two ethnographic vignettes from India – of metal gigs in Kolkata and Bengaluru set a decade apart – the article argues for a minor and open-ended approach to heavy metal. Against the master concepts, the article argues for a seepage of minor aesthetics into our theorizations which can challenge the totalizing impulse of theory. An open-ended pursuit of heavy metal allows comprehension of a range of human and non-human processes in the social which otherwise risk being obfuscated by a narrow concern of chasing a master concept. In the concluding section, the article ends with a brief methodological note on the black metal/punk/grindcore act from India, Heathen Beast and the difficulty of situating them through conventional concepts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/mms_00113_1
2024-03-14
2024-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dunn, S. and McFadyen, S. (2008), Global Metal, Canada: Banger Films.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hall, S. and Jefferson, T. (eds) (2006), Resistance through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain, 2nd ed., rev. and expanded ed., London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2005), ‘Subcultures, scenes or tribes? None of the above’, Journal of Youth Studies, 8:1, pp. 2140.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jenks, C. (2005), Subculture: The Fragmentation of the Social, London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lury, C., Parisi, L. and Terranova, T. (2012), ‘Introduction: The becoming topological of culture’, Theory, Culture & Society, 29:4–5, pp. 335.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Varas Díaz, N., Wallach, J., Clinton, E. and Nevárez Araújo, D. (eds) (2023), Defiant Sounds: Heavy Metal Music in the Global South, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wallach, J. and Levine, A. (2012), ‘“I want you to support local metal”: A theory of metal scene formation’, Popular Music History, 6:1, pp. 11634.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, P. (2011), ‘Gilles Deleuze and minor rhetoric’, ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 68:2, pp. 21429.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/mms_00113_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): CCCS; collective; culture; Heathen Beast; minor; scene; subculture; tribe
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error