Navigating history: Aesthetics and appropriation and the interactive web documentary Freedom’s Ring (2013)

References

1. Aston, Judith, and Gaudenzi, Sandra. ( 2012;), ‘ Interactive documentary: Setting the field. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 6:2, pp. 125–39.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bolter, J. David, and Grusin, Richard A.. ( 1999), Remediation: Understanding New Media, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carpentier, Nico. ( 2011;), ‘ Contextualising author-audience convergences. ’, Cultural Studies, 25:4&5, pp. 517–33.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dang, Sarah-Mai. ( 2016), Chick Flicks: Film, Feminismus und Erfahrung, Hamburg:: oa books/tredition;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dang, Sarah-Mai. (forthcoming 2020a;), ‘ Publish less, communicate more! Reflecting the potentials and challenges of a hybrid self-publishing project. ’, in K. Gossett,, A. Finger, and V. Kuhn. (eds), The Digital Dissertation: History, Theory, Practice, n.pag. Preprint MediArXiv , 6 January, doi: 10.33767/osf.io/ehjkg.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dang, Sarah-Mai. (forthcoming 2020b;), ‘ Unknowable facts and digital databases: Reflections on the Women Film Pioneers Project and women in film history. ’, in M. Burghardt,, A. Heftberger,, J. Pause,, N.-O. Walkowski, and M. Zeppelzauer. (eds), Digital Humanities Quarterly, special issue: ‘Digital Humanities & Film Studies: Analyzing the Modalities of Moving Images’ , n.pag.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Daniel, Sharon. ( n.d;.), ‘ Argument, inquiry and political narrative: Navigating an aesthetics of database documentary. ’, in M. Soar, and M. Gagnon. (eds), Database | Narrative | Archive: Seven Interactive Essays on Digital Nonlinear Storytelling, http://dnaanthology.com/anvc/dna/aesthetics--politics. Accessed 5 April 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dovey, Jon, and Rose, Mandy. ( 2013;), ‘ “This great mapping of ourselves”: New documentary forms online. ’, in B. Winston. (ed.), The BFI Companion to Documentary, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 366–75.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gaudenzi, Sandra. ( 2013;), ‘ The living documentary: From representing reality to co-creating reality in digital interactive documentary. ’, doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London;, http://research.gold.ac.uk/7997/. Accessed 18 April 2017.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hediger, Vinzenz, and Schneider, Alexandra. ( 2011;), ‘ Vom Kanon zum Netzwerk: Hindi-Filme und Gebrauchsfilme als Gegenstände des Wissens einer post-kinematographischen Filmkultur. ’, in G. Sommer,, V. Hediger, and O. Fahle. (eds), Orte Filmischen Wissens: Filmkultur und Filmvermittlung im Zeitalter digitaler Netzwerke, Marburg:: Schüren;, pp. 141–58.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Heftberger, Adelheid. ( 2014;), ‘ Film archives and digital humanities – An impossible match? New job descriptions and the challenges of the digital era. ’, MedieKultur, 30:57, pp. 135–53.
    [Google Scholar]
12. i-Docs Official Website ( 2019;), ‘ About. ’, i-Docs Official Website, http://i-docs.org/about-interactive-documentary-idocs/. Accessed 28 February 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Manovich, Lev. ( 1999;), ‘ Database as symbolic form. ’, Convergence, 5:2, pp. 80–99.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Nash, Kate. ( 2012;), ‘ Modes of interactivity: Analysing the webdoc. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 34:2, pp. 195–210.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Nash, Kate. ( 2014;), ‘ What is interactivity for? The social dimension of web-documentary participation. ’, Continuum, 28:3, pp. 383–95.
    [Google Scholar]
16. O’Flynn, Siobhan. ( 2012;), ‘ Documentary’s metamorphic form: Webdoc, interactive, transmedia, participatory and beyond. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 6:2, pp. 141–57.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Pauleit, Winfried. ( 2014;), ‘ Film als Theorie: Der Essayfilm als “doing-Image-Text”. ’, Nach dem Film, n.pag, http://www.nachdemfilm.de/content/film-als-theorie. Accessed 10 February 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Schnapp, Jeffry,, Lunenfeld, P., and Presner, Todd. ( 2009;), ‘ The digital humanities manifesto 2. ’, Humanities Blast Engaged Digital Humanities Scholarship, 22 June, humanitiesblast.com/manifesto/Manifesto_V2.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sobchack, Vivian. ( 1992), The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sobchack, Vivian. ( 2004), Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Stalder, Felix. ( 2016), Kultur der Digitalität, Berlin:: Suhrkamp;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. van Dijck, José. ( 2009;), ‘ Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 31:1, pp. 41–58.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dang, Sarah-Mai. ( 2020 [2019];), ‘ Navigating history: Aesthetics and appropriation and the interactive web documentary Freedom’s Ring (2013). ’, New Cinemas, 17:1, pp. 21–35, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ncin_00002_1
    [Google Scholar]