Between nature and culture: Jakob von Uexküll's concept of Umwelten and how photography shapes our worlds | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Philosophy of Photography
  4. Volume 10, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

Abstract

This article addresses traditional perceptions about photography's position between nature and culture and concomitant schools of thinking focusing pre-dominantly on the photographic image as a form of visual representation. Aiming to develop an alternative perspective it considers a biosemiotic approach and turns to Jakob von Uexküll's model of subjective sentient worlds () that critically dissolves the perceived dualism between nature and culture that has also underpinned most theoretical thinking about photography in the past. Today photography is largely embedded into social media platforms and their interlinked digital networks, which holds far-reaching consequences for a medium that in this current form can only be fully understood if it is considered as a form of embodied material practice. Aiming to understand some of the complex manifestations this technical evolution entails the article further considers the relevance of recent non-representational concepts arising out of cognition theory and cultural geography and uses the 'selfie' as a 'theoretical object'.

© Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00003_1
2019-04-01
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkin, A.. (2013);, 'Peirce's theory of signs'. , The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 4 April, 2013 ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics. Accessed 11 July 2016 .
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barthes, R.. ([1981] 2000), Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, London:: Vintage Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barthes, R.. (1982);, 'The photographic message'. , in S. Sontag. (ed.), A Barthes Reader, New York:: Hill and Wang;, pp. 194-210.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Batchen, G.. (1997), Burning with Desire: The Conception of Photography, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Batchen, G.. (2013);, 'Observing by watching: Joachim Schmid and the art of exchange'. , Aperture, 210:Spring, pp. 46-49.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brentari, C.. (2015), Jakob von Uexküll: The Discovery of the Umwelt Between Biosemiotics and Theoretical Biology, Dordrecht:: Springer;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Burgin, V.. (1982), Thinking Photography, London:: Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Crimp, D.. (1984);, 'Pictures'. , in B. Wallis. (ed.), Art After Modernism: Rethinking Representation, New York and Boston:: New Museum of Contemporary Art;, pp. 175-88.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Elo, M.. (2012);, 'Notes on haptic realism: Digital photography and shifting conditions of embodiment'. , Philosophy of Photography, 3:1, pp. 19-27.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisher, A.. (2013);, 'Photographic scale'. , Philosophy of Photography, 3:2, pp. 310-29.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Frosh, P.. (2015);, 'The gestural image: The selfie, photography theory, and kinesthetic sociability'. , International Journal of Communication, 9:1, pp. 1607-28.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Garlick, S.. (2009);, 'Given time: Biology, nature and photographic vision'. , History of the Human Sciences, 22:5, pp. 81-101.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Gómez-Cruz, E., and Lehmuskallio, A.. (eds) (2016a), Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gómez-Cruz, E., and Lehmuskallio, A.. (eds) (2016b);, 'Why material visual practices?'. , in Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 1-16.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gómez-Cruz, E., and Thornham, H.. (2015);, 'Selfies beyond self-representation: The (theoretical) f(r)ictions of a practice'. , Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 7:1, pp. 1-10.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeffrey, I.. (1981);, 'Photography and nature'. , Art Journal, 41:1, pp. 26-32.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelsey, R.. (2013);, 'Our lady of perpetual help: Thoughts on recent scholarship on photography'. , Aperture, 210:Spring, pp. 50-55.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Koch, C., and Laurent, G.. (1999);, 'Complexity and the nervous system'. , Science, 284:5411, pp. 96-98.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kynast, K.. (2012);, 'Jakob von Uexküll's Umweltlehre between cinematography, perception and philosophy'. , Philosophy of Photography, 3:2, pp. 227-43.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lorimer, H.. (2005);, 'Cultural geography: The busyness of being "more-than-representational"'. , Progress in Human Geography, 29:1, pp. 83-94.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lukitsh, J.. (1999);, 'The engine of visualization: Thinking through photography'. , Technology and Culture, 40:3, pp. 701-02.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Männistö, A.. (2016);, 'The Boston marathon bombing investigation as an example of networked journalism and the power of big data analysis'. , in E. Gómez-Cruz, and A. Lehmuskallio. (eds), Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 86-97.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Margolis, H.. (1987), Patterns, Thinking, and Cognition: A Theory of Judgment, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Maynard, P.. (1997), The Engine of Visualization: Thinking Through Photography, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchell, W. J. T.. (1992), The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitchell, W. J. T.. (1994), Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Pargana Mota, S.. (2016);, '"Today I dressed like this": Selling clothes and playing for celebrity'. , in E. Gómez-Cruz, and A. Lehmuskallio. (eds), Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 35-51.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Portugali, J.. (2011), Complexity, Cognition and the City, Berlin and Heidelberg:: Springer Verlag;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Richter, F.. (2017);, 'Smartphones cause photography boom'. , Statista, 31 August, https://www.statista.com/chart/10913/number-of-photos-taken-worldwide/. Accessed 22 March 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Rubinstein, D.. (2013);, 'The grin of Schrödinger's cat: Quantum photography and the limits of representation'. , in D. Rubinstein,, J. Golding, and A. Fisher. (eds), On the Verge of Photography: Imaging Beyond Representation, Birmingham:: Article Press;, pp. 33-49.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Rubinstein, D., and Sluis, K.. (2008);, 'A life more photographic'. , Photographies, 1:1, pp. 9-28.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rubinstein, D.,, Golding, J., and Fisher, A.. (eds) (2013), On the Verge of Photography: Imaging Beyond Representation, Birmingham:: Article Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Saitta, L., and Zucker, J.-D.. (2013), Abstraction in Artificial Intelligence and Complex Systems, New York:: Springer;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Saltz, J.. (2014);, 'Art at arm's length: A history of the selfie'. , Vulture, 26 January, http://www.vulture.com/2014/01/history-of-the-selfie.html. Accessed 19 February 2016 .
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sekula, A.. (1982);, 'On the invention of photographic meaning'. , in V. Burgin. (ed.), Thinking Photography, London:: Macmillan;, pp. 84-109.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Shapiro, L.. (2010), Embodied Cognition, Florence:: Taylor and Francis;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Shipley, J. W.. (2015);, 'Selfie love: Public lives in an era of celebrity pleasure, violence, and social media'. , American Anthropologist, 117:2, pp. 403-13.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Solomon-Godeau, A.. (1984);, 'Photography after art photography'. , in B. Wallis. (ed.), Art After Modernism: Rethinking Representation, New York and Boston:: New Museum of Contemporary Art;, pp. 75-86.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Soper, K.. (1995), What is Nature?, Oxford:: Blackwell Publishers Ltd;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Szarkowski, J.. (1966), The Photographer's Eye, New York:: Museum of Modern Art;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Tagg, J.. (1988), The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories, London:: Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Thrift, N.. (2007), Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect, Hoboken:: Taylor and Francis;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Tucker, J.. (2005), Nature Exposed: Photography as Eyewitness in Victorian Science, Baltimore:: Johns Hopkins University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Uexküll, J. von. (2010), A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With A Theory of Meaning, Minneapolis and London:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Uimonen, P.. (2016);, '"I'm a picture girl": Mobile photography in Tanzania'. , in E. Gómez-Cruz, and A. Lehmuskallio. (eds), Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 19-34.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ulman, H. L.. (2016);, 'Beyond nature photography: The possibilities and responsibilities of seeing'. , in S. Rust,, S. Monani, and S. Cubitt. (eds), Ecomedia: Key Issues, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 27-46.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Varela, F. J.,, Thompson, E., and Rosch, E.. (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Verhoeff, N.. (2009);, 'Theoretical consoles: Concepts for gadget analysis'. , Journal of Visual Culture, 8:3, pp. 279-98.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Walton, K. L.. (1990), Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Universit Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Wheeler, W.. (2006), The Whole Creature: Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of Culture, London:: Lawrence & Wishart;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilder, K.. (2009), Photography and Science, London:: Reaktion Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wilson, R. A., and Foglia, L.. (2017);, 'Embodied cognition'. , The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2 March, 2017 ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/embodied-cognition/. Accessed 21 March 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Froese, Joachim. (2019);, 'Between nature and culture: Jakob von Uexküll's concept of Umwelten and how photography shapes our worlds'. , Philosophy of Photography, 10:1, pp. 11-22, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00003_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00003_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): biosemiotics; digital culture; embodied cognition; embodied material practice; Jakob von Uexküll; ontology of photography; selfie; subjective sentient worlds

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error