The politics of glitch in online networked images

References

1. Amel, VJ Um (2014), ‘Gaza audio-visual narrative by a cyborg: Images by hashtag’, https://vjumamel.com/portfolio/gaza-audio-visual-narrative-by-a-cyborg-images-by-hashtag/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
2. Andrew, Gretchen (2018), ‘Search engine art: Internet imperialism and the image in context’, in J. P. Bowen, J. Weinel, N. Lambert and G. Diprose (eds), Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, London, 9–13 July, London: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, pp. 92–95, https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/EVA2018.17. Accessed 1 September 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berlant, Lauren (2016), ‘The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34:3, pp. 393–419.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Butler, Judith (2004), Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Justice, London: Verso.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cabiscol, Laura (2020), ‘Gretchen Andrew, speaking the language of the internet’, CLOT Magazine, 5 September, https://clotmag.com/interviews/gretchen-andrew-speaking-the-language-of-the-internet. Accessed 1 September 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Collins, Patricia H. (2000), Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, New York and London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cubitt, Sean (2017), ‘Glitch’, Cultural Politics, 13:1, pp. 19–33.
   [Google Scholar]
8. D’Ignacio, Catherine and Klein, Lauren F. (2020), Data Feminism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dean, Jodi (2016), ‘Images without viewers: Selfie communism’, Fotomuseum Winterthur, 1 February, https://www.fotomuseum.ch/de/2016/02/01/images-without-viewers-selfie-communism-2/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dekker, Annet (2023a), ‘Precarious data aesthetics: An exploration of tactics, tricksters and idiocy in data’, in M. Kölmel and S. Hegenbart (eds), Dada Data: Contemporary Art Practice in the Era of Post-Truth Politics, New York: Bloomsbury, pp. 280–64.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dekker, Annet (2023b), ‘Re: thirst trap glitch GIF’, Permanent Beta, 21 February, https://www.permanentbeta.network/episode/173. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fetveit, Arild (2013a), ‘Medium-specific noise’, in L. Hausken (ed.), Thinking Media Aesthetics: Media Studies, Film Studies and the Arts, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 189–216.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fetveit, Arild (2013b), The Power of the Precarious Aesthetic, Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fetveit, Arild (2015), ‘Death, beauty, and iconoclastic nostalgia: Precarious aesthetics and Lana Del Rey’, NECSUS, 6 December, https://necsus-ejms.org/death-beauty-and-iconoclastic-nostalgia-precarious-aesthetics-and-lana-del-rey/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fuchs, Christian (2014), Social Media: A Critical Introduction, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gavin, Francesca (2018), ‘The artist whose works are inspired by Instagram’s algorithm’, Dazed Digital, 19 February, https://www.dazeddigital.com/art-photography/article/39095/1/artist-mandy-harris-williams-works-are-inspired-by-instagram-s-algorithm. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Giannachi, Gabriella (2021), Technologies of the Self-Portrait: Identity, Presence and the Construction of the Subject(s) in Twentieth and Twenty-first Century Art, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Goldstein, Caroline (2019), ‘How one “search engine artist” hacked her paintings into Frieze Los Angeles’s Google results’, Artnet, 12 February, https://news.artnet.com/market/frieze-los-angeles-gretchen-andrew-1462594. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goriunova, Olga and Shulgin, Alexei (2008), ‘Glitch’, in M. Fuller (ed.), Software Studies: A Lexicon, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 110–18.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio (2009), Commonwealth, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Honderich, Ted (ed.) (1995), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Horning, Rob (2013), ‘Google alert for the soul’, The New Inquiry, 12 April, https://thenewinquiry.com/google-alert-for-the-soul/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Horning, Rob (2018), ‘The price of shares’, Even Magazine, 27 July, http://evenmagazine.com/the-price-of-shares/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jones, Nathan A. (2022), Glitch Poetics, Media: Art: Write: Now, London: Open Humanity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lorey, Isabell (2015), State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mackenzie, Adrian and Anna, Munster (2019), ‘Platform seeing: Image ensembles and their invisualities’, Theory, Culture & Society, 26:5, pp. 3–22.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Marks, Laura U. (2010), Enfoldment and Infinity: An Islamic Geneaology of New Media Art, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Marks, Laura U. (2014), ‘Arab glitch’, in A. Downey (ed.), Uncommon Grounds: New Media and Critical Practices in North Africa and the Middle East, London and New York: I.B. Tauris, pp. 257–71.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Marks, Laura U. (2017), ‘Poor images, ad hoc archives, artists’ rights: The scrappy beauties of handmade digital culture’, International Journal of Communication, 11, pp. 3899–916.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Menkman, Rosa (2009), ‘Glitch studies manifesto’, http://amodern.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/2010_Original_Rosa-Menkman-Glitch-Studies-Manifesto.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2023.
31. Menkman, Rosa (2011), The Glitch Moment(um), Network Notebooks, 94, Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Noble, Safiya U. (2018), Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Parry, Richard (2021), ‘Episteme and techne’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/episteme-techne/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Russell, Legacy (2020), Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto, London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sakr, Laila S. (2018), Glitch Resistance on Metal: Codame Art + Tech Festival, Department of Film and Media Studies UC Santa Barbara, 4 June, https://www.filmandmedia.ucsb.edu/creative/glitch-resistance-on-metal/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sakr, Laila S. (2023), Arabic Glitch: Technoculture, Data Bodies, and Archives, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Nadera (2019), Incarcerated Childhood and the Politics of Unchilding, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Steyerl, Hito (2009), ‘In defense of the poor image’, e-flux Journal, 10 November, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/10/61362/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/. Accessed 6 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Troemel, Brad (2013), ‘Athletic aesthetic’, The New Inquiry, 19 August, pp. 24–33.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Williams, Mandy H. (2021), ‘Re modeling’, Topical Cream, 9 September, https://topicalcream.org/features/re-modeling/. Accessed 1 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]