After the glitch: Photographic friction in Lisa Tan’s Dodge and/or Burn

References

1. Alloa, Emmanuel (2011), ‘Verktyg – skrift – element: Från en fenomenologi om medier till en medial fenomenologi’, in L. Dahlberg and H. Ruin (eds), Fenomenologi, teknik och medialitet, Södertörn: Södertörn University, pp. 117–42.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andrews, Jorella (2011), ‘The photographic stare’, Philosophy of Photography, 2:1, pp. 41–56, https://doi.org/10.1386/pop.2.1.41_1.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Austin, John L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barthes, Roland (1980), Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, New York: Hill and Wang.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Betancourt, Michael (2017), Glitch Art in Theory and Practice: Critical Failures and Post-Digital Aesthetics, London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Butler, Judith (1988), ‘Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory’, Theatre Journal, 40:4, pp. 519–31, https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Certeau, Michel de (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cubitt, Sean (2017), ‘Glitch’, Cultural Politics, 13:1, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-3755156.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dodge and/or Burn (2023–24), Accelerator, Stockholm, 16 September 2023–11 February 2024, https://acceleratorsu.art/en/utstallning/dodge-and-or-burn/. Accessed 10 November 2023.
10. Fedorova, Ksenia (2020), Tactics of Interfacing: Encoding Affect in Art and Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Flyvbjerg, Bent (2011), ‘Case study’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 301–16.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Galloway, Alexander R. (2004), Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Garcia, David (2013), ‘Re-reading de Certeau: Invisible tactics’, Tactical Media Files, 20 May, http://blog.tacticalmediafiles.net/index.php/2013/05/20/re-reading-de-certeau-invisible-tactics. Accessed 10 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
14. ‘glitch, n.’ (2023), OED Online, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oed.com/search/advanced/Entries?scope=HistoricalThesaurus&q=glitch. Accessed 10 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grundell, Vendela (2016), Flow and Friction: On the Tactical Potential of Interfacing with Glitch Art, Stockholm: Art and Theory Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grundell, Vendela (2018), ‘Navigating darkness: A photographic response to visual impairment’, Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 14:3, pp. 193–210, http://liminalities.net/14-3/darkness.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Grundell Gachoud, Vendela (2022), ‘Unruly images: The activist visuality of glitches and disabilities on Instagram’, in S. Hartle and D. White (eds), Visual Activism in the 21st Century: Art, Protest and Resistance in an Uncertain World, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 282–300.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Smith, Richard M. (2016), ‘Rethinking “cure” and “accommodation”’, in B. Arneil and N. J. Hirschmann (eds), Disability and Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–84.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Iversen, Margaret (2007), ‘Following pieces: On performative photography’, in J. Elkins (ed.), Photography Theory, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 91–108.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kane, Carolyn L. (2019), High-Tech Trash: Glitch, Noise, and Aesthetic Failure, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kellner, Therese (2023), interview and personal tour of the exhibition with V. Grundell Gachoud, Accelerator, 26 September.
22. Kelly, Caleb (2009), Cracked Media: The Sound of Malfunction, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Krapp, Peter (2011), Noise Channels: Glitch and Error in Digital Culture, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Manon, Hugh S. and Temkin, Daniel (2011), ‘Notes on glitch’, World Picture, 6, Winter, n.pag., http://worldpicturejournal.com/article/notes-on-glitch. Accessed 10 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Marks, Laura U. (2002), Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. McRuer, Robert (2006), Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McRuer, Robert (2018), Crip Times: Disability, Globalization, and Resistance, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Meeken, Luke A. and Knochel, Aaron D. (2022), ‘Glitching form: Subverting digital systems that capture the physical world’, Art Education, 75:4, pp. 49–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2022.2053478.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mirzoeff, Nicholas (2006), ‘On visuality’, Journal of Visual Culture, 5:1, pp. 53–79, https://doi.org/10.1177/14704129060622.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mitchell, William J. T. (2005), ‘There are no visual media’, Journal of Visual Culture, 4:2, pp. 257–66, https://doi.org/10.1177/14704129050546.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pasek, Anne (2017), ‘The pencil of error: Glitch aesthetics and post-liquid intelligence’, Photography and Culture, 10:1, pp. 37–52, https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2017.1295711.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Preece, Chloe and Whittaker, Laryssa (2023), ‘Towards glitch pedagogy’, Journal of Marketing Management, 39:1–2, pp. 68–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2023.2174165.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rutten, Ellen and Vos, Ruby de (2023), ‘Trash, dirt, glitch: The imperfect turn’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 26:1, pp. 3–13, https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231152371.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Schneider, Rebecca (2011), Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Shusterman, Richard (2012), ‘Photography as performative process’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 70:1, pp. 67–77, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2011.01499.x.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Siebers, Tobin (2006), ‘Disability aesthetics’, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 7:2, pp. 63–73, http://www.jcrt.org/archives/07.2/siebers.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Siebers, Tobin (2008), Disability Theory, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tan, Lisa (2001–12), Letters from Dr. Bamberger, installation, Accelerator, Stockholm, 16 September 2023–11 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tan, Lisa (2019/2023), Waiting Room, photography, Accelerator, Stockholm, 16 September 2023–11 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Tan, Lisa (2021–23), Dodge and Burn, video installation, Accelerator, Stockholm, 16 September 2023–11 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Tan, Lisa (2023a), ‘Current work’, Lisa Tan Official Website, https://lisatan.net/current-work.html. Accessed 10 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tan, Lisa (2023b), interview with V. Grundell Gachoud, Zoom, 28 September.
43. Tan, Lisa (2023c), Pa, installation, Accelerator, Stockholm, 16 September 2023–11 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tan, Lisa (2023d), Promise or Threat, installation, Accelerator, Stockholm, 16 September 2023–11 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]