The 1979 American Punk Art dispute: Visions of punk art between sensationalism, street art and social practice | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 9, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2044-1983
  • E-ISSN: 2044-3706

Abstract

Abstract

In May 1979, a conflict arose in Amsterdam: the makers of the exhibition clashed with local artists, who disagreed with how the curators portrayed the punk movement in their promotion of the show. The conflict lays open many of the inherent (self-) contradictory aspects of punk art. It was not merely the ubiquitous ‘hard school vs. art school’ punk dispute, but that the Amsterdam punk group responsible for the letter and the Americans preparing the exhibition had different visions of what punk art was or should be in respect to content and agency. Drawing on interviews with the protagonists themselves and research in their private archives, this article compares those visions, considering topics like institutionalism vs. street art, avantgarde history vs. tabloid contemporality and political vs. apolitical stances. The article shows how the involved protagonists from New York and Amsterdam drew on different art historical backgrounds, each rooted in the 1960s: Pop Art, especially Andy Warhol, played a significant role in New York, whereas the signature poetic-social art of CoBrA and the anarchistic activity of the Provos were influential in Amsterdam. The analysis reflects how punk manifested differently in different cultural spheres, but it also points to a common ground, which might be easier to see from today’s distance of more than forty years.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/punk_00061_1
2020-11-01
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/punk_00061_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): American Punk Art; art; CoBrA; exhibition; KoeCrandt; Pop Art; Provos; punk
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error