Notes from Notes on Blindness: The challenges of the in-house¹ film production model in independent cinema

References

1. Andrew, J. D.. ( 1984), Concepts in Film Theory, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Banks, M.. ( 2010;), ‘ Craft labour and creative industries. ’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16:3, pp. 305–21.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Burch, N.. ( 2014), Theory of Film Practice, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Caldwell, J. T.. ( 2008), Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Caldwell, J. T.,, Mayer, V., and Banks, M. J.. ( 2009;), ‘ “Both sides of the fence”. Blurred distinctions in scholarship and production (a portfolio of interviews). ’, in J. T. Caldwell,, V. Mayer, and M. J. Banks. (eds), Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 214–30.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Campbell, R.. ( 2014;), ‘ 2014 predictions: The year ahead for production. ’, Campaign, 9 January, http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/1226189/2014-predictions-year-ahead-forproduction. Accessed 3 April 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Casetti, F.. ( 2007;), ‘ Theory, post-theory, neo-theories: Changes in discourses, changes in objects. ’, Cinémas: Revue d’études cinématographiquesCinémas (Journal of Film Studies. Cinémas), 17:2&3, pp. 33–45.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Clifford, J., and Marcus, G. E.. ( 1986), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Couldry, N.. ( 2008), Actor Network Theory and Media: Do They Connect and on What Terms?, New York:: Hampton Press, Inc;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Creative England ( 2016), Creative England 50 – 2016, Bristol:: Creative England;, http://www.applications.creativeengland.co.uk/assets/public/resource/233.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Elsaesser, T., and Hagener, M.. ( 2015), Film Theory: An Introduction through the Senses, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Geertz, C.. ( 1994;), ‘ Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. ’, in C. Geertz. (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 213–31.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Geertz, C.. ( 2005;), ‘ Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. ’, Daedalus, 134:4, pp. 56–86.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hesmondhalgh, D., and Baker, S.. ( 2010;), ‘ “A very complicated version of freedom”: Conditions and experiences of creative labour in three cultural industries. ’, Poetics, 38:1, pp. 4–20.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hesmondhalgh, D., and Baker, S.. ( 2011), Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. King, G.. ( 2013), Indie 2.0: Change and Continuity in Contemporary American Indie Film, London:: IB Tauris;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Law, J., and Hassard, J.. ( 1999), Actor Network Theory and After, Hoboken, NJ:: Blackwell Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lucas, R. C.. ( 2011;), ‘ Crafting digital cinema: Cinematographers in contemporary Hollywood. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Austin, TX:: University of Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mayer, V.,, Banks, M. J., and Caldwell, J. T.. ( 2010), Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mead, M.. ( 1995;), ‘ Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. ’, in M. Mead. (ed.), Principles of Visual Anthropology, Berlin:: Mouton de Gruyter;, pp. 3–10.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Moore, S. F.. ( 1987;), ‘ Explaining the present: Theoretical dilemmas in processual ethnography. ’, American Ethnologist, 14:4, pp. 727–36.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Okely, J., and Callaway, H.. ( 1992), Anthropology and Autobiography, London:: Psychology Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Petkoviç, D.. ( 2017), Weathering the Maelstrom: The Effect of Digital Workflows on Craft Identity in Independent Cinema, London:: University of Greenwich;.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Saundry, R.,, Stuart, M., and Antcliff, V.. ( 2007;), ‘ Broadcasting discontent – Freelancers, trade unions and the Internet. ’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 22:2, pp. 178–91.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Seldes, G.. ( 1962), The Seven Lively Arts, New York:: AS Barnes;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sennett, R.. ( 2008), The Craftsman, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sporton, G.. ( 2015), Digital Creativity: Something from Nothing, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Strandvad, S. M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Analyzing production from a socio-material perspective. ’, in S. M. Strandvad. (ed.), Behind the Screen, New York:: Springer;, pp. 27–43.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Thompson, D.. ( 2014;), ‘ The reason why Hollywood makes so many boring superhero movies. ’, The Atlantic, 13 May, https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/05/hollywoods-real-superhero-problem/370785/. Accessed 3 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Tzioumakis, Y.. ( 2006;), ‘ American independent cinema. ’, in Y. Tzioumakis. (ed.), An Introduction, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh Univesity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Wittkower, R., and Wittkower, M.. ( 2006), Born under Saturn: The Character and Conduct of Artists: A Documented History from Antiquity to the French Revolution, New York:: New York Review of Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Petkovic, Dusan. ( 2018;), ‘ Notes from Notes on Blindness: The challenges of the in-house film production model in independent cinema. ’, Scene, 6:2, pp. 121–131, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/scene_00013_1
    [Google Scholar]