Everyday divine: Fashion, ritual and identity transformation | Intellect Skip to content
1981
1-2: The Art of Making: Methods for Research
  • ISSN: 2044-3714
  • E-ISSN: 2044-3722

Abstract

As the world experiences the end of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown era, I have been conducting a project that investigates the function and meaning of the creative making process. Using the steps to making as the research focus, I ask: why does designing and crafting feel and function like a change-making ritual, more than a routine? What evidence of the metamorphic energy of making lies within each finished creation? Through a review of other scholars’ work, from fields including ritual study, psychology, art and pedagogy, I began to understand the process of creation, and how it can promote positive transformation. Most important of all is the transformation of materials, ideas and inspiration into millinery. To begin, I found that the art of creative research propels the maker into a liminal stew of ideas and actions, where only the forces for and against the act of making are evident. The choices of materials and applications gather increasingly on the studio table, and the question of the meaning behind the process grows curiously deeper…

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00059_1
2024-03-07
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bridgland, V. M. E., Moeck, E. K., Green, D. M., Swain, T. L., Nayda, D. M., Matson, L. A., Hutchison, N. P. and Takarangi, M. K. T. (2021), ‘Why the COVID-19 pandemic is a traumatic stressor’, PLoS ONE, 16:1, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240146.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaney, D. and Goulding, C. (2016), ‘Dress, transformation, and conformity in the heavy rock subculture’, Journal of Business Research, 69:1, pp. 15565, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.029.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Entwistle, J. (2015), The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress & Modern Social Theory, Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D. and Inzlicht, M. (2017), ‘The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22:3, https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317734944.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kollnitz, A. and Pecorari, M. (eds) (2021), Fashion, Performance, and Performativity: The Complex Spaces of Fashion, New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lazlo, E. (2008), Quantum Shift in the Global Brain: How the New Scientific Reality Can Change Us and Our World, Rochester, NY: Inner Traditions.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Linfante, V. (2020), ‘Fading, mixing, slicing, and looping: The deconstruction of fashion through the creative process of music’, ZoneModa Journal, 10:1, pp. 7999, https://zmj.unibo.it/article/view/11090. Accessed 12 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mahatma, M. and Saari, Z. (2021), ‘Embodied religious belief: The experience of Syahadatain Sufi order in Indonesia’, Journal UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 6, pp. 87100, https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v6i1.13462.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mak, H. W., Fluharty, M. and Fancourt, D. (2021), ‘Predictors and impact of arts engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analyses of data from 19,384 adults in the COVID-19 social study’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626263.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Marjanen, P. and Metsarinne, M. (2019), ‘The development of craft education in Finnish schools’, Nordic Journal of Educational History, 6:1, pp. 4970, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1724893/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Morrison, S. S. (2015), ‘The secret life of objects: The audacity of thingness and the poignancy of materiality’, in The Literature of Waste, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 12138, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394446_10.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Munroe, N. H. (2022), ‘Lovers, legends, and looms’, The Routledge Companion to Fashion Studies, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pecorari, M. and Kollnitz, A. (eds) (2022), Fashion, Performance, & Performativity: The Complex Spaces of Fashion, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Truman, S. E. (2020), ‘In conversation with Natalie Loveless, Erin Manning, Natasha Myers, and Stephanie Springgay: The intimacies of doing research-creation’, Knowings and Knots: Methodologies and Ecologies in Research-Creation, Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, https://thepedagogicalimpulse.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Loveless_Knowings_TRUMAN-3.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tuomi-Grohn, T. (2008), Reinventing Art of Everyday Making, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson, E. (2003), Adorned in Dreams: Fashion and Modernity, New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yale School of Medicine (2022), ‘COVID-19 and PTSD: Assessing the pandemic’s toll on mental health’, Yale School of Medicine Online Journal, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/covid-19-and-ptsd-assessing-the-pandemics-toll-on-mental-health/. Accessed 16 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00059_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00059_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): design; dress; making; millinery; new materialism; research creation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error