Generating transition policy scenarios for university–industry collaboration in Iran using systems thinking | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development
  4. Volume 21, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 21, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1474-2748
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0551

Abstract

The aim of this study is to build a dynamic systems model (DSM) in order to construct scenarios for the future of university–industry collaboration (UIC) in Iran. A mixed research methodology was used and Fahey and Randall’s (1998) six stages of scenario development were followed. To identify the key variables (forces that contribute to the promotion of UIC), the relevant innovation systems theories and literature related to UIC considering macro and micro environment was explored. A questionnaire was designed to identify the scenario driving forces of UIC in Iran and 90 respondents participated from both university and industry side. In order to construct a DSM based on Iranian context, generating and interpreting scenarios, 25 interviews were conducted with the major players of UIC including university professors, industrial experts and also experts from government institution associated with two Iranian cluster industries (Automotive and Biotechnology). These experts were selected based on a snowball sampling technique. Theme analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data and generate scenarios. A set of evolved states (exploratory and future-backwards scenarios) served to illustrate the plausible futures of UIC in Iran, and therefore to inform an improvement agenda for UIC activities.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00059_1
2023-01-31
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abd Razak, A., and Saad, M.. ( 2009;), ‘ The role of universities and their issues and challenges in directing regional economic development: The case of Malaysia. ’, Triple Helix 7th Biennial International Conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages, Glasgow, Scotland, 17–19 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkali, U.. ( 2021;), ‘ Development of university-industry interactions for knowledge-based economy in Nigeria. ’, International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 20:3, pp. 265–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arenaz, J. J., and Gonzalez, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ Technology transfer models and elements in the university-industry collaboration. ’, Administrative Science, 8:19, pp. 3–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashyrov, G.,, Alunurm, R.,, Pentus, K., and Vadi, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ The future of university–industry collaboration: Scenario analysis based on case of Estonia. ’, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17:4, pp. 421–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baghernejad, J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Cultivating technological innovations in Middle Eastern countries: Factors affecting firm’s technological innovation behaviour in Iran. ’, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 13:4, pp. 361–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bodas Freitas, I. M., and Verspagen, B.. ( 2017;), ‘ The motivation, institutions and organisation of university-industry collaboration in the Netherlands. ’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27:3, pp. 379–412.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowman, K.,, Chettleborough, J.,, Jeans, H.,, Rowlands, J., and Whitehead, J.. ( 2015), Systems Thinking: An introduction for Oxfam Programme Staff, London:: Oxfam;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, R., and Smith, M.. ( 2009;), ‘ Exploratory techniques for examining clusters: A systems thinking approach. ’, Triple Helix 7th Biennial International Conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages, Glasgow, Scotland:, 17–19 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bulumac, E., and Bendis, R.. ( 2001), Utilizing Technology Transfer to Develop Small and Medium Enterprises, Amsterdam:: IOS Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Carayannis, E. G.,, Grigoroudis, E.,, Campbell, D. F. J.,, Meissner, D., and Stamati, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. ’, R&D Management, 48:1, pp. 148–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang, C. W., and Chuang, C. M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Re-interpreting signaling with systems thinking: A concept for improving decision-making quality. ’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 31:3, pp. 47–357.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chermack, T. J.. ( 2004;), ‘ Improving decision-making with scenario planning. ’, Futures, 36:3, pp. 295–309.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Debackere, K., and Veugelers, R.. ( 2005;), ‘ The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. ’, Research Policy, 34:3, pp. 321–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Decter, M.,, Bennet, D., and Leseure, M.. ( 2007;), ‘ University to business technology transfer: UK and USA comparisons. ’, Technovation, 27:3, pp. 145–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Drucker, P.. ( 1995), Managing in a Time of Great Change, New York:: TT Dutton;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dutse, A. Y.,, Bayero, M. M.,, Musa, K. I., and Jibrin, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ University-industry linkages, enabling policies and innovative behaviours of universities in Nigeria. ’, International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 20:3, pp. 305–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dzisah, J., and Etzkowitz, H.. ( 2008;), ‘ Triple Helix circulation: The heart of innovation and development. ’, International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 7:2, pp. 101–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Edgar, G., and Kharazmi, O. A.. ( 2022;), ‘ Systems evaluation of university-industry collaboration efficiency in Iran: Current situation and proposed policy framework. ’, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00873-z.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. A.. ( 2000;), ‘ The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. ’, Research Policy, 29:2, pp. 109–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Fahey, L., and Randall, R. M.. ( 1998), Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight Scenarios, New York:: John Wiley & Sons;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fathi, M. R.,, Maleki, M. H.,, Sobhani, S. M., and Koksalm, C. D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Future study of operations research based on scenario planning and soft systems methodology. ’, Foresight, 22:2, pp. 223–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fink, A.,, Marr, B.,, Siebe, A., and Kuhle, J. P.. ( 2005;), ‘ The future scorecard: Combining external and internal scenarios to create strategic foresight. ’, Management Decision, 43:3, pp. 360–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Freeman, C.. ( 1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London:: Frances Pinter;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Freitas, I. M. B.,, Verspagen, B., and Merit, U.. ( 2009;), ‘ Overcoming institutional shortcomings for academic spin-offs policies in Brazil. ’, Triple Helix 7th Biennial International Conference on University, Industry and Government linkages, Glasgow, Scotland, 17–19 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Galanakis, K.. ( 2006;), ‘ Innovation process: Make sense using system thinking. ’, Technovation, 26:11, pp. 1222–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Geuna, A., and Nesta, L.. ( 2006;), ‘ University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. ’, Research Policy, 35:6, pp. 790–807.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gibbons, M.. ( 1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London:: Sage Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gilandeh, A.,, Kharazmi, O. A.,, Yazdani, M. H., and Roshan Roudi, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Evaluation of innovative city formation in Mashhad, Iran in 2015 horizon. ’, Journal of Geography, Urban and Regional Spatial Planning, 25:7, pp. 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Harper, J. C., and Georghiou, L.. ( 2005;), ‘ Foresight in innovation policy: Shared visions for a science park and business-university links in a city region. ’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17:2, pp. 147–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hertzfeld, H. R.,, Link, A. N, and Vonortas, N. S.. ( 2006;), ‘ Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. ’, Research Policy, 35:6, pp. 825–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Jankowsaka, B.,, Matysek-Jedrych, A., and Mroczek-Dabrowska, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Efficiency of national innovation systems: Poland and Bulgaria in the context of the Global Innovation Index. ’, Comparative Economic Research, 20:3, pp. 77–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kharazmi, O. A., and Nedayi, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Evaluation of innovation infrastructure in Iran: Case of incubator centers in Mashhad city. ’, Journal of Studies of Geography in arid Regions, 3:12, pp. 103–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuwashima, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Open innovation and the emergence of a new type of university–industry collaboration in Japan. ’, Annals of Business Administrative Science, 17:3, pp. 95–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee, T. L., and Tunzelmann, N. V.. ( 2005;), ‘ A dynamic analytic approach to national innovation systems: The IC industry in Taiwan. ’, Research Policy, 34:4, pp. 425–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Leydesdorff, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ The knowledge base of an economy: What is it? Can it be measured? Can it be modeled?. ’, Amsterdam School of Communications Research, 11 October, http://www.leydesdorff.net. Accessed 28 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lima, M. C., and Filho, H. N. H.. ( 2009;), ‘ Challenges and opportunities in the creation of sustainable technology park in an immature local system of innovation: The case of Technovia, Brazil. ’, Triple Helix 7th Biennial International Conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages, Glasgow, Scotland, 17–19 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lundvall, B.. ( 1992), National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London:: Frances Pinter;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. MacKay, B., and Tambeau, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ A structuration approach to scenario praxis. ’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80:4, pp. 673–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Mahmud, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ City foresight and development planning case study: Implementation of scenario planning in formulation of the Bulungan development plan. ’, Futures, 43, pp. 697–706.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Marton, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ The education and practice of futures studies in Estonia. ’, Society and Economy, 40:2, pp. 271–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. McAdam, M., and Debackere, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Beyond “triple helix” toward “quadruple helix” models in regional innovation systems: Implications for theory and practice. ’, R&M management, 48:1, pp. 3–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Meissner, D.,, Erdil, E., and Chataway, J.. ( 2018), Innovation and Entrepreneurial University, Berlin:: Springer;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Mietzner, D., and Reger, G.. ( 2005;), ‘ Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight. ’, International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 1:2, pp. 220–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Miles, I.,, Saritas, O., and Sokolov, A.. ( 2016), Foresight for Science, Technology and Innovation, Berlin:: Springer;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mitra, J., and Formica, P.. ( 1997), Innovation and Economic Development: University-Enterprise Partnerships in Action, Dublin:: Oak Tree Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Moradi, Y., and Noori, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Entrepreneurial cooperation model between university and SMEs: A case study in Iran. ’, Sustainability, 12:92140, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Myers, M. D.. ( 2013), Qualitative Research in Business and Management, London:: Sage Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Patching, D.. ( 1990), Practical Soft Systems Analysis, London:: Pitman Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Paya, A., and Baradaran Shoraka, H. R.. ( 2009;), ‘ Future studies in Iran: Learning through trial and error. ’, Futures, 42:5, pp. 484–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K.. ( 2007;), ‘ University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. ’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9:4, pp. 259–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Plewa, C., and Quester, P.. ( 2007;), ‘ Key drivers of university-industry relationships: The role of organisational compatibility and personal experience. ’, Journal of Service Marketing, 21:5, pp. 370–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Porter, M. E.. ( 1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York:: Free Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ramirez, R., and Selin, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ Plausibility and probability in scenario planning. ’, Foresight, 16:1, pp. 54–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ratcliffe, J.. ( 2000;), ‘ Scenario building: A suitable method for strategic property planning. ’, Property Management, 18:2, pp. 127–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Rooks, G., and Oerlemans, L.. ( 2005;), ‘ South Africa: A rising star? Assessing the X-effectiveness of South Africa’s National System of Innovation. ’, European Planning Studies, 13:8, pp. 1205–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Saad, M., and Zawdie, G.. ( 2005;), ‘ From technology transfer to the emergence of a Triple Helix culture: The experience of Algeria in innovation and technological capability development. ’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17:1, pp. 89–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Schaveling, J., and Bryan, B.. ( 2018), Making Better Decisions using Systems Thinking How to Stop Firefighting, Deal with Root Causes and Deliver Permanent Solutions, Zurich:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Senge, P. M.. ( 1990), The Fifth Discipline, The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation, , 1st ed.., New York:: Doubleday;.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Sharif, N.. ( 2006;), ‘ Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept. ’, Research Policy, 35:5, pp. 745–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. United Nations ( 2006;), ‘ Summary of deliberations on the science, technology and innovation policy review of the Islamic Republic of Iran. ’, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, 5 January, http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/c2d69_en.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Viotti, E. B.. ( 2002;), ‘ National learning systems: A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. ’, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69:7, pp. 653–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Walton, S.,, O’Kane, P., and Ruwhiu, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ Developing a theory of plausibility in scenario building: Designing plausible scenarios. ’, Futures, 111:7, pp. 42–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. White, D.. ( 1995;), ‘ Application of systems thinking to risk management: A review of the literature. ’, Management Decision, 33:10, pp. 35–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Wignaraja, G.. ( 2003), Competitiveness Strategy in Developing Countries, , 1st ed.., New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Wirsich, A.,, Kock, A.,, Strumann, C., and Schultz, C.. ( 2016;), ‘ Effects of university–industry collaboration on technological newness of firms. ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33:6, pp. 708–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. World Economic Forum ( 2018), The Global Competitiveness Report, Geneva:: World Economic Forum;, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017-2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. World Economic Forum ( 2019), The Global Competitiveness Report, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Wright, A.. ( 2005;), ‘ Using scenarios to challenge and change management thinking. ’, Total Quality Management, 16:1, pp. 87–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Edgar, Gerry, and Kharazmi, Omid Ali. ( 2022;), ‘ Generating transition policy scenarios for university–industry collaboration in Iran using systems thinking. ’, International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 21:3, pp. 255–86, https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00059_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00059_1
Loading
Generating transition policy scenarios for university–industry collaboration in Iran using systems thinking
International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 21, 255 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00059_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00059_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00059_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): cluster industries; future; innovation systems; Iran; systems model; university

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error