Virtual nature, inner forest: Prospects for immersive virtual nature art and well-being | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Virtual Creativity
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
XR and Creativity: Transformative Technologies for Good
  • ISSN: 2397-9704
  • E-ISSN: 2397-9712

Abstract

Over a number of decades, studies have revealed compelling relationships between experiences of the natural environment and positive health outcomes in adult communities. These psychosocial health benefits have typically been described via key theoretical frameworks in the health sciences, such as the biophilia hypothesis. Despite the body of evidence for nature design and well-being, propositions for immersive virtual nature experiences are still emerging across the fields of creativity and health. In this article, we identify the potential for immersive virtual nature art as a creative well-being intervention, articulated through a discussion of background literature and concepts leading to the development of our artwork, (2020–21). This article incorporates a transdisciplinary suite of perspectives across three key parts; in the first section, we review key health and design research around beneficial nature experiences, with particular emphasis on designing technological nature. Secondly, we propose considerations for immersive virtual nature experiences, as distinct from prior iterations of technological nature; these considerations are framed through discussion of our artistic and well-being rationale for designing the collaborative artwork This extended reality (XR) project was developed in response to well-being challenges such as social isolation and restricted nature access- of particular valence during the COVID-19 pandemic. The artwork incorporates multisensory, aesthetic elements drawn from biophilic design guidelineswhich support creative, evidence-based approaches to designed nature and societal health. To conclude this article, we report on prospects for further scaling of the artwork, with ongoing scope to contribute to both nature-health design and immersive virtual nature art practices.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00046_1
2021-06-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, S. J. G.,, Bostick, J.,, Ogle, E.,, Nowak, K. L.,, McGillicuddy, K. T., and Bailenson, J. N.. ( 2016;), ‘ Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21:6, pp. 399–419.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Antonelli, M.,, Barbieri, G., and Donelli, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ Effects of forest bathing (shinrin-yoku) on levels of cortisol as a stress biomarker: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ’, International Journal of Biometeorology, 63:8, pp. 1117–134.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachelard, G.. ( 2014), The Poetics of Space, New York:: Penguin Classics;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bratman, G. N.,, Hamilton, J. P., and Daily, G. C.. ( 2012;), ‘ The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. ’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249:1, pp. 118–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, D. K.,, Barton, J. L., and Gladwell, V. F.. ( 2013;), ‘ Viewing nature scenes positively affects recovery of autonomic function following acute-mental stress. ’, Environmental Science and Technology, 47:11, pp. 5562–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Browning, M. H. E. M.,, Mimnaugh, K. J.,, van Riper, C. J.,, Laurent, H. K., and LaValle, S. M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Can simulated nature support mental health? Comparing short, single-doses of 360-degree nature videos in virtual reality with the outdoors. ’, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, p. 2667, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02667. Accessed 11 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Browning, W. D.,, Ryan, C. O., and Clancy, J. O.. ( 2014), 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design, New York:: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Coles, L. L., and Pasquier, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Digital eco-art: Transformative possibilities. ’, Digital Creativity, 26:1, pp. 3–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Colfer, C. J. P.,, Sheil, D., and Kishi, M.. ( 2006), Forests and Human Health Assessing the Evidence, Jakarta:: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR);.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Coyne, R.. ( 2018), Network Nature: The Place of Nature in the Digital Age, London:: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc;, https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350029507.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, C.. ( 1998a;), ‘ Changing space: Virtual reality as an arena of embodied being. ’, in J. Beckmann. (ed.), The Virtual Dimension: Architecture, Representation, and Crash Culture, New York:: Princeton Architectural Press;, pp. 144–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, C.. ( 1998b;), ‘ OSMOSE: Notes on being in immersive virtual space. ’, Digital Creativity, 9:2, pp. 65–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Douglas, M.,, Katikireddi, S. V.,, Taulbut, M.,, McKee, M., and McCartney, G.. ( 2020;), ‘ Mitigating the wider health effects of COVID-19 pandemic response. ’, BMJ, 2020:369, p. m1557, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1557. Accessed 11 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Downton, P.,, Jones, D.,, Zeunert, J., and Roös, P.. ( 2017;), ‘ Biophilic design applications: Putting theory and patterns into built environment practice. ’, KnE Engineering, 2:2, pp. 59–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilbert, N.. ( 2016;), ‘ Green space: A natural high. ’, Nature, 531:7594, pp. S56–S57.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilbert, P.. ( 2014;), ‘ The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. ’, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53:1, pp. 6–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Golembiewski, J. A.. ( 2010;), ‘ Start making sense: Applying a salutogenic model to architectural design for psychiatric care. ’, Facilities, 28:3&4, pp. 100–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Golembiewski, J. A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Salutogenic architecture in healthcare settings. ’, in M. B. Mittelmark,, S. Sagy,, M. Eriksson,, G. F. Bauer,, J. M. Pelikan,, B. Lindström, and G. A. Espnes. (eds), The Handbook of Salutogenesis, Cham:: Springer;, pp. 267–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grau, O.. ( 2003), Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion, Cambridge, MA and London:: The MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Han, J.-W.,, Choi, H.,, Jeon, Y.-H.,, Yoon, C.-H.,, Woo, J.-M., and Kim, W.. ( 2016;), ‘ The effects of forest therapy on coping with chronic widespread pain: Physiological and psychological differences between participants in a forest therapy program and a control group. ’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13:3, p. 255.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Haraway, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. ’, Environmental Humanities, 6:1, pp. 159–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hartig, T.,, van den Berg, A. E.,, Hagerhall, C. M.,, Tomalak, M.,, Bauer, N.,, Hansmann, R.,, Ojala, A.,, Syngollitou, E.,, Carrus, G., and van Herzele, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Health benefits of nature experience: Psychological, social and cultural processes. ’, in K. Nilsson,, M. Sangster,, C. Gallis,, T. Hartig,, S. De Vries,, K. Seeland, and J. Schipperijn. (eds), Forests, Trees and Human Health, New York:: Springer;, pp. 127–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. James, E., and Morel, E.. ( 2020), Environment and Narrative: New Essays in Econarratology, Columbus, OH:: The Ohio State University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kahn, P. H.. ( 2011), Technological Nature: Adaptation and the Future of Human Life, Cambridge, MA and London:: The MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kahn, P. H.,, Severson, R. L., and Ruckert, J. H.. ( 2009;), ‘ The human relation with nature and technological nature. ’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18:1, pp. 37–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Keenan, J. M.. ( 2020;), ‘ COVID, resilience, and the built environment. ’, Environment Systems and Decisions, 40:2, pp. 216–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kellert, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Biophilic urbanism: The potential to transform. ’, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5:1, pp. 4–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kellert, S. R., and Wilson, E. O.. ( 1993), The Biophilia Hypothesis, Washington, DC:: Island Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kjellgren, A., and Buhrkall, H.. ( 2010;), ‘ A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. ’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30:4, pp. 464–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mattila, O.,, Korhonen, A.,, Pöyry, E.,, Hauru, K.,, Holopainen, J., and Parvinen, P.. ( 2020;), ‘ Restoration in a virtual reality forest environment. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 107, p. 106295.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mayer, F. S., and Frantz, C. M.. ( 2004;), ‘ The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. ’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24:4, pp. 503–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Mayer, F. S.,, Frantz, C. M.,, Bruehlman-Senecal, E., and Dolliver, K.. ( 2008;), ‘ Why is nature beneficial?. ’, Environment and Behavior, 41:5, pp. 607–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. McAllister, E.,, Bhullar, N., and Schutte, N. S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Into the woods or a stroll in the park: How virtual contact with nature impacts positive and negative affect. ’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14:7, p. 786.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. McRobert, L.. ( 2007), Char Davies’ Immersive Virtual Art and the Essence of Spatiality, Canada:: University of Toronto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mishkind, M. C.,, Norr, A. M.,, Katz, A. C., and Reger, G. M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Review of virtual reality treatment in psychiatry: Evidence versus current diffusion and use. ’, Current Psychiatry Reports, 19:11, p. 80.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Morina, N.,, Ijntema, H.,, Meyerbröker, K., and Emmelkamp, P. M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Can virtual reality exposure therapy gains be generalized to real-life? A meta-analysis of studies applying behavioral assessments. ’, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 74, pp. 18–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Rafferty, P.. ( 2017;), ‘ Virtual reality // healing practice: An interview with Char Davies. ’, Berlin Art Link , 4 January, https://www.berlinartlink.com/2017/01/04/virtual-reality-healing-practice-an-interview-with-char-davies/. Accessed 11 March 2021.
  38. Reid, W. V.,, Mooney, H. A.,, Cropper, A.,, Capistrano, D.,, Carpenter, S. R.,, Chopra, K.,, Dasgupta, P.,, Dietz, T.,, Duraiappah, A. K., and Hassan, R.. ( 2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being-Synthesis: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington, DC:: Island Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ryan, M.-L.. ( 2015), Narrative as Virtual Reality 2: Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media, Baltimore, MD:: JHU Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Salmon, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Nature’s transcendent image the art (and technology) of self realization. ’, International Review of African American Art, 23:3, pp. 19–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sangha, K. K.,, Le Brocque, A.,, Costanza, R., and Cadet-James, Y.. ( 2015;), ‘ Ecosystems and indigenous well-being: An integrated framework. ’, Global Ecology and Conservation, 4, pp. 197–206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.06.008. Accessed 11 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Schutte, N.,, Bhullar, N.,, Stilinović, E. J., and Richardson, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ The impact of virtual environments on restorativeness and affect. ’, Ecopsychology, 9:1, pp. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2016.0042. Accessed 11 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Scott, T. L.,, Masser, B. M., and Pachana, N. A.. ( 2014;), ‘ Multisensory installations in residential aged-care facilities: Increasing novelty and encouraging social engagement through modest environmental changes. ’, Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 40:9, pp. 20–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Seabrook, E.,, Kelly, R.,, Foley, F.,, Theiler, S.,, Thomas, N.,, Wadley, G., and Nedeljkovic, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Understanding how virtual reality can support mindfulness practice: Mixed methods study. ’, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22:3, p. e16106.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sung, J.,, Woo, J.-M.,, Kim, W.,, Lim, S.-K., and Chung, E.-J.. ( 2012;), ‘ The effect of cognitive behavior therapy-based “forest therapy” program on blood pressure, salivary cortisol level, and quality of life in elderly hypertensive patients. ’, Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, 34:1, pp. 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Thomas, S.. ( 2013), Technobiophilia: Nature and Cyberspace, New York:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Thwaites, H.. ( 2005;), ‘ The immersant experience of Osmose and Ephémere. ’, in Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Augmented Tele-Existence, New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 148–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tidball, K. G.. ( 2012;), ‘ Urgent biophilia: Human-nature interactions and biological attractions in disaster resilience. ’, Ecology and Society, 17:2, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04596-170205.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Tidball, K. G.. ( 2014;), ‘ Seeing the forest for the trees: Hybridity and social-ecological symbols, rituals and resilience in postdisaster contexts. ’, Ecology and Society, 19:4, https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06903-190425.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Trewin, D., and Madden, R.. ( 2005), The Health and Welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, Canberra:: Australian Bureau of Statistics;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Ulrich, R. S.. ( 1984;), ‘ View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. ’, Science, 224:4647, pp. 420–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ulrich, R. S.. ( 1997;), ‘ A theory of supportive design for healthcare facilities. ’, Journal of Healthcare Design: Proceedings from the Symposium on Healthcare Design. Symposium on Healthcare Design, 9, pp. 3–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Valmaggia, L. R.,, Latif, L.,, Kempton, M. J.,, Rus-Calafell, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Virtual reality in the psychological treatment for mental health problems: A systematic review of recent evidence. ’, Psychiatry Research, 236, pp. 189–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Vinje, H. F.,, Langeland, E., and Bull, T.. ( 2016;), ‘ Aaron Antonovsky’s development of salutogenesis, 1979 to 1994. ’, in M. B. Mittelmark,, S. Sagy,, M. Eriksson,, G. F. Bauer,, J. M. Pelikan,, B. Lindström, and G. A. Espnes. (eds), The Handbook of Salutogenesis, Cham:: Springer;, pp. 25–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Virtual Forest Bathing ( n.d.;), ‘ Forest bathing international. ’, http://www.forestbathinginternational.org/virtual-forest-bathing.html. Accessed 13 July 2020.
  56. White, M. P.,, Yeo, N.,, Vassiljev, P.,, Lundstedt, R.,, Wallergård, M.,, Albin, M., and Lõhmus, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ A prescription for nature: The potential of using virtual nature in therapeutics. ’, Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 14, pp. 3001–13, https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s179038. Accessed 1 June 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wilson, E. O.. ( 1984), Biophilia, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Williams, Jessica Laraine,, Langley, Susannah, and Borda, Ann. ( 2021;), ‘ Virtual nature, inner forest: Prospects for immersive virtual nature art and well-being. ’, Virtual Creativity, 11:1, pp. 125–46, https://doi.org/10.1386/vcr_00046_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00046_1
Loading
Virtual nature, inner forest: Prospects for immersive virtual nature art and well-being
Virtual Creativity 11, 125 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/vcr_00046_1
/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00046_1
/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00046_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): biophilia; biophilic design; extended reality; virtual forest; virtual nature; visual art; VR art; wellbeing

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error