A methodology for 3D digital sketching practice in undergraduate architectural education

References

1. Agirbas, Asli (2019), ‘The evaluation of the relationship between the use of multi-software and the students’ attitude towards computers and technology in undergraduate architectural design studio education’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 24:1, pp. 122–37.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Agirbas, Asli (2020), ‘Optimization test of a rule-based swarm intelligence simulation for the conceptual design process’, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 34:4, pp. 477–91, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060420000323.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Agirbas, Asli (2021), ‘An experimental framework for designing a parametric design course’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:3, pp. 102–18.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Agirbas, Asli (2022), ‘A teaching methodology on the combination of architectural tradition and parametric design: A case study with birdhouses’, International Journal of Islamic Architecture, 11:1, pp. 149–68, https://doi.org/10.1386/ijia_00068_1.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aish, Robert and Hanna, Sean (2017), ‘Comparative evaluation of parametric design systems for teaching design computation’, Design Studies, 52, pp. 144–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.05.002.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Akbay, Saadet (2022), ‘Constructive alignment of basic design education: Students’ approaches to learning and perceived learning demands in online distance education’, Online Journal of Art and Design, 10:4, pp. 238–49.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Akbulut, Dilek (2010), ‘The effects of different student backgrounds in basic design education’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2:2, pp. 5331–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.868.
   [Google Scholar]
8. de Araujo Lima, Fernando Tadeu (2018), ‘Architectural teaching and design computing: A didactic experience in a Brazilian architecture course’, Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 12, pp. 51–58, https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2018.01.005.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Asadpour, Ali (2021), ‘Student challenges in online architectural design courses in Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic’, E-Learning and Digital Media, 18:6, pp. 511–29, https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022923.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bueno, Ernesto and Turkienicz, Benamy (2014), ‘Supporting tools for early stages of architectural design’, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 12:4, pp. 495–512, https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.12.4.495.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Celani, Gabriela and Vaz, Carlos Eduardo Verzola (2012), ‘CAD scripting and visual programming languages for implementing computational design concepts: A comparison from a pedagogical point of view’, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 10:1, pp. 121–37, https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.10.1.121.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ceylan, Salih, Şahin, Pınar, Seçmen, Serengül, Somer, Melek Elif and Süher, Kemal H. (2021), ‘An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID19 outbreak’, Archnet-IJAR, 15:1, pp. 203–18, https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cheng, Chu-Yu and Ou, Yang-Kun (2017), ‘An investigation of basic design capacity performance in different background students’, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13:5, pp. 1177–87, https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00666a.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Do, Ellen Yi-Luen (2002), ‘Drawing marks, acts, and reacts: Toward a computational sketching interface for architectural design’, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 16:3, pp. 149–71, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060402163037.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Do, Ellen Yi-Luen, Gross, Mark D., Neiman, Bennett and Zimring, Craig (2001), ‘Intentions in and relations among design drawings’, Design Studies, 21:5, pp. 483–503, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00020-X.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dzurilla, Dalibor and Achten, Henri (2021), ‘What is architectural digital sketch? A systematic inventory’, in Proceedings of the eCAADe Conference, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, 8–10 September, pp. 403–14, https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2021.1.403.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Globa, Anastasia, Donn, Michael and Moloney, Jules (2015), ‘Abstraction versus case based: A comparative study of two approaches to support parametric design’, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 13:3&4, pp. 313–33, https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.13.3-4.313.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Goldschmidt, Gabriela (1991), ‘The dialectics of sketching’, Creativity Research Journal, 4:2, pp. 123–43, https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Guler, Kutay and Atalayer, Faruk (2016), ‘Assessing visual skill development in basic design education’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 15:1, pp. 71–88, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.15.1.71_1.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gündüz, Gamze, Oral, Hülya and Yazar, Tuğrul (2018), ‘Integration of design geometry with “computational making” in basic design studio: A case study of Lanterns Project’, in Proceedings of eCAADe Conference, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, 19–21 September, pp. 439–48, https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2018.2.439.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Haapasalo, Harri (1997), ‘The role of CAD in creative architectural sketching’, in Proceedings of 15th eCAADe Conference, Vienna, 17–20 September, https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.1997.x.o2b.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Headley, Dustin (2013), ‘Integration of parametric thinking within undergraduate design studios’, in M. A. Schnabel (ed.), Cutting Edge: 47th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association, Melbourne: The Architectural Science Association, pp. 167–76.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hsieh, Ying-Yi, Chen, Chun-Ching and Chen, Wen-Yin (2022), ‘Form development from 2D to 3D: The basic design courses for higher education’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 41:1, pp. 96–107, https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12377.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Huang, Ronghuai, Tlili, Ahmed, Chang, Ting-Wen, Zhang, Xiangling, Nascimbeni, Fabio and Burgos, Daniel (2020), ‘Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: Application of open educational practices and resources’, Smart Learning Environments, 7:1, p. 19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00125-8.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ibrahim, Anwar F., Attia, Ahmed S., Bataineh, Asma M. and Ali, Hikmat H. (2021), ‘Evaluation of the online teaching of architectural design and basic design courses case study: College of Architecture at JUST, Jordan’, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12:2, pp. 2345–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.006.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kim, Han-Jong, Jeong, Yunwoo, Kim, Ju-Whan and Nam, Tek-Jin (2018), ‘A prototyping tool for kinetic mechanism design and fabrication: Developing and deploying M.Sketch for science, technology, engineering, the arts, and mathematics education’, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10:12, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018804104.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lawson, Bryan (2005), ‘Oracles, draughtsmen, and agents: The nature of knowledge and creativity in design and the role of IT’, Automation in Construction, 14:3, pp. 383–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.005.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lim, Chor-Kheng (2010), ‘A preliminary study for a teaching framework that incorporates CAD/CAM media into the basic design studio’, in Proceedings of eCAADe Conference, ETH Zurich, 15–18 September, pp. 41–50, https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2010.041.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Martosenjoyo, Triyatni (2021), ‘Architecture education during the COVID-19 pandemic’, Education Quarterly Reviews, 4:4, pp. 472–83, https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.04.408.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Megahed, Naglaa and Hassan, Asmaa (2022), ‘A blended learning strategy: Reimagining the post-COVID-19 architectural education’, Archnet-IJAR, 16:1, pp. 184–202, https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2021-0081.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Milovanović, Aleksandra, Miloš, Kostić, Ana, Zorić, Aleksandra, Đorđević, Mladen, Pešić, Jovana, Bugarski, Dejan, Todorović, Neda, Sokolović and Andrej, Josifovski (2020), ‘Transferring COVID-19 challenges into learning potentials: Online workshops in architectural education’, Sustainability, 12:17, p. 7024, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177024.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ranscombe, Charlie and Bissett-Johnson, Katherine (2017), ‘Digital sketch modelling: Integrating digital sketching as a transition between sketching and CAD in industrial design education’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 22:1, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Schnabel, Marc Aurel (2013), ‘Learning parametric designing’, in Industrial Engineering: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 197–210.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Schön, Donald A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Uysal, V. Şafak and Topaloğlu, Fulden (2017), ‘Bridging the gap: A manual primer into design computing in the context of basic design education’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36:1, pp. 21–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12048.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Varma, Anurag and Jafri, Mohammad Shoeb (2021), ‘COVID-19 responsive teaching of undergraduate architecture programs in India: Learnings for post-pandemic education’, Archnet-IJAR, 15:1, pp. 189–202, https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0234.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Yavuz, Arzu Ozen and Yildirim, Tayfun (2012), ‘Utilization of digital-algorithmic design tools in architectural basic design education’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, pp. 307–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.164.
    [Google Scholar]