The potential of online object-based learning activities to support the teaching of intersectional environmentalism in art and design higher education

References

1. Alix, C., Dobson, E. and Wilsmore, R. (2010), ‘Collaborative art practices in HE: Mapping and developing pedagogical models’, https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/collaborative-practice-report-final-july2011_1568036669.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2023.
2. Barton, G. and Willcocks, J. (2017), ‘Object-based self-enquiry: A multi- and trans- disciplinary pedagogy for transformational learning’, Spark: UAL Creative Teaching and Learning Journal, 2:3, pp. 229–45, https://sparkjournal.arts.ac.uk/index.php/spark/article/view/75. Accessed 25 July 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawaki-Richter, O. and Kerres, M. (2020), ‘Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36:4, pp. 126–50.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blair, B. (2012), ‘Elastic minds? Is the interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary curriculum equipping our students for the future: A case study’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 10:1, pp. 33–50, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.10.1.33_1.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bond, M. and Bedenlier, S. (2019), Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework’, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019:1, pp. 1–14, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335724996_Facilitating_Student_Engagement_Through_Educational_Technology_Towards_a_Conceptual_Framework. Accessed 2 February 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bower, M. and Torrington, J. (2020), ‘Typology of free web-based learning technologies’, https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2020/4/freewebbasedlearntech2020.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2022.
7. Boys, J. (2010), ‘Creative differences: Deconstructing the conceptual learning spaces of higher education’, in B. Cook, R. Reynolds and C. Speight (eds), Museums and Design Education: Looking to Learn, Learning to See, London: Routledge, pp. 43–60.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brockway, L. H. ([1979] 2002), Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bunting, L. and Hill, V. (2021), ‘Rational reflections: How do we nurture belonging in creative Higher Education?’, Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 21:Glad-HE Special Edition, pp. 139–65.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Campbell, S. (2019), ‘Ludic practice: The case for play in university museums’, Spark: UAL Creative Teaching and Learning Journal, 4:1, pp. 59–70.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Case, K. (2016), Intersectional Pedagogy: Complicating Identity and Social Justice, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chatterjee, H. (2007), ‘Staying essential: Articulating the value of object-based learning in UMAC Journal’, Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Committee of ICOM for University Museums and Collections, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chatterjee, H., Duhs, R. and Hannan, L. (2013), ‘Object-based learning: A powerful pedagogy for higher education’, in A. Boddington, J. Boys and C. Speight (eds), Museums and Higher Education Working Together: Challenges and Opportunities, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 159–68.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chatterjee, H. and Hannan, L. (eds) (2015), Engaging the Senses: Object-based Learning in Higher Education, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chavis, B. and Lee, C. (1987), ‘Toxic wastes and race in the United States’, Commission for Racial Justice and United Church of Christ, https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/unitedchurchofchrist/legacy_url/13567/toxwrace87.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Collins, P. H. (2002), Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cook, B. (2010), ‘The design student experience in the museum’, in B. Cook, R. Reynolds and C. Speight (eds), Museums and Design Education: Looking to Learn, Learning to See, London: Routledge, pp. 91–104.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Costanza-Chock, S. (2018), ‘Design justice: Towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice’, in C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd and E. Bohemia (eds), Design as a Catalyst for Change - DRS International Conference 2018, 25–28 June, Limerick, Ireland, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.679.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Crenshaw, K. (1989), ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989:1, pp. 57–80.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Deb Roy, R. (2018), ‘Decolonise science: Time to end another imperial era’, The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/decolonise-science-time-to-end-another-imperial-era-89189. Accessed 5 January 2022.
22. Drayton, R. (2000), Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain and the ‘Improvement’ of the World, London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ducre, K. A. (2018), ‘The Black feminist spatial imagination and an intersectional environmental justice’, Environmental Sociology, 4:1, pp. 22–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1426089.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Duhs, R. (2010), ‘Learning from university museums and collections in higher education’, University Museums and Collections Journal, 3, pp. 184–86, https://doi.org/10.18452/8698.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ekiger, M. and Varpio, L. (2020), ‘Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131’, Medical Teacher, 42:8, pp. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Engeström, Y. (1999), ‘Activity theory and individual and social transformation’, in Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen and R. L. Punamäki (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–38.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fowkes Tobin, B. (1996), ‘Imperial designs: Botanical illustration and the British Botanic Empire’, Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture, 25:1, pp. 265–92.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gebrial, D. (2018), ‘Rhodes must fall: Oxford and movements for change’, in G. K. Bhambra, D. Gebrial and K. Nisancioğlu (eds), Decolonising the University, London: Pluto Press, pp. 19–36.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kador, T., Hannan, L., Nyhan, J., Terras, M., Chatterjee, H. J. and Carnall, M. (2018), ‘Object-based learning and research-based education: Case studies from UCL curricula’, in J. P. Davies and N. Pachler (eds), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL, London: UCL IoE Press, pp. 157–76.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kaijser, A. and Kronsell, A. (2014), ‘Climate change through the lens of intersectionality’, Environmental Politics, 23:3, pp. 417–33, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.835203.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kolb, D. A. (1984), Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kapoor, A., Hood, S. and Youssef, N. (2022), ‘Confronting injustice: Racism and the environmental emergency’, Greenpeace UK and Runnymede Trust, https://assets.website-files.com/61488f992b58e687f1108c7c/62d83cf937af0a0d208d4501_FinalDesign5pm_compressed.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kelly, R. (2017), ‘Ikebana: A collaborative design pedagogy’, The Design Journal, 20:1, pp. S1093–105, https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353053.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kingsley, A. (2021), My Secret Ed Tech Diary: Looking at Educational Technology through a Wider Lens, Woodbridge: John Catt Educational Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kolb, A. and Kolb, D. A. (2017), The Experiential Educator: Principles and Practices of Experiential Learning, Kaunakakai: EBLS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lange, S. and Willcocks, J. (2021), ‘Using cross-disciplinary object-based learning to create collaborative learning environments’, in K. Enomoto, R. Warner and C. Nygaard (eds), Teaching and Learning Innovations in Higher Education, Faringdon: Libri Publishing, pp. 451–74.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Last, A. (2018), ‘Internationalism and Interdisciplinarity: Sharing across boundaries’, in G. K. Bhambra, D. Gebrial and K. Nisancioğlu (eds), Decolonising the University, London: Pluto Press, pp. 208–30.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lykke, N. (2010), Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Macmillan Voskoboynik, D. (2018), ‘To fix the climate crisis, we must face up to our imperial past’, Open Democracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/to-fix-climate-crisis-we-must-acknowledge-our-imperial-past/. Accessed 26 January 2022.
40. Manzini, E. (2015), Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation, London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Morales, M. M. (2017), ‘Creating the transdisciplinary individual: Guiding principles rooted in studio pedagogy’, Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 6:1, pp. 28–42.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Müller Wille, S. (2005), ‘Walnuts in Hudson Bay, Coral Reefs in Gotland: The colonialism of Linnaean Botany’, in L. Schiebinger and C. Swan (eds), Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 34–48.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mumbi Maina-Okori, N., Koushik, J. R. and Wilson, A. (2018), ‘Reimagining intersectionality in environmental and sustainability education: A critical literature review’, The Journal of Environmental Education, 49:4, pp. 286–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1364215.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Orr, S. and Shreeve, A. (2018), Art and Design Pedagogy in Higher Education: Knowledge, Values and Ambiguity in the Creative Curriculum, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Paris, S. G. (2002), Perspectives on Object-Centred Learning in Museums, Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Powell, J., Wood, M. and Karlin, L. (2020), Lessons Learned: Teaching and Learning During COVID 19, Shift Insight, internal report, London: University of the Arts London.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rose, G. (2012), Visual Methodolgies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, 3rd ed., London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sankey, M. (2020), ‘Putting the pedagogic horse in front of the technology cart’, Journal of Distance Education in China, 5, pp. 46–53, https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2020.05.006.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Saunders, G. (1995), Picturing Plants: An Analytical History of Botanical Illustrations, London: Zwemmer.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Schiebinger, L. and Swan, C. (2007), Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce and Politics in the Early Modern World, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Shön, D. (2017), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Shreeve, A., Sims, E. and Trowler, P. (2010), ‘A kind of exchange: Learning from art and design teaching’, Higher Education Research and Development, 29:2, pp. 125–38.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Steele, V. (1998), ‘A museum of fashion is more than a clothes bag’, Fashion Theory, 2:4, pp. 327–36.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Stember, M. (1991), ‘Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise’, The Social Science Journal, 28:1, pp. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Thomas, L. (2020), ‘Social justice cannot wait’, Instagram, 28 May, https://www.instagram.com/p/CAvaxdRJRxu/. Accessed 26 July 2022.
56. Willcocks, J. (2015), ‘The power of concrete experience: Museum collections, touch and meaning-making in art and design pedagogy’, in H. Chatterjee and L. Hannan (eds), Engaging the Senses: Object-Based Learning in Higher Education, Farnham: Routledge, pp. 43–56.
    [Google Scholar]