Peace education as a controversial issue: The ‘Peace Case’ | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925

Abstract

This qualitative case study examines the Peace Case in its historical context and scrutinizes the complexities. Ms Butera, who became known as the ‘peace teacher’, had to deal with in the aftermath of her remark ‘I honk for peace’ in her classroom. Drawing from the fields of peace education and educational leadership and policy studies, the study aims to shed light to the dominant dynamics in the case, especially those that might be discouraging teachers to integrate the potentially controversial themes related to war and peace into their curricula. To this end, it first discusses peace education as a controversial issue and illustrates several facets of peace education that make it controversial. Following this, an analysis of a post-Garcetti case, which is known as the ‘Peace Case’, is presented. As this analysis sheds light on several implications regarding peace education as a controversial issue and teachers’ freedom of speech in the classroom, these implications are presented for teacher educators in the final section. While scrutinizing the challenging nature of present public schooling through Ms Butera’s struggles, the study uncovers the possibilities of peace education practices even in an oppressive system of schooling through robust teacher education programmes equipping teachers with powerful skills and capabilities required for transformative educators.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00046_1
2021-03-01
2024-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. (2002), ‘Searching Iraq’, Time for Kids, World Report ed., http://www.lukas-krumnacker.de/Englisch/American-history/2000-/Searching-Iraq.htm. Accessed 12 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Associated Press (2006), ‘High Court curbs whistleblower lawsuits’, 30 May, http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=16949. Accessed 20 June 2020.
  3. Bajaj, M. (2008), ‘Critical peace education’, in Bajaj, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Peace Education, New York: Colombia Teacher’s College, pp. 13546.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartlett, L. (2005), ‘Dialogue, knowledge, and teacher–student relations: Freirean pedagogy in theory and practice’, Comparative Education Review, 49:3, pp. 34464.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickmore, K. (2011), ‘Education for “peace” in urban Canadian schools: Gender, culture, conflict’, in Trifonas, P. Pericles and Wright, B. (eds), Critical Issues in Peace and Education, New York: Routledge, pp. 88103.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Binder, A. J. (2002), Contentious Curricula: Afrocentrism and Creationism in American Public Schools, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boulding, E. (1988), Building a Global Civic Culture: Education for an Interdependent World, New York and London: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burns, R. J. and Aspeslaugh, R. (1996), Three Decades of Peace Education Around the World, New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carr, P. R. and Porrfilio, B. J. (2012), Educating for Peace in a Time of Permanent War: Are Schools Part of the Solution or the Problem?, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Charmaz, K. (2006), Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Danesh, H. B. (2007), ‘Education for peace: The pedagogy of civilization’, in Beckerman, Z. and McGlynn, C. (eds), Addressing Ethnic Conflict Through Peace Education: International Perspectives, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 13759.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Darder, A. (2012), ‘Preface: In search of peace in a culture of war’, in Carr, P. R. and Porfilio, B. J. (eds), Educating for Peace in a Time of Permanent War: Are Schools Part of the Solution or the Problem?, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2011), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans, R. W. (2004), The Social Studies Wars: What Should We Teach the Children?, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Flinders, D. J. (2005), ‘The failings of NCLB’, Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 7:1&2, pp. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Flinders, D. J. (2006), ‘We can and should teach the war in Iraq’, Education Digest, 71:5, pp. 812.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Freire, P. (1970), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gordon, H. and Grob, L. (1987), Education for Peace: Testimonies from World Religions, Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, New York: International Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gürsel-Bilgin, G. (2016), ‘Dialogue for peace education: The case of an alternative school’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gürsel-Bilgin, G. (2017), ‘Bells of war in the peace class: A critical look’, in Tochon, F. V. and Harrison, K. M. (eds), Policy for Peace: Language Education Unlimited (Language Education Policy), Blue Mounds, WI: Deep University Press, pp. 181203.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gürsel-Bilgin, G. (2020), ‘Dialogue in peace education theory and practice’, Educational Theory and Practice, 42:1, pp. 2746.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Haavelsrud, M. (1981), Approaching Disarmament Education, Guilfold: Westbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Haavelsrud, M. (1996), Education in Development, Tromso: Arena.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Haavelsrud, M. (2008), Conceptual Perspectives in Peace Education, Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, https://www.tc.columbia.edu/epe/epe-entries/Haavelsrud_ch7_22feb08.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hahn, C. L. (1991), ‘Controversial issues in social studies’, in Shaver, J. P. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Social Studies Teaching and Learning, New York: Macmillan, pp. 47082.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Harris, I. (2004), ‘Peace education theory’, Journal of Peace Education, 1:1, pp. 520.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Harris, I. M. and Morrison, M. L. (2003), Peace Education, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Haydon, G. (2007), ‘Educational aims and the question of priorities’, in Stoltman, J. P., Lidstone, J. and DeChano, L. M. (eds), International Perspectives on Natural Disasters: Occurrence, Mitigation, and Consequence, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 35967.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hertzberg, H. W. (1981), Social Studies Reform, 1880–1980, Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hess, D. (2009), Controversy in the Classroom: The Democratic Power of Discussion, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoepfl, M. (1997), ‘Closure of technology teacher education programs: Factors influencing discontinuance decisions’, Ph.D. thesis, Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hunter, J. D. (1991), Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hutchinson, F. and Herborn, P. (2012), ‘Landscapes for peace: A case study of active learning about urban environments and the future’, Futures, 44:1, pp. 2435.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnston, H. (1995), ‘A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schema’, in Johnston, H. and Klandermans, B. (eds), Social Movements and Culture, London: Routledge, pp. 21746.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Johnston, H. (2002), ‘Verification and proof in frame and discourse analysis’, in Klandermans, B. and Staggenborg, S. (eds), Methods of Social Movement Research, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 6291.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaufmann, K. M. (2002), ‘Culture wars, secular realignment, and the gender gap in party identification’, Political Behavior, 24:3, pp. 283307.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kliebard, H. M. (2004), The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Maalouf, J. (2007), If We See What They See: Peace According to…, Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McCarthy, M. and Eckes, S. (2008), ‘Silence in the hallways: The impact of Garcetti v. Ceballos on public school educators’, Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 17:2, pp. 20935.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Moberg, D. O. (2008), ‘21st century culture wars: Sociological, historical, and biblical perspectives’, keynote address, 27th Annual Conference, Association of Nazarene Sociologists and Researchers, ANSR XXVII, Kansas City, July.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nario-Galace, J. and Navarro-Castro, L. (2011), Peace Education: A Pathway to a Culture of Peace, Quezon City: Center for Peace Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Nash, G. B., Crabtree, C. and Dunn, R. E. (1997), History on Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Nemunaitis, J. (2007), ‘Mayer v. Monroe: The Seventh Circuit sheds freedom of speech at the classroom door’, Seventh Circuit Review, 2:2, p. 762.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Noddings, N. (2012), Peace Education: How We Come to Love and Hate War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ochoa-Becker, A. S. (2007), Democratic Education for Social Studies: An Issues-Centered Curriculum, Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Page, J. S. (2008), ‘The United Nations and peace education’, in M., Bajaj (ed.), Encyclopedia of Peace Education, Charlotte, NC: Information Age, pp. 7583.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Parker, W. C. (2003), Teaching Democracy: Unity and Diversity in Public Life, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005), ‘Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research’, The Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52:2, pp. 13745.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Reardon, B. (1988), Comprehensive Peace Education: Educating for Global Responsibility, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Reardon, B. (2000), ‘Peace education: A review and projection’, in Moon, B., Brown, S. and Peretz, M. B. (eds), Routledge International Companion to Education, New York: Routledge, pp. 397425.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ross, W. (2006), ‘The struggle for the social studies curriculum’, in Ross, W. (ed.), The Social Studies Curriculum: Purposes, Problems, and Possibilities, 3rd rev. ed., Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 1736.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Rule, P. (2011), ‘Bakhtin and Freire: Dialogue, dialectic and boundary learning’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43:9, pp. 92442.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Salomon, G. (2002), ‘The nature of peace education: Not all programs are created equal’, in Salomon, G. and Nevo, B. (eds), Peace Education: The Concept, Principles and Practices Around the World, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 313.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Salomon, G. and Cairns, E. (2010), Handbook on Peace Education, New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Salomon, G. and Nevo, B. (2002), Peace Education: The Concept, Principles, and Practices Around the World, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Seidman, I. (2006), Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, 3rd ed., New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Shor, I. and Freire, P. (1987), A Pedagogy for Liberation: Dialogues on Transforming Education, London: Bergin & Garvey.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Smith, D. C. and Carson, T. R. (1998), Educating for a Peaceful Future, Toronto: Kagan & Woo.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Thornton, S. J. (2005), Teaching Social Studies that Matter: Curriculum for Active Learning, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Trifonas, P. P. and Wright, B. (2011), Critical Issues in Peace and Education, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Tygesson, N. K. (2013), ‘Cracking open the classroom door: Developing a First Amendment standard for curricular speech’, Northwestern University Law Review, 107:4, pp. 191751.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Walsh, M. (2007), ‘Teacher’s free speech case denied’, Education Week: Teacher, 5 October, http://www.edweek.org/tm/news/profession/2007/10/05/ew_freespeech_web.h19.html. Accessed 12 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Gürsel-Bilgin, Gülistan (2021), ‘Peace education as a controversial issue: The “Peace Case”’, Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 16:1, pp. 4967, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00046_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00046_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error