Theorizing gender in homestay settings: Mobilities and/as power relations | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Hospitality & Society
  4. Volume 13, Issue 3
  5. Article
Understanding Gender and Sexual Politics in Hospitality as Hospo-Gender
  • ISSN: 2042-7913
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7921

Abstract

A contribution to critical work in hospitality, this article theorizes gendered power relations in various homestay settings. As such, it is an endorsement of – and response to – Shelagh Mooney’s call for critical problematization of ‘gender’, not least as a lens to better understanding the hospitality experiences of – and research approaches to – marginalized people, including women but also LGBTIQA+-identifying people. Discussed are the following ideas: intersectional identities and positionalities as these relate to gendered power relations; the role of mobilities in host/guest conflicts and resolutions; and the contested axiologies, epistemologies and ontologies that may undergird host–guest conflicts. We draw on our empirical research among homestay guests and hosts, including qualitative interviews with au pair, Workaway and WWOOFing hosts and guests and ethnographic research undertaken among Spanish-language learners in Guatemala and Nicaragua. Across all contexts, we focus on women’s and LGBTIQA+ people’s experiences in homestays – as part of wider mobilities – as prisms through which to understand the ways in which gendered identity work is undertaken and gender roles may be performed, negotiated, constructed and – above all – contested in hospitality settings more broadly as well as the associated mobilities, affordances and constraints. As such, this article contributes to the critical hospitality literature by gender in this context, understanding it as something one does/performs rather than is.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Edinburgh Napier University’s
© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/hosp_00070_1
2023-12-11
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2006), Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, B. (2007), ‘A very private business: Exploring the demand for migrant domestic workers’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14:3, pp. 247–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Appleby, R. (2019), Sexing the Animal in a Posthuman World: A Critical Feminist Approach, New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986), ‘The forms of capital’, in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boylorn, R. M. (2016), ‘On being at home with myself: Blackgirl autoethnography as research praxis’, International Review of Qualitative Research, 9:1, pp. 44–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Butler, J. (1993), Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chambers, D. and Rakic, T. (2018), ‘Critical considerations on gender and tourism: An introduction’, Tourism, Culture and Communication, 18:1, https://doi.org/10.3727/109830418X15180180585112.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cobb, M. (2012), Single: Arguments for the Uncoupled, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Connell, R. (2005), Masculinities, 2nd ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalgas, K. (2014), ‘Becoming independent through au pair migration: Self-making and social re-positioning among young Filipinas in Denmark’, Identities, 22:3, pp. 333–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dashper, K. and Finkel, R. (2021), ‘“Doing gender” in critical event studies: A dual agenda for research’, International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 12:1, pp. 70–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Derrida, J. (1999), Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Derrida, J. and Dufourmantelle, A. (2000), Of Hospitality (trans. R.Bowlby), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Edelman, B., Luca, M. and Svirsky, D. (2017), ‘Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9:2, https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/app.20160213. Accessed 18 July 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Elder, K. E. (2016), ‘From genderfuck to nonbinary: Negotiating gender in performance’, master’s thesis, College Station, TX: Texas A & M University, https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/157097. Accessed 21 July 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Figueroa-Domecq, C., Pritchard, A., Segovia-Pérez, M., Morgan, N. and Villacé-Molinero, T. (2015), ‘Tourism gender research: A critical accounting’, Annals of Tourism Research, 52, pp. 87–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Germann Molz, J. (2011), ‘CouchSurfing and network hospitality: “It’s not just about the furniture”’, Hospitality and Society, 1:3, pp. 215–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Glenza, J., Pengelly, M. and Levin, S. (2022), ‘US Supreme Court overturns abortion rights, upending Roe v Wade’, The Guardian, 24 June, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/24/roe-v-wade-overturned-abortion-summary-supreme-court. Accessed 17 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Graff, A., Kapur, R. and Walters, S. D. (2019), ‘Introduction: Gender and the rise of the global right’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44:3, pp. 541–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Heller, A. (1995), ‘Where are we at home?’, Thesis Eleven, 41:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369504100102.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hess, S. and Puckhaber, A. (2004), ‘“Big sisters” are better domestic servants?! Comments on the booming au pair business’, Feminist Review, 77:1, pp. 65–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Holman Jones, S. and Harris, A. M. (2019), Queering Autoethnography, New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hopper, B. (2019), Hard to Love: Essays and Confessions, New York: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lashley, C. (2000), ‘Towards a theoretical understanding’, in C. Lashley and A. Morrison (eds), In Search of Hospitality: Theoretical Perspectives and Debates, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lashley, C. and Lynch, P. (2013), ‘Control and hospitality’, Hospitality and Society, 3:1, pp. 3–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Leung, G. and Stone, M. (2009), ‘Otherwise than hospitality: A disputation on the relation of ethics to law and politics’, Law Critique, 20:2, pp. 193–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lucena, R., Vorobjovas-Pinta, O. and Cai, W. (2021), ‘Introduction to gender and sexuality in tourism and hospitality’, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 21:4, pp. 426–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lynch, P. (2005), ‘The commercial home enterprise and host: A United Kingdom perspective’, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 24:4, pp. 533–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Madigan, R., Munro, M. and Smith, S. J. (1990), ‘Gender and the meaning of the home’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 14:4, pp. 625–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mallett, S. (2004), ‘Understanding home: A critical review of the literature’, Sociological Review, 52:1, pp. 62–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Manning, E. (2013), Always More Than One: Individuation’s Dance, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Maricourt, C. de and Burrell, S. R. (2022), ‘#MeToo or #MenToo? Expressions of backlash and masculinity politics in the #MeToo era’, Journal of Men’s Studies, 30:1, pp. 49–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. McRuer, R. (2006), Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Messerschmidt, J. W. and Messner, M. A. (2018), ‘Hegemonic, nonhegemonic, and “new” masculinities’, in J. W. Messerschmidt, P. Y. Martin, M. A. Messner and R. Connell (eds), Gender Reckonings: New Social Theory and Research, New York: New York University Press, pp. 35–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Mittelhammer, B., Sepehri Far, T. and Tahmasebi, S. (2023), ‘Rethinking the EU’s approach to women’s rights in Iran’, working paper, Carnegie Europe, 25 April, https://carnegieeurope.eu/2023/04/25/rethinking-eu-s-approach-to-women-s-rights-in-iran-pub-89559. Accessed 17 October 2023.
  37. Mooney, S. K. (2020), ‘Gender research in hospitality and tourism management: Time to change the guard’, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32:5, pp. 1861–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Morgan, N. and Pritchard, A. (2019), ‘Gender matters in hospitality’, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Special Issue: ‘Luminaries’, 76, pp. 38–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Moysidou, G. (2020a), ‘Constructing the moral framework of hospitality in non-commercial homestays’, Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh: Edinburgh Napier University.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Moysidou, G. (2020b), ‘“Which side are you on?” Between two cultures’, in P. Stanley (ed.), Critical Autoethnography and Intercultural Learning, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 174–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ong, F., Vorobjovas-Pinta, O. and Lewis, C. (2022), ‘LGBTIQ+ identities in tourism and leisure research: A systematic qualitative literature review’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30:7, pp. 1476–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pennycook, A. (2001), Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction, Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Pennycook, A. (2021), Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Re-Introduction, 2nd ed., London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Peters, J. (2019), A Feminist Post-Transsexual Autoethnography: Challenging Normative Gender Coercion, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Przyblo, E. (2019), Asexual Erotics: Intimate Readings of Compulsory Sexuality, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Roseneil, S., Crowhurst, I., Hellesund, T., Santos, A. C. and Stoilova, M. (2020), The Tenacity of the Couple-Norm: Intimate Citizenship Regimes in a Changing Europe, London: UCL Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Segovia-Pérez, M., Figueroa-Domecq, C., Fuentes-Moraleda, L. and Muñoz-Mazón, A. (2019), ‘Incorporating a gender approach in the hospitality industry: Female executives’ perceptions’, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, pp. 184–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sheller, M. (2018), Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes, London and New York: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Stanley, P. (2017), A Critical Auto/Ethnography of Learning Spanish: Intercultural Competence on the ‘Gringo Trail?’, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Stanley, P. (2019), ‘Autoethnography and ethnography in English language teaching’, in X. Gao (ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, Cham: Springer, pp. 1071–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Stanley, P. (2020), Critical Autoethnography and Intercultural Learning: Emerging Voices, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Stanley, P. (2021), ‘Problematizing “activism”: Medical volunteer tourism in Central America, local resistance, and academic activism’, International Review of Qualitative Research, 14:3, pp. 412–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Stanley, P. (2022), An Autoethnography of Fitting In: On Spinsterhood, Fatness, and Backpacker Tourism, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Urry, J. (2007), Mobilities, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Wengel, Y., McIntosh, A. and Cockburn-Wootten, C. (2018), ‘Tourism and  “dirt”: A case study of WWOOF farms in New Zealand’, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 35, pp. 46–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wilson, E. and Chambers, D. (2023), ‘Introduction to a research agenda for gender and tourism’, in E. Wilson and D. Chambers (eds), A Research Agenda for Gender and Tourism, Cheltenham and Northampton: Elgar, pp. 1–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Workaway (n.d.), ‘Travel safely with Workaway: Emergency help’, https://www.workaway.info/en/info/safety/emergencyhelp. Accessed 22 June 2023.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/hosp_00070_1
Loading
Theorizing gender in homestay settings: Mobilities and/as power relations
Hospitality & Society 13, 241 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/hosp_00070_1
/content/journals/10.1386/hosp_00070_1
/content/journals/10.1386/hosp_00070_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): au pairing; critical hospitality; gendered power relations; identity; LGBTQIA+; mobilities capital; volunteer tourism; WWOOF

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error