Alimenta: A design-led systemic action against homelessness-related food poverty | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Food Design
  4. Volume 8, Issue 2
  5. Article
Co-Creating Sustainable Food Systems
  • ISSN: 2056-6522
  • E-ISSN: 2056-6530
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This article presents a project carried out as a design-led systemic action aimed at tackling food poverty among people experiencing homelessness in Turin, Italy. Building on their experience in this project, the authors discuss the complex and multidimensional nature of homelessness-related food poverty within a mature socio-economic context and argue how design enabled systemic actions to understand and tackle this phenomenon. First, the article describes the birth and development of the ongoing project. It outlines the background scenario within which Alimenta started eight years ago, by presenting the issues and the spotty response to food poverty performed by the civil society and the city administration at that time. Then, it outlines how Alimenta was designed to address the health and social needs related to the scarcity and the qualitative deficiencies of food resources for the people hosted in the city’s public shelters. It highlights the relevance of the multi-stakeholder perspective and of the co-design and co-production approach – promoted by the project team – in allowing the city actors to better deal with food poverty and to counter the several criticalities at stake. Second, the authors describe how by enabling multi-level relationships between local actors, and by coordinating and facilitating actions pursuing different objectives, Alimenta has contributed to a systemic response to the and aspects of food poverty. The article thus presents the achievements of the project regarding the well-being of the beneficiaries and the new local food system created. Finally, a focus is given to the knowledge that the project has generated in relation not only to the phenomenon of food poverty and to the possible ways of facing it but also to the possible role of designers in this kind of contexts. Thus, the authors discuss the limits of Alimenta and the potential scalability of the designed interventions from a ‘design for policy’ perspective.

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Intellect Ltd.
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows users to copy, distribute and transmit the article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00063_1
2023-07-17
2024-05-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijfd/8/2/ijfd.8.2.227_Campagnaro.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00063_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bason, C. (ed.) (2014), Design for Policy, New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergamaschi, M. and Musarò, M. (2011), Spazi di Negoziazione, Povertà urbana e consumi alimentari, Milan: FrancoAngeli.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bistagnino, L. (2009), Design Sistemico, Progettare la sostenibilità produttiva e ambientale, Bra: Slow Food Editore.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bottiglieri, M. (2017), ‘Il diritto al cibo in città: Senso e possibilità’, Journal of Universities and International Development Cooperation, 1:1, pp. 388–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bottiglieri, M., Pettenati, G. and Toldo, A. (2017), Turin Food Policy: Buone pratiche e prospettive, Milan: Franco Angeli.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Campagnaro, C. and Ceraolo, S. (2017), ‘Fighting food waste towards a new social food chain: The Egg of Columbus workshop’, International Journal of Food Design, 2:1, pp. 103–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Campagnaro, C. and Di Prima, N. (2018), ‘Empowering actions: The participatory renovation of a shelter’, Interventions/Adaptive Reuse, 9:1, pp. 68–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Campagnaro, C., Di Prima, N. and Porcellana, V. (2017), ‘Quando l’antropologia incontra il design: Riflessioni a margine di una ricerca-azione a contrasto dell’homelessness’, Illuminazioni, 42:1, pp. 229–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Campagnaro, C. and Porcellana, V. (2013), ‘Il bello che cura: Benessere e spazi di accoglienza notturna per persone senza dimora’, Cambio: Rivista delle trasformazioni sociali, 3:5, pp. 35–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Campagnaro, C. and Porcellana, V. (2015), ‘Alimenta: Access to food action’, in L. Galimberti, A. Meloni and M. Ferrara (eds), Design for Food and Nutrition, Milan: ADI Associazione per il Disegno Industriale, pp. 84–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Campagnaro, C. and Porcellana, V. (2018), ‘Dalla strada alla casa: Oggetti e spazi domestici nei percorsi di inserimento abitativo di persone senza dimora’, Lares, 84:2, pp. 265–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Caraher, M. and Furey, S. (2017), ‘Is it appropriate to use surplus food to feed people in hunger? Short-term band-aid to more deep rooted problems of poverty’, Food Research Collaboration Policy Brief, 26 February, https://foodresearch.org.uk/publications/is-it-appropriate-to-use-surplus-food-to-feed-people-in-hunger/. Accessed 24 February 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Caritas Roma (2018), ‘Persone senza Dimora: Le sfide di un sistema integrato’, Caritas Roma, November, http://www.caritasroma.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Persone%20Senza%20Dimora%20WEB%20DEF_16%20nov.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiarini Tremblay, M., Hevner, A. R. and Berndt, D. J. (2010), ‘The use of focus groups in design research’, in A. Havner and S. Chatterjee (eds), Design Research in Information Systems, New York: Springer, pp. 121–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Città di Torino (2019), ‘Torino 2030 sostenibile e resiliente: Piano d’azione per la Torino del Futuro’, Città di Torino, November, https://www.torinovivibile.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TO2030_completo_web.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Città di Torino (2021), ‘Statuto della Città di Torino’, Città di Torino, September, http://www.comune.torino.it/amm_com/statuto/statuto_torino.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Coe, S. (2013), ‘Feeding the family: Are food prices having an effect?’, Nutrition Bulletin, 38:3, pp. 332–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Consoli, T. and Meo, A. (2020), Homelessness in Italia: Biografie, territori, politiche, Milan: FrancoAngeli.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Crawford, B., Yamazaki, R., Franke, E., Amanatidis, S., Ravulo, J., Steinbeck, K., Ritchie, J. and Torvaldsen, S. (2014), ‘Sustaining dignity? Food insecurity in homeless young people in urban Australia’, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 25:2, pp. 71–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cruciani, M. (2017), Il ruolo della conoscenza fattuale nella determinazione del significato: Negoziazione e contratti, Canterano: Aracne.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Darmon, N. and Drewnowski, A. (2008), ‘Does social class predict diet quality?’, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87:5, pp. 1107–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Dowler, E. (1998), ‘Food poverty and food policy’, IDS Bulletin, 29:1, pp. 58–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Dowler, E., Kneafsey, M., Lambie, A., Inman, A. and Collier, R. (2011), ‘Thinking about “food security”: Engaging with UK consumers’, Critical Public Health, 21:4, pp. 403–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dowler, E. and O’Connor, D. (2012), ‘Rights-based approaches to addressing food poverty and food insecurity in Ireland and UK’, Social Science & Medicine, 74:1, pp. 44–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Easton, C., Oudshoorn, A., Smith-Carrier, T., Forchuk, C. and Marshall, C. A. (2022), ‘The experience of food insecurity during and following homelessness in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-aggregation’, Health & Social Care in the Community, 30:6, pp. e3384–405.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fabri, M. and Newbutt, N. (2022), ‘Guest editorial: Designing enabling technologies for marginalised groups’, Journal of Enabling Technologies, 16:3, pp. 157–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Fassio, F. and Minotti, B. (2019), ‘Circular economy for food policy: The case study of the RePoPP project in the city of Turin (Italy)’, Sustainability, 11:21, pp. 60–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fio.PSD (2015), ‘Linee di indirizzo per il contrasto alla grave emarginazione adulta in ITALIA’, December, http://www.crivenezia.it/volontari/media/docs/articoli/sd2015_graveemarginazione.pdf. Accessed 24 February 2022.
  29. Fisher, T. (2009), ‘Needed: Design in the public interest’, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1 May, https://www.chronicle.com/article/needed–design–in–the–public–interest/. Accessed 1 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Fitzpatrick, K. M. and Willis, D. E. (2021), ‘Homeless and hungry: Food insecurity in the land of plenty’, Food Security, 13:1, pp. 3–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Franklin, B., Jones, A., Love, D., Puckett, S., Mackin, J. and White-Means, S. (2012), ‘Exploring mediators of food insecurity and obesity: A review of recent literature’, Journal of Community Health, 37:1, pp. 253–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Germak, C. and Giorgi, C. De (2008), ‘Exploring design’, in C. Germak (ed.), Uomo al centro del progetto: Design per un nuovo umanesimo (Man at the Centre of the Project: Design for a New Humanism), Turin: Umberto Allemandi & C, pp. 53–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Guazzo, C., Quaglia, A. P. and Toldo, A. (2018), Indagine sulle pratiche di contrasto alla povertà e allo spreco alimentare a Torino, Turin: ESTA, https://assesta.it/progetti/indagine-sulle-pratiche-di-contrasto-alla-poverta-e-allo-spreco-alimentare-a-torino/. Accessed 20 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Homeless Link (2022), ‘The unhealthy state of homelessness 2022: Findings from the homeless health needs audit’, 27 October, https://homelesslink-1b54.kxcdn.com/media/documents/Unhealthy_State_of_Homelessness_2022.pdf. Accessed 29 December 2022.
  35. IDEO (2014), ‘The future of prototyping is now live’, IDEO, 17 March, https://www.designkit.org/methods/live-prototyping. Accessed 15 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jones, P. H. and van Patter, G. K. (2009), Design 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0: The Rise of Visual Sensemaking, New York: NextDesign Leadership Institute.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kawulich, B. B. (2005), ‘Participant observation as a data collection method’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6:2, https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/466/997. Accessed 15 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Koh, K. A., Bharel, M. and Henderson, D. C. (2016), ‘Nutrition for homeless populations: Shelters and soup kitchens as opportunities for intervention’, Public Health Nutrition, 19:7, pp. 1312–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J. and Wensveen, S. (2011), Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom, Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, B. A. and Greif, M. J. (2008), ‘Homelessness and hunger’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49:11, pp. 3–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Manzini, E. (2014a), ‘Design and policies for collaborative services’, in C. Bason (ed.), Design for Policy, New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 103–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Manzini, E. (2014b), ‘Making things happen: Social innovation and design making things happen: Social innovation and design’, Design Issues, 30:1, pp. 57–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Mari, V. and Vasile, M. (2020), ‘From recipe to collective improvisation: An ethnographic vignette about food assistance in Barriera di Milano, Turin’, LoSquaderno, 56:1, pp. 43–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Marzano, M. (2006), ‘Storia di un’arte empirica: un secolo di etnografia’, in M. Marzano (ed.), Etnografia e ricerca sociale, Bari: Edizioni Laterza, pp. 3–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mattelmäki, T. (2006), Design Probes, Vaajakoski: Gummerus Printing.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. McDonald, S. (2005), ‘Study actions in context: A qualitative shadowing method for organizational research’, Qualitative Research, 5:4, pp. 455–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Mortati, M., Villari, B., Maffei, S. and Arquilla, V. (2016), Le politiche per il design e il design per le politiche: dal focus sulla soluzione alla centralità della valutazione, Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Muirhead, V., Quiñonez, C., Figueiredo, R. and Locker, D. (2009), ‘Oral health disparities and food insecurity in working poor’, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 37:4, pp. 294–304.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Norman, D. (2005), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. O’Connor, N., Farag, K. and Baines, R. (2016), ‘What is food poverty? A conceptual framework’, British Food Journal, 118:2, pp. 429–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Pettenati, G., Tecco, N. and Toldo, A. (2019), Atlante del Cibo di Torino Metropolitana: Rapporto 2, Turin: Celid.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Phelan, J., Link, B. G., Moore, R. E. and Stueve, A. (1997), ‘The stigma of homelessness: The impact of the label “homeless” on attitudes toward poor persons’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 60:4, pp. 323–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Porcellana, V. and Campagnaro, C. (2019), ‘Progettare insieme: Processi partecipativi a contrasto dell’homelessness tra antropologia e design’, Antropologia Pubblica, 5:1, pp. 91–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Porcellana, V., Stefani, S. and Campagnaro, C. (2020), ‘A Torino non si muore di fame: Riflessioni antropologiche su cibo e povertà estrema’, Dada Rivista di Antropologia post-globale, 1:1, pp. 91–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Power, S. (2012), ‘From redistribution to recognition to representation: Social injustice and the changing politics of education’, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10:4, pp. 473–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Rittel, H. W. and Webber, M. M. (1973), ‘Dilemmas in a general theory of planning’, Policy Sciences, 4:2, pp. 155–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Sanders, E. B. N. and Stappers, P. J. (2008), ‘Co-creation and the new landscapes of design’, Co-Design, 4:1, pp. 799–809.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Sangiorgi, D. and Clark, B. (2004), ‘Toward a participatory design approach to service design’, in Participatory Design Conference, 2:1, Toronto, Canada, 27–31 July, New York: ACM Press, pp. 27–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Seligman, H. K., Jacobs, E. A., Lopez, A., Tschann, J. and Fernandez, A. (2012), ‘A food insecurity and glycemic control among low-income patients with type 2 diabetes’, Diabetes Care, 35:2, pp. 233–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Seppilli, T. (1994), ‘Per un’antropologia dell’alimentazione: Determinazioni, funzioni e significati psicoculturali della risposta sociale ad un bisogno biologico’, La ricerca Folklorica, 30:1, pp. 7–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sosenko, F., Livingstone, N. and Fitzpatrick, S. (2013), ‘Overview of food aid provision in Scotland’, Scottish Government Social Research, 12:1, pp. 12–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Strasser, J. A., Damrosch, S. and Gaines, J. (1991), ‘Nutrition and the homeless person’, Journal of Community Health Nursing, 8:2, pp. 65–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. The Care Collective (2020), The Care Manifesto: The Politics of Interdependence, New York: Verso Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Tse, C. and Tarasuk, V. (2008), ‘Nutritional assessment of charitable meal programmes serving homeless people in Toronto’, Public Health Nutrition, 11:12, pp. 1296–305.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Vingen, H. A. and Gallegos, D. (2014), ‘Defining food literacy and its components’, Appetite, 76:1, pp. 50–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Wilson, C. (2014), Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners, Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Wrieden, W. L., Anderson, A. S., Longbottom, P. J., Valentine, K., Stead, M., Caraher, M., Lang, T., Gray, B. and Dowler, E. (2007), ‘The impact of a community-based food skills intervention on cooking confidence, food preparation methods and dietary choices: An exploratory trial’, Public Health Nutrition, 10:2, pp. 203–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Zampollo, F. (2016), ‘What is food design? The complete overview of all food design sub: Disciplines and how they merge’, November, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310706545_What_is_Food_Design_The_complete_overview_of_all_Food_Design_sub–disciplines_and_how_they_merge. Accessed 24 January 2022.
  69. Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E. and Forlizzi, J. (2010), ‘An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach’, in DIS ‘10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Aarhus, Denmark, 16–20 August, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 310–19.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00063_1
Loading
Alimenta: A design-led systemic action against homelessness-related food poverty
International Journal of Food Design 8, 227 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd_00063_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00063_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00063_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): complexity; food access; food poverty; homelessness; participatory approach; systemic approach

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error