Communication ethics for online social movements: A study on Arab social networks on Twitter | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research
  4. Volume 14, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1751-9411
  • E-ISSN: 1751-942X

Abstract

Social media increasingly play a role in transforming activist movements in the Arab world into digital forms. This study examines the link between adherence of network members to digital communication ethics and the level of the movements’ success based on the conceptual grounding in communication theories of Jürgen Habermas and Taha Abdurrahman. We tried to evaluate the link between the success of online social movement actors and their ethical contents by asking: What are the ethical implications of online social movements that do succeed in actualizing their goals? Do social network users discuss communication ethics to agree on terms of use within these movements? What are the important issues of communicative action and challenges of rational discussion in Arab social media use? We used two case studies: the hashtag launched to support teachers’ rights in Jordan in 2019, and a Twitter network of Arab users discussing digital communication ethics. We used mixed-methods and case studies approaches; data collected from Twitter were analysed using social network analysis followed by qualitative content analysis. Key findings demonstrate positive effects of activists’ engagement in social networks, and that commitment to digital communication ethics, whether stemming from secular or religious frames of reference, is significant for the success of online social movements. The case of network proved itself to be an example of successful digital protest and ideal model for rational ethical communication. Content analysis revealed that teachers formed a social network that exhibited strong solidarity and cohesion, and relied – perhaps unconsciously – on rules and principles of ethical discussion, including truthfulness, credibility, transparency, respect, accuracy and responsibility. Content analysis of the ‘communication ethics’ network demonstrated that the majority of content was religiously oriented, produced mainly by religious figures, educational institutions, or accounts with pseudonyms that are influential by the sheer number of their followers.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00027_1
2021-04-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abd al-‘āl, Tariq. ( 2018;), ‘ Qawānīn khanq al-majāl al-‘ām. ’, Arab Foundation for Civil and Political Rights, http://www.afcpr-nedal.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%AC%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%85-converted.pdf. Accessed 15 December 2019.
  2. Abdurrahman, Taha. ( 2000), Su’ālu al-akhlāq: musāhamatun fī al-naqd al-akhlāqī li al-hadātha al-gharbīya, Casablanca: and Beurit:: al-Markaz al-Thaqāfī al-‘arabī;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdurrahman, Taha. ( 2011), Ḥiwarāt min ajl al-mustaqbal, Beirut:: Arab Network for Research and Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdurrahman, Taha. ( 2017), Dīn al-Ḥayā’: Min al-Fiqh al-I’timārī ilā al-Fiqh al-I’timānī, 3 vols, Beirut:: al-Mu’assasa al-ʿArabiyya lil-Fikr wal-Ibdāʿ;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Abokhodair, Norah, and Vieweg, Sarah. ( 2016;), ‘ Privacy & social media in the context of the Arab Gulf. ’, in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 672–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Aljazeera ( 2019;), ‘ Ba‘da intihā’ iḍrāb al-mu‘alimīn … malik al-urdun yakhruj ‘an ṣamṭih. ’, https://cutt.us/3ID55. Accessed 6 October 2019.
  7. ALLEA ( 2019;), ‘ Trust in science and changing landscapes of communication. ’, discussion paper #3, https://allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ALLEA_Trust_in_Science_and_Changing_Landscapes_of_Communication-1.pdf. Accessed 31 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Alsius, Savador. ( 2017;), ‘ From post-truth to post-aesthetics. ’, BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, doi: 10.1344/BiD2017.39.6.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Alterman, Eric. ( 2004), When Presidents Lie: A History of Official Deception and Its Consequences, New York:: Viking;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Areshidze, Giorgi. ( 2017;), ‘ Taking religion seriously? Habermas on religious translation and cooperative learning in post-secular society. ’, American Political Science Review, 111:4, pp. 724–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Arnett, Ronald C.,, Arneson, Pat, and Bell, Leeanne M.. ( 2006;), ‘ Communication ethics: The dialogic turn. ’, Review of Communication, 6:1&2, pp. 62–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Button, Andrew. ( 2016;), ‘ What are key principles of ethical communication?. ’, http://www.ehow.com/info_8406730_key-principles-ethical-communication.html. Accessed 8 December 2020.
  13. Calhoun, Craig,, Mendieta, Eduardo, and VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. (eds) ( 2013), Habermas and Religion, , 1st ed.., Cambridge, MA:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Capurro, Rafael. ( 2008;), ‘ Intercultural information ethics. ’, in K. E. Himma, and H. T. Tavani. (eds), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley;, pp. 639–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Computer Hope ( 2020;), ‘ Social network. ’, 8 February, https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/s/socinetw.htm. Accessed 15 May 2020.
  16. Couldry, Nick. ( 2013;), ‘ Why media ethics still matters. ’, in S. J. A. Ward. (ed.), Global Media Ethics: Problems and Perspectives, Chichester:: Wiley-Blackwell;, pp. 13–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Davisson, Amber, and Booth, Paul. ( 2016), Controversies in Digital Ethics, New York:: Bloomsbury Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. The Economist ( 2016;), ‘ Post-truth politics: Art of the lie. ’, 10 September, http://www.economist.com/node/21706525/all-comments. Accessed 3 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. The Economist ( 2019;), ‘ Arabs are losing faith in religious parties and leaders. ’, 7 December, https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2019/12/07/arabs-are-losing-faith-in-religious-parties-and-leaders. Accessed 20 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ess, Charles. ( 2017;), ‘ Digital media ethics. ’, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, England:: Oxford University Press;, https://cutt.ly/fk7OaVg. Accessed 15 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fourie, Pieter. ( 2017;), ‘ Normative media theory in the digital media landscape: From media ethics to ethical communication. ’, Communicatio, 43:2, pp. 109–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fuchs, Christian. ( 2018), Digital Demagogue: Authoritarian Capitalism in the Age of Trump and Twitter, London:: Pluto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Görzig, Anke, and Frumkin, Lara A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Cyberbullying experiences on-the-go: When social media can become distressing. ’, Cyberpsychology, 7:1, p. 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Habermas, Jürgen. ( 1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (trans. T. McCarthy.), Boston, MA:: Beacon Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Habermas, Jürgen. ( 1994), Postmetaphysical Thinking (trans. W. M. Hohengarten.), Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hutchinson, Andrew. ( 2019;), ‘ 10 social media statistics you need to know in 2019. ’, Social Media Today, 21 July, https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/10-social-media-statistics-you-need-to-know-in-2019-infographic/559181/. Accessed 21 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyde-Clarke, Nathalie. ( 2011), Communication and Media Ethics in South Africa, Cape Town:: Juta and Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Jarrar, Shaker, and Ali, Dua’a. ( 2019;), ‘ Iḍrāb min ajl al-ṣāliḥ al-‘ām. ’, 7iber, https://cutt.ly/7k7A4Nx. Accessed 14 September 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson, Brett G., and Kelling, Kimberly. ( 2018;), ‘ Placing Facebook. ’, Journalism Practice, 12:7, pp. 817–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Jordan Law News ( 2019;), ‘ Twitter: Ma‘_al_mu‘alim qabla sā‘āt min i‘tisāmih. ’, https://cutt.us/wuyw9. Accessed 28 October 2019.
  31. Jost, John T.,, Barberá, Pablo,, Bonneau, Richard,, Langer, Melanie,, Metzger, Megan,, Nagler, Jonathan,, Sterling, Joanna, and Tucker, Joshua A.. ( 2018;), ‘ How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. ’, Political Psychology, 39:S1, pp. 85–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Karatzogianni, Athina. ( 2006), The Politics of Cyberconflict, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Keijzer, Marijn,, Mäs, Michael, and Flache, Andreas. ( 2018;), ‘ Communication in online social networks fosters cultural isolation. ’, Complexity, 2018:4, pp. 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Krebs, Valdis. ( 2000;), ‘ The social life of routers. ’, Internet Protocol Journal, 3:4, pp. 14–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kumar, Srijan,, Cheng, Justin, and Leskovec, Jure. ( 2017;), ‘ Antisocial behavior on the web: Characterization and detection. ’, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, Taipei, 20–24 April, doi: 10.1145/3041021.3051106.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lexico ( 2020;), ‘ Post-truth. ’, https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/post-truth. Accessed 20 May 2020.
  37. Magnetic Channel ( 2019;), ‘ Schools and the teachers’ strike. ’, Birnāmaj ‘al-Baraka, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMNROlRnPoo&feature=share. Accessed 12 September 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Malkawi, Asma H.. ( 2017), Akhlāqīyāt al-Tawāsul fī al-‘aṣr al-raqamī (‘Communication ethics in the digital age’), Beirut:: Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies;, p. 35.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Malkawi, Asma H.. ( 2018;), ‘ Al-ḥarakāt al-iḥtijājīya al-raqamīya fī al-mintaqa al-‘arabīya wa Taḥawulāt al-majāl al-‘ām: Dirāsa zahirātīya li al-ḥāla al-urdunīya. ’, Al-Jazeera Center for Studies, 3 December, http://studies.aljazeera.net/ar/mediastudies/2018/12/181203090043436.html. Accessed 10 October 2019.
  40. Maqurah, Jallul. ( 2015), Falsafat al-tawāṣul fī al-fikr al-ʻArabīAal-muʻāṣir: Ṭāhạ̄ʻAbd al-Raḥmān wa-Nāṣīf Naṣṣār bayna al-qawmīyah wa-al-kawnīyah, Beirut:: Center for Study of Arab Unity;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Mellouk, Abdulqader. ( 2018), Min ta‘adudiyat al-akhlāq ilā akhlāq al-ta‘adudiya, Doha:: Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Nations, Daniel. ( 2020;), ‘ What is social networking?. ’, Lifewire, 13 February, https://www.lifewire.com/what-is-social-networking-3486513. Accessed 10 October 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Northwestern University in Qatar ( 2019;), ‘ A seven-nation survey: Media use in the Middle East. ’, February, http://www.mideastmedia.org/survey/2018/about/#s345. Accessed 31 December 2019.
  44. Plaisance, Patrick Lee. ( 2013), Media Ethics: Key Principles for Responsible Practice, California:: Sage Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Portier, Philippe. ( 2011;), ‘ Religion and democracy in the thought of Jürgen Habermas. ’, Society, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-011-9470-3. Accessed 17 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Shahbaz, Adrian. ( 2018;), ‘ Freedom on the Net: The rise of digital authoritarianism. ’, Freedom House, https://cutt.ly/dk7UvIg. Accessed 15 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Shirky, Clay. ( 2011;), ‘ The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. ’, Foreign Affairs, 90:1, pp. 28–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Smith, Marc,, Rainie, Lee,, Shneiderman, Ben, and Himelboim, Itai. ( 2014;), ‘ Mapping Twitter topic networks: From polarized crowds to community clusters. ’, Pew Research Center, 20 February, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/. Accessed 30 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Soraj, Hongladarom, and Ess, Charles. ( 2007), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, Los Angeles:: Idea Group Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. St. Amant, Kirk. ( 2007), Linguistic and Cultural Online Communication Issues in the Global Age, Hershey, PA:: Information Science Reference;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Steinmetz, Katy. ( 2016;), ‘ Oxford’s word of the year for 2016 is “post truth”. ’, Time, 15 November, https://time.com/4572592/oxford-word-of-the-year-2016-post-truth/. Accessed 12 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Twitter ( 2020;), ‘ Twitter terms of service. ’, https://twitter.com/en/tos. Accessed 12 May 2020.
  53. Malkawi, Asma H., and Ambusaidi, Khamis. ( 2021;), ‘ Communication ethics for online social movements: A study on Arab social networks on Twitter. ’, Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 14:1, pp. 117–142, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr_00027_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00027_1
Loading
Communication ethics for online social movements: A study on Arab social networks on Twitter
Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research 14, 117 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr_00027_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00027_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00027_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): communication ethics; hashtag activism; Jürgen Habermas; online social movements; social network analysis; Taha Abdurrahman

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error