Multimodal Islamophobia: Gendered stereotypes in memes | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1751-9411
  • E-ISSN: 1751-942X

Abstract

This article focuses on the potential of memes as apparently innocuous communicative digital tools to spread gendered Islamophobia. Following Segev et al.’s (2015) theories of meme families, we studied a corpus of 100 memes retrieved from popular internet meme sites from 2017 to 2021. We applied the principles of multimodal discourse analysis to analyse Shifman’s three dimensions of memes (content, form and stance) and described a large sample of memes, categorizing them into three popular tropes of Muslim women found in literature and electronic media. Our findings revealed that most misogynistic Islamophobic memes characterize Muslim women as oppressed by their own community. A smaller degree of memes portrays Muslim women’s bodies as sexualized and assailable, and finally very few memes depict them as terrorists. We contend that internet memes can be a powerful and efficient means to disseminate vitriolic rhetoric in a subtle and camouflaged way leading to the trivialization and, eventually, acceptance of their hateful discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00063_1
2023-09-19
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agathangelou, A. M. and Ling, L. H. M. (2004), ‘Power, borders, security, wealth: Lessons of violence and desire from September 11’, International Studies Quarterly, 48:3, pp. 51738.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguilera-Carnerero, C. and Azeez, A. H. (2016), ‘“Islamonausea, not Islamophobia”: The many faces of cyberhate speech’, Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 9:1, pp. 2140, https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.9.1.21_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Akbarzadeh, S. and Smith, B. J. (2005), The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Media (The Age and Herald Newspapers), Melbourne: Monash University.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali, I. (2020), ‘Muslim women meme-ing citizenship in the era of War on Terror militarism’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 106:3, pp. 33440, https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2020.1785629.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Awan, I. (2012), ‘“I’m a Muslim not an extremist”: How the prevent strategy has constructed a “suspect community”’, Politics & Policy, 40:6, pp. 115885.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bail, C. (2015), Terrified: How Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. and McEnery, T. (2013), ‘Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word “Muslim” in the British press 1998–2009’, Applied Linguistics, 34:3, pp. 125, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barthes, R. (1977), Image-Music-Text, London: Fontana Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Beydoun, K. A. (2018), American Islamophobia: Understanding the Roots and Rise of Fear, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Billig, M. (2001), ‘Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Klu Klux Klan’, Discourse & Society, 12:3, pp. 26789, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003001.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bogerts, L. and Fielitz, M. (2019), ‘“Do you want meme war?” Understanding the visual memes of the German Far Right’, in M. Feilitz and N. Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far-Right Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 13754.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bullock, K. H. (2000), ‘The gaze and colonial plans for the unveiling of Muslim women’, Studies in Contemporary Islam, 2:2, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bullock, K. H. and Jafri, G. (2002), ‘Media (mis)representations: Muslim women in the Canadian nation’, Canadian Women’s Studies, 20:2, pp. 3540.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chao, E. C. (2015), ‘The-truth-about-Islam.com: Ordinary theories of racism and cyber Islamophobia’, Critical Sociology, 41:1, pp. 5775.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Crawford, B. (2020), ‘The influence of memes in far-right radicalisation’, CARR, 9 June, https://www.radicalrightanalysis.com/2020/06/09/the-influence-of-memes-on-far-right-radicalisation/. Accessed 18 December 2021.
  16. Dahinden, U., Koch, C., Wyss, V. and Keel, G. (2011), ‘Representation of Islam and Christianity in the Swiss media’, Journal of Empirical Theology, 24:2, pp. 197208, https://doi.org/10.1163/157092511X603983.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Davidson, P. (2012), ‘The language of (internet) memes’, in M. Mandiberg (ed.), The Social Media Reader, New York: NYU Press, pp. 12027.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dawkins, R. ([1976] 1989), The Selfish Gene, new ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eisenstein, Z. (1994), ‘Writing hatred on the body’, New Political Science, 15:3&4, pp. 522.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fahmi, S. (2004), ‘Picturing Afghan women. A content analysis of AP wire photographs during the Taliban regime before and after the fall of the Taliban regime’, Gazette: The International Journal of Communication Studies, 66:2, pp. 91112, https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549204041472.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fanon, F. (1965), A Dying Colonialism, New York: Grove Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Farokhi, Z. (2021), ‘Cyber homo sacer: A critical analysis of cyber Islamophobia in the wake of the Muslim Ban’, Islamophobia Studies Journal, 6:1, pp. 1432.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Feldman, M. (2019), ‘“Just joking” is not joke: How the alt-right really communicates online’, in W. Allchorn (ed.), Tracking the Rise of the Radical Right Globally, Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag, pp. 35962.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fielitz, M. and Thurston, N. (eds) (2019), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Forceville, C. (2008), ‘Pictorial and multimodal metaphor’, in E. McQuarrie and B. Phillips (eds), Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 272310, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-011.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Forchtner, B. and Kølvraa, C. (2017), ‘Extreme right images of radical authenticity: Multimodal aesthetics of history, nature, and gender roles in social media’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 4:3, pp. 25281, https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2017.1322910.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gal, N. (2019), ‘Ironic humour on social media as participatory boundary work’, New Media & Society, 21:3, pp. 72949, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444818805719.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O. and Sakki, I. (2020), ‘Persuasion through bitter humour: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland’, Social Media & Society, 6:2, pp. 111, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliday, M. A. K. ([1985] 1994), An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Huntington, S. P. (1993), ‘The clash of civilizations?’, Foreign Affairs, 72:3, pp. 2249.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jakobson, R. (1963), Essais de Linguistique Generale, Paris: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jenkins, H., Ford, S. and Green, J. (2013), Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture, New York: NYU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jewitt, C. (2016), ‘Multimodal analysis’, in A. Georgakopoulou and T. Spilioti (eds), Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 6984.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kingdon, A. (2021), ‘The meme is the method: Examining the power of the image within extremist propaganda’, in A. Lavorgna and T. J. Holt (eds), Researching Cybercrimes: Methodologies, Ethics, and Critical Approaches, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 30125.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Knobel, M. and Lankshear, C. (2006), ‘Online memes, affinities, and cultural production’, in M. Knobel and C. Lankshear (eds), A New Literacy Sampler, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 199227.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kress, G. (2010), Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kress, G. (2012), ‘Multimodal discourse analysis’, in J. P. Gee and M. Hanford (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 3550.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. ([1996] 2006), Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kutty, S. (1997), Speaking for Her: The Representation of the Muslim Woman in Popular Culture, Scarborough: Canadian Muslim Civil Liberties Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Larsson, G. (2007), ‘Cyber-Islamophobia? The case of WikiIslam’, Contemporary Islam, 1:1, pp. 5367, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-007-0002-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mattheis, A. (2019), ‘Manifesto memes: The radical right’s new dangerous visual rhetorics’, Rantt Media, 19 September, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/countering-radical-right/manifesto-memes-the-radical-rights-new-dangerous-visual-rhetorics/. Accessed 23 March 2022.
  42. McCloud, S. (1994), Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art, New York: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Milner, R. (2012), ‘The world made meme: Discourse and identity in participatory media’, Ph.D. thesis, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Milner, R. (2013), ‘Media lingua franca: Fixity, novelty, and vernacular creativity in internet memes’, in AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, vol. 14, Denver, CO: USA, https://spir.aoir.org/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/8725. Accessed 17 December 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Mohanty, C. (1984), ‘Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses’, Boundary, 2:12&13, pp. 33358.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Moore, K., Mason, P. and Lewis, J. (2008), The Representation of British Muslims in the National Print News Media 2000–2008, Cardiff: Cardiff School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Perry, B. (2014), ‘Gendered Islamophobia: Hate crime against Muslim women’, Social Identities, 20:1, pp. 7489, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2013.864467.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pintak, L., Bowe, B. J. and Albright, J. (2021), ‘Influencers, amplifiers, and icons: A systematic approach to understanding the roles of Islamophobic actors on Twitter’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99:4, pp. 95579.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ramírez, Á. (2014), ‘Control over female “Muslim” bodies: Culture, politics and dress code laws in some Muslim and non-Muslim countries’, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 22:6, pp. 67186, https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2014.950972.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ruby, T. (2004), Immigrant Muslim Women and the Hijab: Sites of Struggle in Crafting and Negotiating Identities in Canada, Saskatoon: Community-University Institute for Social Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Runnymede Trust (1997), Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All, London: The Runnymede Trust, https://www.runnymedetrust.org/publications/islamophobia-a-challenge-for-us-all. Accessed 20 March 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Saeed, A. (2007), ‘Media, racism and islamophobia: The representation of Islam and Muslims in the media’, Sociology Compass, 1:2, pp. 44362.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Said, E. W. (1978), Orientalism, New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Segev, E., Nissenbaum, A., Stolero, N. and Shifman, L. (2015), ‘Families and networks of internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 20:4, pp. 41733.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Shifman, L. (2014), Memes in Digital Culture, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Shyrock, A. (ed.) (2010), Islamophobia/Islamophilia: Beyond the Politics of Enemy and Friend, Indiana Series in Middle East Studies, Bloomington, IN and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Tayyen, S. (2017), ‘From Orientalist sexual object to burkini terrorist threat: Muslim women through evolving lens’, Islamophobia Studies Journal, 4:1, pp. 10114, https://doi.org/10.13169/islastudj.4.1.0101.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Toffler, A. (1980), The Third Wave, New York: Bantam.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ul Hassan Sumra, A. (2020) ‘Muslims and Islam in Indian English press: Exploring the islamophobic discourse’, Islamophobia Studies Journal, 5:2, pp. 22637.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Whittaker, B. (2002), ‘Islam and the British press after 9/11’, al-bab blog, https://al-bab.com/special-topics/islam-and-british-press-after-september-11. Accessed 12 December 2014.
  61. Wiggins, B. E. (2019), The Discourse Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics and Intertextuality, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Yoon, I. (2016), ‘Why is it not a joke? Analysis of internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colourblindness’, Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 33:1, pp. 92123.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Yus, F. (2019), ‘Multimodality in memes. A cyberpragmatic approach’, in P. Bou-Franch and P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds), Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 10531.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Zappavigna, M. (2012), Discourse of Twitter and Social Media, London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Zempi, I. and Awan, I. (2016), Islamophobia: Lived Experiences of Online and Offline Victimisation, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Zimbardo, Z. (2014), ‘Cultural politics of humor in (de)normalizing islamophobic stereotypes’, Islamophobia Studies Journal, 2:1, pp. 5981, https://doi.org/10.13169/islastudj.2.1.0059.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00063_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jammr_00063_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error