Signwriting: Ornament as visual language – communicative decoration | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2052-0204
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

This article argues for the use of decorative signwriting as both ornamental and communicative. This examination will be twofold: first, a series of images of twentieth century signwriting in the fairground industry will be offered to this argument: all signwriting is purposefully applied, as decoration, in order to communicate, but unpicking the visual styles will unveil the hidden meanings, expanding the communicative intentions. Secondly, works of signwriting produced and installed as an will be dissected to expand on the argument being made. The is a framework being theoretically structured and then applied in practice within my Ph.D. enquiry. It advances the theories and workings of both the archive and artistic archive: the facilitates the collation of dubious and disputed narratives, alongside archival fragments: told through communicative signwriting, it demands the participation of the viewer in its installation. Using the methodology of this practice-led research will contribute to confirming how the application of a visual language to signwriting enables the production of works that are both ornamental and communicative.

This argument has been formed, primarily, due to my informed fairground position: embedded within fairground heritage my upbringing has established an appreciation for its rich history, which is reflected in my practice, which blends traditional signwriting and illustrative storytelling. This informed fairground position, combined with my Ph.D. enquiry, enriches the analysis and understanding of the practice-led research within the realm of this article: offering a valuable opportunity to not only comment on the historical works presented, but also to showcase an exploration of how to apply this visual production to contemporary, installation situations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00007_1
2019-08-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brown, Frances . (2001), Fairground Strollers and Showfolk, Taunton:: Ronda Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hampson, Mark . (2012), Almost Real Art - A Satirical Archaeology of the RA Collections, London:: Royal Academy;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jones, Barbara . (1951), The Unsophisticated Arts, London:: The Architectural Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lewery, Tony . (2005), Signwritten Art, Devon:: David & Charles Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lissitzky, El . (1996);, ' Dissenting spaces. ', in Bruce W. Ferguson . (ed.), Thinking about Exhibitions, London:: Routledge;, pp. 307-312.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rose, Gillian . (2001), Visual Methodologies, New York:: Sage Publications Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Trowell, Ian . (2016);, ' Collision, collusion and coincidence: Pop Art's fairground parallel. ', Visual Culture in Britain, 17:3, pp. 329-350, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14714787.2016.1250670. Accessed 20 May 2019 .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ware, Michael E. . (1977), Historic Fairground Scenes, Nottingham:: Moorland Publishing Co.;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Weedon, Geoff . (1985), Fairground Art, New York:: Abbeville Press Inc;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, A. . (2019);, ' Signwriting: Ornament as visual language - communicative decoration. ', Journal of Illustration, 6:1, pp. 119-136, doi: 10.1386/jill_00007_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00007_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jill_00007_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): art; communication; decorative; fairground; illustrative; ornamental; signwriting
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error