Collaborative poaching: Compossibilities, notes, traces and narrative imagination | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1753-5190
  • E-ISSN: 1753-5204

Abstract

This article suggests a method for cultivating a collaborative method of shared visual note-taking on seminar readings and discussions, built on the method of creative ‘poaching’ of each other’s contributions, using pencil and simple tracing technique on transparent papers. The method was developed and tested in a decade of workshops with the author and varying groups of participants, students, researchers and professionals, in academic text-based discussions, lectures and seminars. The method, speculative and collaborative, aims to assemble the participants’ ideas and contributions in compossible ways, that is, possibilities that support each other to build more convivial forms of annotation and idea generation, and where contributions flow into each other and with no clear delineation of order or between authors/contributors. This method of collaborative poaching produced convincing results and could be used as an exercise in semi-structured discussions and their creative documentation, cultivating a multiplicity of perspectives on human values and also support what Martha Nussbaum calls a ‘narrative imagination’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00012_1
2021-01-01
2024-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnheim, Rudolf. ( 1969), Visual Thinking, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brotchie, Alastair, and Gooding, Mel. (eds) ( 1995), A Book of Surrealist Games, Boston, MA:: Shambhala;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Caillois, Roger. ( 2001), Man, Play and Games, Urbana, IL:: University of Illinois Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Bono, Edward. ( 1973), Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step, New York:: Harper Colophon;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Certeau, Michel. ( 1984), The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deleuze, Gilles. ( 2006), The Fold, London:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. ( 2004), A Thousand Plateaus, New York:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fry, Tony. ( 2009), Design Futuring, Oxford:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jencks, Charles, and Silver, Nathan. ( 1973), Adhocism: The Case for Improvisation, New York:: Doubleday & Co;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jenkins, Henry. ( 1992), Textual Poachers, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Klee, Paul. ( 1972), Pedagogical Sketchbook, New York:: Praeger;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nancy, Jean-Luc. ( 2000), Being Singular Olural, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nancy, Jean-Luc, and Kate, Laurens. ( 2011;), ‘ “Cum” … revisited: Preliminaries to thinking the interval. ’, in H. Oosterling, and E. P. Ziarek. (eds), Intermedialities: Philosophy, Arts, Politics, Lanham, MD:: Lexinton Books;, pp. 3744.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nussbaum, Martha. ( 1997), Cultivating Humanity, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ranciere, Jacques. ( 2010), Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics, New York:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Spring, Peter. ( 2008;), ‘ Adaptive assembly. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 1:2, pp. 12332.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. von Busch, Otto. ( 2008), Fashion-able: Hacktivism and Engaged Fashion Design, Gothenburg:: ArtMonitor;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. von Busch, Otto. ( 2021;) ‘ Collaborative poaching: Compossibilities, notes, traces and narrative imagination. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 14:1, pp. 2742, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00012_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00012_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00012_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error