‘Navigating the bubble’: Exploring student experiences of design writing | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1753-5190
  • E-ISSN: 1753-5204

Abstract

Undergraduate design students at London College of Communication were interviewed about the relationship between their writing practice and their design practice. Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences (1983) framed the study. This article takes the position that polarizing the relationship between linguistic (textual) and bodily kinaesthetic (visual) forms of intelligence itself becomes a barrier to arts students’ epistemological development. The well-rehearsed art school rhetoric of ‘I’m a visual person not a writer’ can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, disabling the potential to learn through writing. The research explored student perceptions and experiences of design writing, with data surfacing themes of anxiety, identity, artefact, articulation, process and value. Suggestions about how to support students to write about design praxis are presented for consideration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00013_1
2021-01-01
2024-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Austerlitz, N.,, Blythman, M.,, Grove-White, A.,, Jones, B. A.,, Jones, C. A.,, Morgan, S. J.,, Orr, S.,, Shreeve, A., and Vaughan, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Mind the gap: Expectations, ambiguity and pedagogy within art and design higher education. ’, in L. Drew. (ed.), The Student Experience in Art and Design Higher Education: Drivers for Change, Cambridge:: Jill Rogers Associates Limited;, pp. 12548.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards, H.. ( 2005), Writing PAD Survey of Practices, London:: Goldsmiths, University of London;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardner, H.. ( 2006), The Development and Education of the Mind: The Selected Works of Howard Gardner, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hockey, J.. ( 1993;), ‘ Research methods: Researching peers and familiar settings. ’, Research Papers in Education, 8:2, pp. 199225.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Industrial and Theoretical Contexts ( 2014), ITC Assignment Brief, London:: London College of Communication;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lea, M. R., and Street, B. V.. ( 2000;), ‘ Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. ’, in M. R. Lea, and B. Stierer. (eds), Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts, Milton Keynes:: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education;, pp. 3246.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lockheart, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ The importance of writing as a material practice for art and design students: A contemporary rereading of the Coldstream Reports. ’, Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 17:2, pp. 15175.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. McCannon, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ Towards the hybrid essay: The “Visual Essay Project”. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 4:2, pp. 13140.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Orr, S., and Blythman, M.. ( 2002;), ‘ The process of design is almost like writing an essay. ’, Academia , https://www.academia.edu/651135/The_process_of_design_is_almost_like_writing_an_essay. Accessed 27 September 2020.
  10. Oxford English Dictionary ( 2020), Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Stake, R.. ( 1995), The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Vygotsky, L.. ( 1978), Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wood, D.,, Bruner, J. S., and Ross, G.. ( 1976;), ‘ The role of tutoring in problem solving. ’, Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 17:2, pp. 89100.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wood, J.. ( 1998;), ‘ The culture of academic rigour: Does design research really need it?. ’, Design Journal, 3:1, pp. 4457.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith, Catherine. ( 2021;) ‘ “Navigating the bubble”: Exploring student experiences of design writing. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 14:1, pp. 4357, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00013_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jwcp_00013_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error