Essay on performance writing: Pataphysical Oulipo-ian perspective on the rationalist programme

References

1. Alvesson, M.. ( 2013), The Triumph of Emptiness: Consumption, Higher Education, and Work Organization, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bachelard, G.. ( [1938] 2002), The Formation of the Scientific Mind, Paris:: Gallimard;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baudrillard, J.. ( 1968), Le système des objets, Paris:: Gallimard;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bergvall, C.. ( 1996), Keynote Paper for Performance Writing Symposium, Dartington, https://docplayer.net/38120436-Caroline-bergvall-keynote-what-do-we-mean-by-performance-writing-w.html. Accessed 25 November 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cazeaux, C.. ( 2017), Art, Research, Philosophy, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fang, H.. ( 2011;), ‘ Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly. ’, Scientometrics, 87:2, pp. 293–301.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Feyerabend, P.. ( 2010), Against the Method, New York:: Verso;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Feyerabend, P.. ( 2011), The Tyranny of Science, London:: Wiley;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gasparin, M.,, Brown, S.D,, Green, W.,, Hugill, A.,, Lilley, S.,, Quinn, Q.,, Schinckus, C.,, Williams, M., and Zalasiewicz, J.. ( forthcoming 2020;), ‘ The business school in the Anthropocene: Parasite logic and pataphysical reasoning for a working earth. ’, Academy of Management Learning & Education.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ginev, D.. ( 1995;), ‘ Between epistemology and hermeneutics. ’, Science & Education, 4:1, pp. 147–59.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Greene, B.. ( 2011), The Hidden Reality, New York:: Random House;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grivell, L.. ( 2006;), ‘ Through a glass darkly: The present and the future of editorial peer review. ’, EMBO Reports, 7:6, pp. 567–70.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gura, T.. ( 2002;), ‘ Peer review, unmasked. ’, Nature, 416:6878, pp. 258–60.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hall, J.. ( 2007), Thirteen Ways of Talking about Performance Writing: A Lecture, Plymouth:: Plymouth College of Art Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Heelan, P.. ( 1972;), ‘ Hermeneutics of experimental sci-ence in the context of the life-world. ’, Philosophia Mathematica, 9:14, pp. 101–14.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Holton, G.. ( 1978), The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hugill, A.. ( 2012), Pataphysics: A Useless Guide, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Izak, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Learning from a fool: Searching for the “unmanaged” context for radical learning. ’, Management Learning, 46:1, pp. 87–104.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jarry, A.. ( [1911] 1965), Selected Works of Alfred Jarry (trans. Roger Shattuck, and Simon Watson Taylor.), London:: Methuen;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kuhn, T.. ( 1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL:: The University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lakatos, I.. ( 1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Cambridge:: Cambrige University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Latour, B., and Woolgar, S.. ( 1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Los Angeles, CA:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lawrence, P. A.. ( 2003;), ‘ The politics of publication. ’, Nature, 422:6919, pp. 259–61.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lightman, A.. ( 2006a), A Sense of the Mysterious: Science and the Human Spirit, New York:: Vintage Publisher;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lightman, A.. ( 2006b), The Discoveries: Great Breakthroughs in 20th-Century Science, New York:: Vintage Publisher;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lyotard, J.-F.. ( 1979), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Miller, A.. ( 1995;), ‘ Aesthetics, representation and creativity in art and science. ’, Leonardo, 28:3, pp. 185–92.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Miller, A.. ( 2001), Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time and the Beauty That Causes Havoc, London:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Nietzsche, F.. ( [1872] 1967), The Birth of Tragedy (trans. W. Kaufmann.), London:: Random House;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. New Dunkin’ Donuts and Career Builder Survey ( 2013;), ‘ New Dunkin’ Donuts & CareerBuilder Survey Reveals Which Professionals Need Coffee the Most. ’ https://news.dunkindonuts.com/blog/new-dunkin-donuts-careerbuilderR-survey-reveals-which-professionals-need-coffee-the-most. Accessed 12 October 2020.
31. Penrose, R., and Stachel, J.. ( 2005), Einstein’s Miraculous Year: Five Papers That Changed the Face of Physics, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Perec, G.. ( 1969), La Disparition, Paris:: Gallimard;.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Popper, K.. ( [1934] 2002), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London:: Routledge Editions;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Quine, W.. ( [1960] 2013), Word and Object, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ritson, S., and Camilleri, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Contested boundaries: The string theory debates and ideologies of science. ’, Perspective on Science, 23:2, pp. 192–227.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Rocha, B.. ( 2001;), ‘ Trouble with peer review. ’, Nature Immunology, 2:94, pp. 277–81.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rorty, R.. ( 1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Roubaud, J.. ( 2009;), ‘ Poetry and orality. ’, in M. Perloff, and C. Dworking. (eds), The Sound of Poetry, the Poetry of Sound, Chicago, IL:: Chicago University Press;, pp. 2–12.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sang-Hoon, K.. ( 2004;), ‘ Fractal structure of a white cauliflower. ’, Journal of Korean Physical Society, 46:2, pp. 474–77.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schinckus, C.. ( 2016;), ‘ From cubist simultaneity to quantum complementarity. ’, Foundations of Science, 21:10, pp. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Schinckus, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ Delimitation of flatness in paintings. ’, Art and Perception, 6:1, pp. 67–75.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Serres, M.. ( 1982a), The Parasite, Minneapolis, MN:: Upress;.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Serres, M.. ( 1982b), Hermes: Literature, Science, Philosophy, Baltimore, MD:: Johns Hopkins;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Serres, M., and Latour, B.. ( 1995), Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time, Ann Arbor, MI:: University of Michigan Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Vaihinger, H.. ( 1911), Die Philosophie des Als Ob, Berlin:: Reuther & Reichard;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. van Fraassen, B.. ( 1991), Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Oxford:: Clarendon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Vince, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ Institutional illogics: The unconscious and institutional analysis. ’, Organization Studies, 40:7: pp. 953–73.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Zhen Liu, X., and Fang, H.. ( 2012;), ‘ Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly. Part II. ’, Scientometrics, 90:2, pp. 607–16.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Schinckus, Christophe. ( 2021;) ‘ Essay on performance writing: Pataphysical Oulipo-ian perspective on the rationalist programme. ’, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 14:1, pp. 59–77, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00014_1
    [Google Scholar]