An alternative future of digitized genetic information and digital procreation | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Technoetic Arts
  4. Volume 18, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

This research looks what happens to human reproduction when human genetic information is digitized. By employing speculative design as a transdisciplinary strategy to construct such an alternative future to open up public dialogues, it aims to stimulate audiences in an artistic way to deliberate two key questions: (1) how will biotechnology recondition and recontextualize the natural processes of genetic information (i.e. expression, replication, transmission and mutation) and our physiological processes (e.g. reproduction)? And (2) what might be the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) for using such biotechnology? To this end, this practice-based research introduces the (2019) – a speculative design project that has been developed as an approach to invite audiences to a future scenario of network-transmitted genetic information and computer-simulated human procreation. The carefully designed future service (an ironic practice of commercialization) allows human reproduction to take place outside of the human body. Audiences are encouraged to contemplate what novel situations might occur within their own futures and to consider broader questions like how family, parenthood, marriage, etc. are redefined and what new social relationships might emerge. By employing speculative design as an artistic research tool/tactic to step outside the technical limitations and craft the future service, the project asks vital question about the future in a provocative and quasi-realistic manner. Thus, the research forms a unique entanglement of sensitive topics by dealing with future biotechnology and human reproduction.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00025_1
2020-03-01
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auger, J.. ( 1994;), ‘ Speculative design: crafting the speculation. ’, Digital Creativity, 24:1, pp. 11–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Berson, S.. ( 2009;), ‘ Debating DNA collection. ’, National Institute of Justice, 28 October, https://www.nij.gov:443/journals/264/pages/debating-DNA.aspx. Accessed 22 April 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ DNA testing is popular, but many are unaware of privacy concerns. ’, Triple Pundit, 18 December, https://www.triplepundit.com/story/2018/dna-testing-popular-many-are-unaware-privacy-concerns/55936. Accessed 22 April 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cook-Deegan, R. M.. ( 1994), The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome, New York:: W. W. Norton & Co;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Critical Art Ensemble ( 1996;), ‘ The coming of age of the flesh machine. ’, in T. Druckrey., (ed.), Electronic Culture: Technology and Visual Representation, New York:: Aperture;, pp. 391–403.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunne, A., and Raby, F.. ( 2013), Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, Cambridge, MA, and London:: The MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Foucault, M.. ( 1990), The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction, , Rpt. ed.., London:: Penguin Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibson, D. G.,, Glass, J. I.,, Lartigue, C.,, Noskov, V. N.,, Chuang, R. -Y.,, Algire, M.A.,, Benders, G. A.,, Montague, M. G.,, Ma, L.,, Moodie, M. M.,, Merryman, C.,, Vashee, S.,, Krishnakumar, R.,, Assad-Garcia, N.,, Andrews-Pfannkoch, C.,, Denisova, E. A.,, Young, L.,, Qi, Z. -Q.,, Segall-Shapiro, T. H.,, Calvey, C. H.,, Parmar, P. P.,, Hutchison, C. A.,, Smith, H. O., and Venter, J. C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. ’, Science, 329:5987, pp. 52–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kac, E.. ( 2017;), ‘ What bio art is: A manifesto. ’, KAC, http://www.ekac.org/manifesto_whatbioartis.html. Accessed 19 April 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Landecker, H.. ( 2009), Culturing Life: How Cells became Technologies, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, J., and Wang, F.. ( 2018;), ‘ Gene-edited baby by Chinese scientist: The opener of the Pandora’s box. ’, Science Insights, 2018:13, pp. 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitrović, I.. ( 2015;), ‘ Introduction to speculative design practice. ’, Speculative, http://speculative.hr/en/introduction-to-speculative-design-practice/. Accessed 19 April 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Stein, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ DNA “printing” a big boon to research, but some raise concerns. ’, NPR, 7 May, https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/05/07/404460240/dna-printing-a-big-boon-to-research-but-some-raise-concerns. Accessed 22 April 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Thacker, E.. ( 2004), Biomedia, Electronic Mediations, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Tucker, A.,, Zelov, R., and Young, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Four years along: Emerging traits of programs in the NATSAP Practice Research Network (PRN). ’, Journal of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, 5, pp. 10–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. van Mensvoort, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Bistro In Vitro: A virtual playground to ponder the future of meat. ’, NPR, 15 May, https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/05/15/406725711/bistro-in-vitro-a-virtual-playground-to-ponder-the-future-of-meat. Accessed 20 April 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, Y.,, Ptacin, J. L.,, Fischer, E. C.,, Aerni, H. R.,, Caffaro, C. E.,, San Jose, K.,, Feldman, A. W.,, Turner, C. R., and Romesberg, F. E.. ( 2017;), ‘ A semi-synthetic organism that stores and retrieves increased genetic information. ’, Nature, 551, p. 644.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou, X.,, Ren, L.,, Li, Y.,, Zhang, M.,, Yu, Y., and Yu, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ The next-generation sequencing technology: A technology review and future perspective. ’, Science China Life Sciences, 53:1, pp. 44–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cong, Frank. ( 2020;), ‘ An alternative future of digitized genetic information and digital procreation. ’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 18:1, pp. 41–58, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00025_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00025_1
Loading
An alternative future of digitized genetic information and digital procreation
Technoetic Arts 18, 41 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00025_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00025_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00025_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): bio-privacy; biotechnology; digital procreation; ELSI; speculative design; technoetic arts

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error