Presence, absence, distance and intimacy: How do virtual classical music concerts rate against the wonders of the musical metaverse? | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Virtual Creativity
  4. Volume 13, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2397-9704
  • E-ISSN: 2397-9712

Abstract

Disruptions to live performance caused by the recent pandemic have fuelled a surge in virtual concerts, impacting both classical and popular music. This article explores ways in which audio-visual media have been used during the pandemic to maintain the live performance of classical music, through comparison with recent examples of virtual creativity in popular music (including performances by virtual artists in virtual spaces, Vocaloid and holographic concerts). Insights into audience experience are revealed: the benefits of engaging with music performance through online platforms include opportunities for social interaction, agency and an enhanced sense of community. Yet this participatory approach challenges the attentive listening mode embedded in the long-held conceptualization of classical music, and the new modes of performance and communication challenge established beliefs about the superiority of live performance over recording. Opportunities for creativity and audience experience and development are found in the notions of distributed creativity, distributed listening and the democratization of culture that are embedded in many of the practices of virtual music concerts. Analysing scholarly literature, music criticism, commentary and selected case studies, the article explores these ideas and opportunities through four episodes entitled to capture prominent themes: presence, absence and distance, intimacy and wonder.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00073_1
2024-03-22
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 21st Century Consort (2022), ‘Performance archive’, http://www.21stcenturyconsort.org/index.php/archive. Accessed 19 October 2022.
  2. Andrews, Robert (2006), ‘Second Life rocks (literally)’, Wired, 15 August, https://www.wired.com/2006/08/second-life-rocks-literally/. Accessed 21 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. (2008), ‘Bands hit global stage in Second Life’, Sydney Morning Herald, 11 April, https://www.smh.com.au/technology/bands-hit-global-stage-in-second-life-20080411-gds94o.html. Accessed 2 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baume, Matt (2021), ‘I am furious about how much I enjoyed Justin Bieber’s metaverse concert’, The Stranger, 19 November, https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2021/11/19/62960849/i-am-furious-about-how-much-i-enjoyed-justin-biebers-metaverse-concert. Accessed 26 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin, Walter ([1935] 1969), ‘The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction’, in H. Arendt (ed.), H. Zohn (trans.), Illuminations, New York: Schocken Books, pp. 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brodeur, Michael (2020a), ‘As the novelty of Zoom wears off, classical music reluctantly embraces its new virtual reality’, Washington Post, 31 October, https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/classical-music-covid-video-performances/2020/10/29/4fd2bb9a-153f-11eb-ba42-ec6a580836ed_story.html. Accessed 26 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brodeur, Michael (2020b), ‘In a time of uncertainty, classical music provides a sense of permanence’, Washington Post, 31 March, https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/in-a-time-of-uncertainty-classical-music-provides-a-sense-of-permanence/2020/03/31/c0036e98-7222-11ea-a9bd-9f8b593300d0_story.html. Accessed 19 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Irene (2017), ‘Wonder on tour’, in C. Mieves and I. Brown (eds), Wonder in Contemporary Artistic Practice, London: Routledge, pp. 153–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brusila, Johannes, Cloonan, Martin and Ramstedt, Kim (2022), ‘Music, digitalization, and democracy’, Popular Music and Society, 45:1, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Çamcı, Anıl and Hamilton, Rob (2020), ‘Audio-first VR: New perspectives on musical experiences in virtual environments’, Journal of New Music Research, 49:1, pp. 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Carr, Graham (2006), ‘Visualizing “the sound of genius”: Glenn Gould and the culture of celebrity in the 1950s’, Journal of Canadian Studies, 40:3, pp. 5–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen, Susanna and Ginsborg, Jane (2021), ‘The experiences of mid-career and seasoned orchestral musicians in the UK during the first COVID-19 lockdown’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645967.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Convery, Stephanie (2020), ‘Coronavirus: Could livesteaming be the answer to the arts industry’s freefall?’, The Guardian, 17 March, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/mar/17/melbourne-symphony-orchestras-livestream-solace-and-community-in-an-anxious-time. Accessed 26 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dammann, Guy (2007), ‘Concerts in Second Life aren’t quite the real deal’, The Guardian, 17 September, https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2007/sep/17/secondlife. Accessed 21 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Devenish, Louise, Sun, Cecilia, Hope, Cat and Tomlinson, Vanessa (2020), ‘Teaching tertiary music in the #MeToo era’, Tempo, 74:292, pp. 30–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Drott, Eric (2011), ‘Contemporary music, animation, and cultural democratization’, in Cultural Politics and Political Culture in France, 1968–1981, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 203–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Erauw, Willem (1998), ‘Canon formation: Some more reflections on Lydia Goehr’s imaginary museum of musical works’, Acta Musicologica, 70:2, pp. 109–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Felnhofer, Anna and Kothgassner, Oswald D. (2014), ‘Does gender matter? Exploring experiences of physical and social presence in men and women’, in Interacting with Presence: HCI and the Sense of Presence in Computer-Mediated Environments, Warsaw: De Gruyter Open Poland, pp. 152–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Goehr, Lydia (1989), ‘Being true to the work’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 47:1, pp. 55–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayles, Katherine (2007), ‘Hyper and deep attention: The generational divide in cognitive modes’, Profession, 2007, pp. 187–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Heath, Nicola (2022), ‘Alt-right groups are targeting young video gamers – and finding a culture where extremist views can flourish’, ABC News, 12 July, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-07-15/alt-right-groups-video-games-radicalising-young-men-extremism/101212494. Accessed 5 October 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Heshmat, Shahram (2018), ‘Why are we moved by music? Understanding our emotional responses to songs, lyrics, and chords’, Psychology Today, 24 July, https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/science-choice/201807/why-are-we-moved-music#:~:text=Music%20often%20makes%20us%20feel,greatness%20(Emmons%2C%202009). Accessed 2 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Marshmello (2019), ‘Marshmello holds first ever Fortnite concert live at Pleasant Park’, YouTube, https://youtu.be/NBsCzN-jfvA. Accessed 7 September 2022.
  24. McGlynn, Declan (2022), ‘Music and the metaverse: Are we on the brink of a virtual artist revolution?’, Rolling Stone UK, 7 April, https://www.rollingstone.co.uk/music/music-metaverse-are-we-on-brink-virtual-artist-revolution-14437/. Accessed 23 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Meaves, Christian and Brown, Irene (eds) (2017), Wonder in Contemporary Artistic Practice, New York and London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Michaud, Alyssa (2022), ‘Locating liveness in holographic performances: Technological anxiety and participatory fandom at Vocaloid concerts’, Popular Music, 41:1, pp. 1–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Miku, Hatsune (2013), ‘[Hatsune Miku] World is mine/ryo (supercell)’, YouTube, https://youtu.be/jhl5afLEKdo. Accessed 7 September 2022.
  28. Miller, Nick (2021), ‘They saved classical music in Melbourne: Now they’re going national’, Sydney Morning Herald, 17 November, https://www.smh.com.au/culture/music/they-saved-classical-music-in-melbourne-now-they-re-going-national-20211117-p599pf.html. Accessed 7 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Milligan, Kate (2019), ‘Identity and the abstract self in Cat Hope’s Speechless’, Tempo, 73: 290, pp. 13–24, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0040298219000548.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Nguyen, Hang Thi Tuyet (2018), ‘Audiences’ engagement with Twitter and Facebook Live during classical music performances: Community and connectivity through live listening experiences’, Ph.D. thesis, Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Onderdijk, Kelsey, Swarbrick, Dana, Van Kerrebroeck, Bavo, Mentei, Maximillian, Vuoskoski, Joanna K., Maes, Pieter-Jan and Leman, Marc (2021), ‘Livestream experiments: The role of COVID-19, agency, presence, and social context in facilitating social connectedness’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647929.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Pearsall, Judy and Trumble, Bill (eds) (1996), The Oxford English Reference Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Pitts, Stephanie (2017), ‘Shaping live listening experiences in classical music’, in M. Reason and A. Lindelof (eds), Experiencing Liveness in Contemporary Performance: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Reason, Matthew and Lindelof, Anja (2017), ‘Introduction’, in M. Reason and A. Lindelof (eds), Experiencing Liveness in Contemporary Performance: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Riva, Giuseppe, Waterworth, John and Murray, Dianne (2014), ‘Introduction’, in Interacting with Presence: HCI and the Sense of Presence in Computer-Mediated Environments, Warsaw: De Gruyter Open Poland, pp. 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanden, Paul (2012), ‘Virtual liveness and sounding cyborgs: John Oswald’s “Vane”’, Popular Music, 31:1, pp. 45–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Savage, Patrick, Loui, Psyche, Tarr, Bronwyn, Schachner, Adena, Glowacki, Luke, Mithen, Steven and Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2020), ‘Music as a coevolved system for social bonding’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44:e59, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20000333.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sawyer, R. Keith and DeZutter, Stacy (2009), ‘Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration’, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3:2, pp. 81–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Schroeder, Franziska and Lucas, Alex (2021), ‘Distributed participatory design: The challenges of designing with physically disabled musicians during a global pandemic’, Organised Sound, 26:2, pp. 219–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Scott, Travis (2020), ‘Travis Scott and Fortnite present: Astronomical (full event video)’, YouTube, https://youtu.be/wYeFAlVC8qU. Accessed 7 September 2022.
  41. Shafran, Tiffany (2017), ‘Archives of wonder: Collecting the liminal in contemporary art’, in C. Meaves and I. Brown (eds), Wonder in Contemporary Artistic Practice, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 19–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Shepherd, John and Devine, Kyle (2013), ‘Sociology of music (USA)’, Grove Music Online, online first, https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.A2242526.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Spacedout (2020), ‘21st Century Consort Spacedout’, YouTube, https://youtu.be/AYjZZpWVFiA. Accessed 7 September 2022.
  44. Swarbrick, Dana, Seibt, Beate, Grinspun, Noemi and Vuoskoski, Jonna (2021), ‘Corona concerts: The effect of virtual concert characteristics on social connection and Kama Muta’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, p. 648448.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Tarr, Bronwyn, Launay, Jacques and Dunbar, Robin I. M. (2016), ‘Silent disco: Dancing in synchrony leads to elevated pain thresholds and social closeness’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 37:5, pp. 343–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ward, Joanna (2020), ‘Decentring and dismantling: A critical and radical approach to diversity in tertiary music education’, Tempo, 74:294, pp. 65–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Waterston, Michael L. (2011), ‘The techno-brain: How does the human mind respond physiologically to our interruption-rich world?’, Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 35:2, pp. 77–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Wave (2024), ‘Justin Bieber: An interactive virtual experience’, https://live.thewaves.network/justin-bieber/index.html. Accessed 15 January 2024.
  49. Way, Tony (2020), ‘Live music in a hauntingly empty Hamer Hall promises good things to come’, Sydney Morning Herald, 26 November, https://www.smh.com.au/culture/music/live-music-in-a-hauntingly-empty-hamer-hall-promises-good-things-to-come-20201126-p56i6f.html. Accessed 27 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Way, Tony (2021), ‘Resilience and ingenuity creates a lifeline for local artists’, Sydney Morning Herald, 28 December, https://www.smh.com.au/culture/music/concert-hall-gems-amid-chaos-of-the-pandemic-20211224-p59k0s.html. Accessed 26 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00073_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): audience experience; democratization of culture; distributed creativity; hybridity; mediated presence; post-digital; virtual concerts

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error