Inclusive virtual simulation space: Digital technologies and design thinking process | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Virtual Creativity
  4. Volume 13, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2397-9704
  • E-ISSN: 2397-9712

Abstract

This article demonstrates a case study in research-creation based on the extended reality (XR) placemaking initiative, and reports on the development of two iterations that are part of a digital technologies (DT) project. Various studies with a focus on restorative and relaxation applications have shown positive findings in improving mental wellness and self-awareness. We speculate that combining physical activity and exposure to digital nature can provide additional health benefits compared to restorative activities alone. The first iteration, Mind Space XR, is a virtual reality (VR) project that has the initial goal of supporting users to experience emotion-focused skills training based on mindfulness, emotion regulation and compassion in a low-risk environment. In this iteration of the DT project, we have focused on interaction design aspects and the research-creation process required to develop the information architecture framework of an early prototype. This ongoing research then informs the development of a second iteration, the ‘inclusive virtual simulation space’ – a VR learning simulation initiative that supports users to experience customizable content in an inclusive environment. Combining Australian Curriculum areas from DT and the humanities and social sciences, this study will experiment with the human–computer interaction process with the goal of configuring a modular high-fidelity virtual environment to achieve perceived ease of use by user groups including creators, educators and students. This will lead to a proof-of-concept platform with the flexibility to integrate digital content that permits the co-creation of digital prototypes driven by inclusive virtual and physical placemaking and simulation learning. This educational inclusive virtual simulation project focuses on experimenting with and introducing education technology and XR skills and knowledge to educators and creators, which is broadly applicable to education-based DT contexts.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00074_1
2024-03-22
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amin, M. (2019), ‘The benefit of designing for everyone’, report prepared by PwC Australia, http://centreforinclusivedesign.org/media/1186/inclusive-design-report-digital-160519.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2024.
  2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2022a), ‘Australian Curriculum: Technologies F-10 version 9.0. About the learning area’, https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/content/dam/en/curriculum/ac-version-9/downloads/technologies/digital-technologies/technologies-about-the-learning-area-f-10-v9.docx. Accessed 1 September 2022.
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2022b), ‘Australian Curriculum: Technologies F-10 version 9.0. Scope and sequence’, https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/content/dam/en/curriculum/ac-version-9/downloads/technologies/digital-technologies/technologies-digital-technologies-scope-and-sequence-f-10-v9.docx. Accessed 1 September 2022.
  4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2022c), ‘Personal and social capability (version 8.4)’, https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/personal-and-social-capability/. Accessed 1 September 2022.
  5. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2022d), ‘Understand this general capability: Personal and social capability (version 9)’, https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/teacher-resources/understand-this-general-capability/personal-and-social-capability#accordion-1622e32e40-item-5b712736df. Accessed 1 September 2022.
  6. Blum, J., Rockstroh, C. and Göritz, A. S. (2019), ‘Heart rate variability biofeedback based on slow-paced breathing with immersive virtual reality nature scenery’, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, p. 2172, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02172.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Blythe, J., Baird, J., Bennett, N., Dale, G., Nash, K. L., Pickering, G. and Wabnitz, C. C. C. (2021), ‘Fostering ocean empathy through future scenarios’, People and Nature, 3:6, pp. 1284–96, https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10253.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Calogiuri, G., Litleskare, S., Fagerheim, K. A., Rydgren, T. L., Brambilla, E. and Thurston, M. (2018), ‘Experiencing nature through immersive virtual environments: Environmental perceptions, physical engagement, and affective responses during a simulated nature walk’, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, p. 2321, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02321.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Candy, L. (2006), ‘Practice-based research: A guide’, CCS report: 2006-V1.0, Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Colby, R. and Colby, R. S. (2019), ‘Game design documentation: Four perspectives from independent game studios’, Communication Design Quarterly, 7:3, pp. 5–15, https://doi.org/10.1145/3321388.3321389.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dam, R. F. and Teo, Y. S. (2020), ‘Stage 2 in the design thinking process: Define the problem and interpret the results’, Interaction Design Foundation, 22 Novmeber, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/stage-2-in-the-design-thinking-process-define-the-problem-and-interpret-the-results. Accessed 1 September 2022.
  12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989), ‘User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models’, Management Science, 35:8, pp. 982–1003.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dey, A., Billinghurst, M., Lindeman, R. W. and Swan II, J. E. (2018), ‘A systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014’, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Domingo, J. R. and Bradley, E. G. (2018), ‘Education student perceptions of virtual reality as a learning tool’, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46:3, pp. 329–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gray, C. and Malins, J. (2004), Visualizing Research: A Guide to the Research Process in Art and Design, Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Guillén, V., Baños, R. M. and Botella, C. (2018), ‘Users’ opinion about a virtual reality system as an adjunct to psychological treatment for stress-related disorders: A quantitative and qualitative mixed-methods study’, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, p. 1038, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01038.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hodent, C. (2017), The Gamer’s Brain: How Neuroscience & UX Can Impact Video Game Design, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Horst, R. and Dorner, R. (2018), ‘Opportunities for virtual and mixed reality knowledge demonstration’, in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), Munich, Germany, 16–20 October, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 381–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Järvinen, A. (2007), ‘Introducing applied ludology: Hands-on methods for game studies, situated play’, in Proceedings of the 2007 DIGRA International Conference: Situated Play, Tokyo, Japan, 24–28 September, Digital Games Research Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Malliet, S. (2007), ‘Adapting the principles of ludology to the method of video game content analysis’, Game Studies, 7:1, https://gamestudies.org/7010701/articles/malliet. Accessed 9 February 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Marais, C., Futcher, L. A. and Niekerk, J. V. (2014), ‘Incorporating a game design document into game development projects deliverables’, SACLA: ICT Education in the Cyber World 2014, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 25–26 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Marsh, T. and Costello, B. M. (2012), ‘Experience in serious games: Between positive and serious experience’, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Serious Games Development and Applications, Bremen, Germany, 26–29 September, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 255–67, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33687-4_22.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Marshmallow Laser Feast-Focus (n.d.), ‘We live in an ocean of air’, https://fabbula.com/artists/we-live-in-an-ocean-of-air-by-marshmallow-laser-feast/. Accessed 12 July 2023.
  24. Michael, D. R. and Chen, S. L. (2005), Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform, Florence, KY: Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mishra, P. and Koehler, M. J. (2006), ‘Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge’, Teachers College Record, 108:6, pp. 1017–54, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Morie, J. F. (2007), ‘Performing in (virtual) spaces: Embodiment and being in virtual environments’, International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 3:2–3, pp. 123–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. New Reality Co. (n.d.), ‘Tree VR’, https://www.treeofficial.com. Accessed 12 July 2023.
  28. NSW Government (2019), ‘Everyone can play: A guideline to create inclusive playspaces’, https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/-/media/Files/DPE/Guidelines/everyone-can-play-guideline-2019-02-20.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2019.
  29. Roche, K., Liu, S. and Siegel, S. (2019), ‘The effects of virtual reality on mental wellness: A literature review’, Mental Health in Family Medicine, 14, pp. 811–18, https://www.kosmospublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The-Effects-of-Virtual-Reality-on-Mental-Wellness-A-Literature-Review.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Rose, V., Stewart, I., Jenkins, K. G., Ang, C. S. and Matsangidou, M. (2018), ‘A scoping review exploring the feasibility of virtual reality technology use with individuals living with dementia’, in ICAT-EGVE 2018: International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence and Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments, Limassol, Cyprus, 7–9 November, Goslar: Eurographics Digital Library, https://diglib.eg.org/handle/10.2312/egve20181325. Accessed 1 June 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Sansom, M. and See, Z. S. (2021), ‘Translating performative mediated art into virtual reality: A case study’, Virtual Creativity, 11:1, pp. 53–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Sherman, W. R. and Craig, A. B. (2003), Understanding Virtual Reality, Cambridge, MA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers and Elsevier Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Sobel, D. (2004), ‘Place-based education: Connecting classroom and community’, Nature and Listening, 4:1, pp. 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Valtchanov, D., Barton, K. R. and Ellard, C. (2010), ‘Restorative effects of virtual nature settings’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13:5, pp. 503–12, https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0308.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Wevr (n.d.), ‘theBlu: Experience the wonder and majesty of the ocean and come face to face with the most awe inspiring species on the planet’, https://wevr.com/theblu. Accessed 12 July 2023.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00074_1
Loading
Inclusive virtual simulation space: Digital technologies and design thinking process
Virtual Creativity 13, 49 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/vcr_00074_1
/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00074_1
/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00074_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): design thinking; digital technologies; education technology; human–computer interaction; inclusive design; simulation learning; transdisciplinary; virtual reality

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error