Gender context matters: The hidden gender equality problem of school democracy

References

1. Almgren, E. (2006), Att fostra demokrater: Om skolan i demokratin och demokratin i skolan (‘Educating democrats: About the school in democracy and democracy in school’), Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Amadeo, J.-A., Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Husfeldt, V. and Nikolova, R. (2002), Civic Knowledge and Engagement: An IEA Study of Upper Secondary Students in Sixteen Countries, Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Amnå, E., Ekman, T. and Almgren, E. (2007), ‘The end of a distinct model of democracy? Country-diverse orientations among young adult Scandinavians’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 30:1, pp. 61–86.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arnesen, A.-L., Lahelma, E. and Öhrn, E. (2008), ‘Travelling discourses on gender and education: The case of boys underachievement’, Nordic Studies in Education, 28:1, pp. 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brambor, T., Roberts Clarc, W. and Golder, M. (2006), ‘Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyzes’, Political Analysis, 14:1, pp. 63–82.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Calvin, C. M., Fernandes, C., Smith, P., Visscher, P. M. and Deary, I. J. (2010), ‘Sex, intelligence and educational achievement in a national cohort of over 175,000 11-year-old schoolchildren in England’, Intelligence, 38:4, pp. 424–32.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Campbell, D. E. (2008), ‘Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents’, Political Behavior, 30:4, pp. 437–54.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Campbell, D. E. (2019), ‘What social scientists have learned about civic education: A review of the literature’, Peabody Journal of Education, 94:1, pp. 32–47.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dobbins, M. and Busemeyer, M. R. (2015), ‘Socio-economic institutions, organized interests and partisan politics: The development of vocational education in Denmark and Sweden’, Socio-Economic Review, 13:2, pp. 259–84.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dolan, K. and Lawless, J. L. (2021), ‘The importance of political science for understanding the developmental roots of gender gaps in politics’, Psychological Inquiry, 32:2, pp. 83–88.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dovemark, M. and Holm, A.-S. (2017), ‘Pedagogic identities for sale! Segregation and homogenization in Swedish upper secondary school’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38:4, pp. 518–32.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dryler, H. (1999), ‘The impact of school and classroom characteristics on educational choices by boys and girls: A multilevel analysis’, Acta Sociologica, 42:4, pp. 299–318.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ekman, T. (2007), ‘Demokratisk kompetens: Om gymnasiet som demokratiskola’ (‘Democratic competence: About the upper secondary school as a democratic school’), doctoral thesis, Gothenburg: Gotheburg University, https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/7455. Accessed 15 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Francis, B. (2000), ‘The gendered subject: Student’s subject preferences and discussion of gender and subject ability’, Oxford Review of Education, 26:1, pp. 35–48.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hakvoort, I. and Olsson, E. (2014), ‘The school’s democratic mission and conflict resolution: Voices of Swedish educators’, Curriculum Inquiry, 44:4, pp. 531–51.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harker, R. (2000), ‘Achievement, gender and the single-sex/coed debate’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21:2, pp. 203–18.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hattie, J. (2008), Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, London and New York: Routlegde.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hills, L. A. and Croston, A. (2012), ‘“It should be better all together”: Exploring strategies for  “undoing” gender in coeducational physical education’, Sport, Education and Society, 17:5, pp. 591–605.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Huyge, E., van Maele, D. and van Houtte, M. (2015), ‘Does students’ machismo fit in school? Clarifying the implications of traditional gender role ideology for school belonging’, Gender and Education, 27:1, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.972921.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jormfeldt, J. (2011), ‘Skoldemokratins fördolda jämställdhetsproblem: Eleverfarenheter i en könssegregerad gymnasieskola’ (‘The hidden gender equality problem of school democracy: Student experiences in a gender segregated upper secondary school’), doctoral thesis, Växjö: Linnaeus University, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A383267&dswid=-7824. Accessed 15 July 2022.
21. Kimmel, M. (2010), Boys and School: A Background Paper on the ‘Boys Crisis’, Swedish Government Official Reports, SOU 2010:53, Stockholm: Fritzes, https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2010/07/sou-201053/. Accessed 15 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Knowles, R. T., Torney-Purta, J. and Barber, C. (2018), ‘Enhancing citizenship learning with international comparative research: Analyses of IEA civic education datasets’, Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 13:1, pp. 7–30.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kutnick, P. (2000), ‘Girls, boys and school achievement. Critical comments on who achieves in schools and under what economic and social conditions achievement takes place: A Caribbean perspective’, International Journal of Educational Development, 20:1, pp. 65–84.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lahelma, E. (2005), ‘School grades and other resources: The “failing boys” discourse revisited’, Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 13:2, pp. 78–89.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lorentzen, T. and Vogt, K. C. (2022), ‘Gendered transition structures: Life course patterns after completion of gender-segregated vocational education in Norway’, Journal of Education and Work, 35:1, pp. 64–77.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Luke, D. A. (2004), Multilevel Modelling, Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage University Papers.
    [Google Scholar]
27. OECD (2015), The ABC of Gender Equality in Education: Aptitude, Behaviour, Confidence, PISA, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Risman, B. J. and Davis, G. (2013), ‘From sex roles to gender structure’, Current Sociology Review, 61:5&6, pp. 733–55.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D. and Losito, B. (2010), Initial Findings from the IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study, Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED512412. Accessed 15 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sikora, J. (2014), ‘Gender gap in school science: Are single-sex schools important?’, Sex Roles, 70:9&10, pp. 400–15.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Steenbergen, M. R. and Jones, B. S. (2002), ‘Modeling multilevel data structures’, American Journal of Political Science, 46:1, pp. 218–37.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Swedish Code of Statues (2008), SFS 2008:567, Diskrimineringslagen (‘Discrimination law’), https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/diskrimineringslag-2008567_sfs-2008-567. Accessed 15 July 2022.
33. Swedish Code of Statues (2010), SFS 2010:800, Skollagen (‘School law’), https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800. Accessed 15 July 2022.
34. Swedish Government Official Reports (2004), SOU 2004:43, Den könsuppdelade arbetsmarknaden (‘The gender-divided labour market’), Stockholm: Statsrådsberedningen, https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2004/04/sou-200443/. Accessed 15 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Swedish National Agency for Education (2003), Ung i demokratin: Gymnasieelevers kunskaper och attityder i demokrati- och samhällsfrågor (‘Youth in democracy: Upper secondary school students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding issues relating to democracy and society’), Skolverkets rapport nr 232, Stockholm: Skolverket.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Swedish National Agency for Education (2006), Könsskillnader i skolprestationer och utbildningsval (‘Gender differences in school achievements and educational choices’), Skolverkets rapport nr 287, Stockholm: Skolverket.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Swedish National Agency for Education (2011), Läroplan, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen för gymnasieskola 2011 (‘Curriculum for upper secondary school’), Stockholm: Fritzes, https://www.skolverket.se/undervisning/gymnasieskolan/laroplan-program-och-amnen-i-gymnasieskolan/laroplan-gy11-for-gymnasieskolan. Accessed 15 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Swedish Schools Inspectorate (2012), Skolinspektionen (‘Schools’ work with democracy and fundamental values: Quality assessment report’), translated version of report no 2012:9, https://www.skolinspektionen.se/globalassets/02-beslut-rapporter-stat/granskningsrapporter/tkg/2012/demokrati/quality-assessment-report-democracy-and-fundamental-values.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H. and Schulz, W. (2001), Citizenship and Education in Twenty-Eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen, Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED452116. Accessed 15 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Torney-Purta, J. (2002), ‘The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries’, Applied Development Science, 6:4, pp. 203–12.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Torney-Purta, J. and Amadeo, J.-A. (2003), ‘A cross-national analysis of political and civic involvement among adolescents’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 36:2, pp. 269–74.
    [Google Scholar]
42. van Houtte, M. (2004a), ‘Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture’, Educational Studies, 30:2, pp. 159–73.
    [Google Scholar]
43. van Houtte, M. (2004b), ‘Gender context of the school and study culture, or how the presence of girls affects the achievement of boys’, Educational Studies, 30:4, pp. 409–23.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wong, K.-C., Lam, Y. R. and Ho, L.-M. (2002), ‘The effects of schooling on gender differences’, British Educational Journal, 28:6, pp. 827–43.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Young, I. M. (1997), ‘Difference as a resource for democratic communication’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 383–406.
    [Google Scholar]