Design-led innovation for more plant-based food: An interdisciplinary approach to more consumer-centric product development | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Food Design
  4. Volume 9, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2056-6522
  • E-ISSN: 2056-6530
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

A more plant-based diet will contribute to food sustainability. Achieving this change requires collaboration across disciplines which is not easy to achieve. This article illustrates how interdisciplinary collaboration in a large research project can be facilitated through a design-led innovation process juxtaposing approaches from design and science. Consumer insights were used in creative workshops to ideate and develop packaging and product concepts for plant-based food focusing on ‘environment’, ‘health’ and ‘Norwegian’ design imperatives. Learning loops of alignment – creation – feedback were applied to design and test six packaging prototypes of two product categories (Pea Porridge, Faba Bean Drink). Qualitative feedback was collected from 147 consumers and a quantitative survey with 1102 Norwegian consumers tested product expected liking and product-concept match. Younger consumers and users of plant-based products exhibited a higher expected liking vs. non-users and older respondents. Packaging design adopted for specific consumer segments can positively contribute to a shift to more plant-based diets. We show how a dynamic interdisciplinary innovation approach can be powerful to creating new product ideas, getting consumers’ input and fostering collaboration and learning among disciplines. We offer other researchers and the food industry actionable opportunity areas and design imperatives for their innovation activities around plant-based food.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Norwegian Research Council (Award 267858)
  • PrecisionFoodProduction (Award 314111)
  • FoodForFuture (Award 314318)
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Intellect Ltd.
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC), which allows users to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the article, as long as the author is attributed and the article is not used for commercial purposes. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00057_1
2023-04-20
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijfd/9/1/ijfd.9.1.101_Gonera.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00057_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abrahamsen, U., Uhlen, A. K., Waalen, W. and Stabbetorp, H. (2019), ‘Muligheter for økt proteinproduksjon på kornarealene’, in E. Strand (ed.), Jord-og Plantekultur 2019: Forsøk i korn, olje-og proteinvekster, engfrøavl og potet 2018, Ås: NIBIO, pp. 160–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguirre, M., Agudelo, N. and Romm, J. (2017), ‘Design facilitation as emerging practice: Analyzing how designers support multi-stakeholder co-creation’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3:3, pp. 198–209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.11.003.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alandia, G., Pulvento, C., Sellami, M., Hoidal, N., Anemone, T., Nigussie, E., Agüero, J., Lavini, A. and Jacobsen, S.-E. (2020), ‘Grain legumes may enhance high-quality food production in Europe’, in A. Hirich, R. Choukr-Allah and R. Ragab (eds), Emerging Research in Alternative Crops, New York: Springer, pp. 25–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aschemann-Witzel, J., Varela, P. and Peschel, A. O. (2019), ‘Consumers’ categorization of food ingredients: Do consumers perceive them as “clean label” producers expect? An exploration with projective mapping’, Food Quality and Preference, 71, pp. 117–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Asioli, D., Varela, P., Hersleth, M., Almli, V. L., Olsen, N. V. and Naes, T. (2017), ‘A discussion of recent methodologies for combining sensory and extrinsic product properties in consumer studies’, Food Quality and Preference, 56, pp. 266–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Atkins, L. and Michie, S. (2013), ‘Changing eating behaviour: What can we learn from behavioural science?’, Nutrition Bulletin, 38:1, pp. 30–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beacom, E., Bogue, J. and Repar, L. (2021), ‘Market-oriented development of plant-based food and beverage products: A usage segmentation approach’, Journal of Food Products Marketing, 27:4, pp. 204–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Beckman, S., Fletcher, A. and Martin, R. S. (2021), ‘Integrating consumer food experience with health and sustainability outcomes: The critical role of design imperatives’, in W. Batat (ed.), Design Thinking for Food Well-Being, Cham: Springer, pp. 195–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Ben Mahmoud-Jouini, S., Midler, C. and Silberzahn, P. (2016), ‘Contributions of design thinking to project management in an innovation context’, Project Management Journal, 47:2, pp. 144–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bobbe, T., Krzywinski, J. and Woelfel, C. (2016), ‘A comparison of design process models from academic theory and professional practice’, in D. Marjanović, M. Štorga, N. Pavković, N. Bojčetić and S. Škec (eds), DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, 16–19 May, Glasgow: The Design Society, pp. 1205–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Boer, J., De Witt, A. and Aiking, H. (2016), ‘Help the climate, change your diet: A cross-sectional study on how to involve consumers in a transition to a low-carbon society’, Appetite, 98, pp. 19–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Borrego, M. and Cutler, S. (2010), ‘Constructive alignment of interdisciplinary graduate curriculum in engineering and science: An analysis of successful IGERT proposals’, Journal of Engineering Education, 99:4, pp. 355–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2012), ‘Thematic analysis’, in H. Cooper (ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, vol. 2, Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association, pp. 57–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. British Design Council (2019), ‘Double diamond: What is the framework for innovation?’, https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond. Accessed 4 September 2022.
  15. Brown, T. and Katz, B. (2011), ‘Change by design’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28:3, pp. 381–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bublitz, M. G. and Peracchio, L. A. (2015), ‘Applying industry practices to promote healthy foods: An exploration of positive marketing outcomes’, Journal of Business Research, 68:12, pp. 2484–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Buchanan, R. (2001), ‘Design research and the new learning’, Design Issues, 17:4, pp. 3–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bugge, A. and Alfnes, F. (2018), ‘Kjøttfrie spisevaner: hva tenker forbrukerne?’ (‘Meatless eating habits: Consumers’ view’) (trans. A. Gonera), 5 November, https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12199/5355/OR%2014%20-%202018%20Kj%c3%83%c2%b8ttfrie%20spisevaner%20.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 5 September 2022.
  19. Capjon, J. (2004), ‘Trial-and-error-based innovation: Catalysing shared engagement in design conceptualisation’, Ph.D. thesis, Oslo: Arkitekthøgskolen Oslo.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Capjon, J. (2005), ‘Engaged collaborative ideation supported through material catalysation’, NORDES: Nordic Design Research, 1, https://archive.nordes.org/index.php/n13/article/view/231. Accessed 17 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Clarkson, J. and Eckert, C. (eds) (2010), Design Process Improvement: A Review of Current Practice, London: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Corrin, T. and Papadopoulos, A. (2017), ‘Understanding the attitudes and perceptions of vegetarian and plant-based diets to shape future health promotion programs’, Appetite, 109, pp. 40–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Curedale, R. (2019), Design Thinking Process & Methods, 5th ed., Los Angeles, CA: Design Community College.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Graebner, M. E. (2007), ‘Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges’, Academy of Management Journal, 50:1, pp. 25–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fanzo, J., Covic, N., Dobermann, A., Henson, S., Herrero, M., Pingali, P. and Staal, S. (2020), ‘A research vision for food systems in the 2020s: Defying the status quo’, Global Food Security, 26, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100397.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fawcett, J. (2013), ‘Thoughts about multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research’, Nursing Science Quarterly, 26:4, pp. 376–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Fenko, A. and van Rompay, T. J. (2018), ‘Consumer-driven product design’, in G. Ares and P. Varela (eds), Methods in Consumer Research, vol. 2, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 427–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gilchrist, L., Cattaneo, M.-A. and Fenböck, M. (2020), ‘Food & beverages trends’, Ipsos, https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-11/food_and_beverage_trends_discover_ipsos_pov_nov2020.pdf. Accessed 5 September 2022.
  29. Gonera, A. and Milford, A. B. (2018), The Plant Protein Trend in Norway: Market Overview and Future Perspectives, Nofima Reoprt Series 25/2018, Tromsø: Nofima, https://nofima.brage.unit.no/nofima-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2564561/Rapport+25-2018.pdf?sequence=2. Accessed 6 March 2022.
  30. Gonera, A. and Pabst, R. (2019), ‘The use of design thinking in transdisciplinary research and innovation consortia: Challenges, enablers and benefits’, Journal of Innovation Management, 7:3, pp. 96–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Gonera, A., Svanes, E., Bugge, A. B., Hatlebakk, M. M., Prexl, K.-M. and Ueland, Ø. (2021), ‘Moving consumers along the innovation adoption curve: A new approach to accelerate the shift toward a more sustainable diet’, Sustainability, 13:8, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084477.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Graça, J., Oliveira, A. and Calheiros, M. M. (2015), ‘Meat, beyond the plate: Data-driven hypotheses for understanding consumer willingness to adopt a more plant-based diet’, Appetite, 90, pp. 80–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Grimsby, S. and Kure, C. F. (2019), ‘How open is food innovation? The crispbread case’, British Food Journal, 121:4, pp. 950–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Haas, R., Schnepps, A., Pichler, A. and Meixner, O. (2019), ‘Cow milk versus plant-based milk substitutes: A comparison of product image and motivational structure of consumption’, Sustainability, 11:18, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185046.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hielkema, M. H. and Lund, T. B. (2021), ‘Reducing meat consumption in meat-loving Denmark: Exploring willingness, behavior, barriers and drivers’, Food Quality and Preference, 93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104257.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hinrichs, C. C. (2014), ‘Transitions to sustainability: A change in thinking about food systems change?’, Agriculture and Human Values, 31:1, pp. 143–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hodges, P., Ruecker, S., Scaletsky, C., Rivera, J., Faller, R. and Geppert, A. (2017), ‘Four criteria for design theories’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3:1, pp. 65–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hölzle, K. and Rhinow, H. (2019), ‘The dilemmas of design thinking in innovation projects’, Project Management Journal, 50:4, pp. 418–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Jallinoja, P., Niva, M. and Latvala, T. (2016), ‘Future of sustainable eating? Examining the potential for expanding bean eating in a meat-eating culture’, Futures, 83, pp. 4–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S. and Uzzi, B. (2008), ‘Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science’, Science, 322:5905, pp. 1259–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kolko, J. (2010), ‘Abductive thinking and sensemaking: The drivers of design synthesis’, Design Issues, 26:1, pp. 15–28, https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kumar, V. and Whitney, P. (2007), ‘Daily life, not markets: Customer-centered design’, Journal of Business Strategy, 28:4, pp. 46–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kvakkestad, V., Berglann, H., Refsgaard, K. and Flaten, O. (2018), ‘Citizen and consumer evaluation of organic food and farming in Norway’, Organic Agriculture, 8:2, pp. 87–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Laursen, L. N. and Haase, L. M. (2019), ‘The shortcomings of design thinking when compared to designerly thinking’, The Design Journal, 22:6, pp. 813–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lemken, D., Spiller, A. and Schulze-Ehlers, B. (2019), ‘More room for legume: Consumer acceptance of meat substitution with classic, processed and meat-resembling legume products’, Appetite, 143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104412.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Liedtka, J. (2015), ‘Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32:6, pp. 925–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Lindeman, M. and Väänänen, M. (2000), ‘Measurement of ethical food choice motives’, Appetite, 34:1, pp. 55–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Linnemann, A. R., Benner, M., Verkerk, R. and van Boekel, M. A. (2006), ‘Consumer-driven food product development’, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 17:4, pp. 184–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Magnier, L. and Crié, D. (2015), ‘Communicating packaging eco-friendliness’, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43:4–5, pp. 350–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Mazzucato, M. (2018), ‘Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union: A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth’, European Commission, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/360325. Accessed 28 August 2022.
  51. Meinel, M., Eismann, T. T., Baccarella, C. V., Fixson, S. K. and Voigt, K. I. (2020), ‘Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study’, European Management Journal, 38:4, pp. 661–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Mejía, G. M., Nazir, C., Malina, R. F., Topete, A. G., Londoño, F. C., Roldán, A. F., Farias, P. L and Silveira, J. (2018), ‘An emerging role for design methods in transdisciplinary practice’, in Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Electronic Art (ISEA 2018), Durban, 23–30 June, Durban: Durban University of Technology, pp. 67–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Melendrez-Ruiz, J., Arvisenet, G., Laugel, V., Chambaron, S. and Monnery-Patris, S. (2020), ‘Do French consumers have the same social representations of pulses as food industry professionals?’, Foods, 9:2, https://www.doi.org/10.3390/foods9020147.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Melendrez-Ruiz, J., Buatois, Q., Chambaron, S., Monnery-Patris, S. and Arvisenet, G. (2019), ‘French consumers know the benefits of pulses, but do not choose them: An exploratory study combining indirect and direct approaches’, Appetite, 141, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.06.003.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M. and Beverland, M. B. (2019), ‘Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36:2, pp. 124–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Milford, A. B., Trandem, N. and Pires, A. J. G. (2021), ‘Fear of pesticide residues and preference for domestically produced strawberries’, Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 102:4, pp. 369–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Mosely, G., Markauskaite, L. and Wrigley, C. (2021), ‘Design facilitation: A critical review of conceptualisations and constructs’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100962.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Nilsen, L. B. (2021), ‘Erter’ (‘Peas’) (trans. A. Gonera), https://www.nibio.no/tema/mat/plantegenetiske-ressurser/nytteplanter-i-norge/hagebruksplanter/gronnsakssorter/erter. Accessed 7 June 2022.
  59. Nocella, G. and Kennedy, O. (2012), ‘Food health claims: What consumers understand’, Food Policy, 37:5, pp. 571–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Norman, D. A. (2010), ‘The research-practice gap: The need for translational developers’, Interactions, 17:4, pp. 9–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. O’Rourke, D. and Ringer, A. (2016), ‘The impact of sustainability information on consumer decision making’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20:4, pp. 882–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Olsen, N. V. (2015), ‘Design thinking and food innovation’, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 41:2, pp. 182–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Pabst, R., Tyrasa, I., Händschke, S., Siepmann, R. and Gonera, A. (2020), ‘Context is king: Facilitation in innovation projects: A comparison between academic and industry projects’, Journal of Innovation Management, 8:3, pp. 48–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Pohjolainen, P., Vinnari, M. and Jokinen, P. (2015), ‘Consumers’ perceived barriers to following a plant-based diet’, British Food Journal, 117:3, pp. 1150–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Prexl, K. M. and Gonera, A. (2020), Four Plausible Futures of Food: Navigating the Future for Sustainable and Healthy Plant-Based Protein in Norway: A Scenario Approach, Nofima Report Series 12/2020, Tromsø: Nofima, https://nofima.brage.unit.no/nofima-xmlui/handle/11250/2652109. Accessed 6 March 2023.
  66. Price, R., Wrigley, C. and Matthews, J. (2018), ‘Action researcher to design innovation catalyst: Building design capability from within’, Action Research, 19:2, pp. 318–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. R-Core Team (2020), ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing’, R Project, https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 1 June 2022.
  68. Reipurth, M. F., Hørby, L., Gregersen, C. G., Bonke, A. and Cueto, F. J. P. (2019), ‘Barriers and facilitators towards adopting a more plant-based diet in a sample of Danish consumers’, Food Quality and Preference, 73, pp. 288–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Resnick, M. and Ocko, S. (1990), LEGO/Logo-Learning Through and About Design, Cambridge, MA: Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT Media Laboratory.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Rogers, E. M. (2010), Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Simon and Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Rosenfeld, D. L. and Burrow, A. L. (2017), ‘Vegetarian on purpose: Understanding the motivations of plant-based dieters’, Appetite, 116, pp. 456–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Rothe, M. and Dunn, D. (2021), ‘How design thinking can influence food choices and healthy eating experiences among consumers’, in W. Batat (ed.), Design Thinking for Food Well-Being, Cham: Springer, pp. 35–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Sanders, E. B.-N. and Stappers, P. J. (2008), ‘Co-creation and the new landscapes of design’, Co-Design, 4:1, pp. 5–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Scarborough, P., Appleby, P. N., Mizdrak, A., Briggs, A. D. M., Travis, R. C., Bradbury, K. E. and Key, T. J. (2014), ‘Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK’, Climatic Change, 125:2, pp. 179–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Schiermeier, Q. (2019), ‘Eat less meat: UN climate-change report calls for change to human diet’, Nature, 572:7769, pp. 291–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Schifferstein, H. N. (2015), ‘Employing consumer research for creating new and engaging food experiences in a changing world’, Current Opinion in Food Science, 3, pp. 27–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Schön, D. A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York: Ingram Publisher Services US, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Schön, D. A. (1992), ‘Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation’, Research and Engineering Design, 3:3, pp. 3–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-G.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Secundo, G., Del Vecchio, P., Simeone, L. and Schiuma, G. (2020), ‘Creativity and stakeholders’ engagement in open innovation: Design for knowledge translation in technology-intensive enterprises’, Journal of Business Research, 119, pp. 272–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Simeone, L., Secundo, G. and Schiuma, G. (2017), ‘Knowledge translation mechanisms in open innovation: The role of design in R&D projects’, Journal of Knowledge Management, 21:6, pp. 1406–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Simons, T., Gupta, A. and Buchanan, M. (2011), ‘Innovation in R&D: Using design thinking to develop new models of inventiveness, productivity and collaboration’, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 17:4, pp. 301–07.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Steptoe, A., Pollard, T. M. and Wardle, J. (1995), ‘Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire’, Appetite, 25:3, pp. 267–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Stubbs, R., Scott, S. and Duarte, C. (2018), ‘Responding to food, environment and health challenges by changing meat consumption behaviours in consumers’, Nutrition Bulletin, 43:2, pp. 125–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Symmank, C. (2019), ‘Extrinsic and intrinsic food product attributes in consumer and sensory research: Literature review and quantification of the findings’, Management Review Quarterly, 69:1, pp. 39–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Szejda, K., Urbanovich, T. and Wilks, M. (2020), ‘Accelerating consumer adoption of plant-based meat: An evidence-based guide for effective practice’, five working papers, Washington, DC: The Good Food Institute.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Tan, L. (2012), ‘Understanding the different roles of the designer in design for social good: A study of design methodology in the Dott 07 (Designs of the Time 2007) projects’, University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom), http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/8454/. Accessed 2 June 2022.
  87. Tuorila, H. and Hartmann, C. (2020), ‘Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods’, Current Opinion in Food Science, 33, pp. 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Underwood, R. L. (2003), ‘The communicative power of product packaging: Creating brand identity via lived and mediated experience’, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11:1, pp. 62–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Vandenbroeck, E. (2021), ‘Entrepreneurship and the plant-based protein transition: A discourse analysis of packaging of Swedish plant-based brands’, master’s thesis, Uppsala: Uppsala University.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Van Loo, E. J., Hoefkens, C. and Verbeke, W. (2017), ‘Healthy, sustainable and plant-based eating: Perceived (mis)match and involvement-based consumer segments as targets for future policy’, Food Policy, 69, pp. 46–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Van Noorden, R. (2015), ‘Interdisciplinary research by the numbers’, Nature, 525:7569, pp. 306–07.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Varela, P., Arvisenet, G., Gonera, A., Myhrer, K. S., Fifi, V. and Valentin, D. (2022), ‘Meat replacer? No thanks! The clash between naturalness and processing: An explorative study of the perception of plant-based foods’, Appetite, 169, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105793.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Verbeke, W., Scholderer, J. and Lähteenmäki, L. (2009), ‘Consumer appeal of nutrition and health claims in three existing product concepts’, Appetite, 52:3, pp. 684–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Von Thienen, J., Meinel, C. and Nicolai, C. (2014), ‘How design thinking tools help to solve wicked problems’, in H. Plattner, C. Meinel and L. Leifer (eds), Design Thinking Research, Berlin: Springer, pp. 97–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Whitney, P. and Nogueira, A. (2020), ‘Cutting cubes out of fog: The whole view of design’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6:2, pp. 129–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Wickham, H. (2016), ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis Using the Grammar of Graphics, New York: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F. and Wood, A. (2019), ‘Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems’, The Lancet, 393:10170, pp. 447–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Wynn, D. C. and Clarkson, P. J. (2018), ‘Process models in design and development’, Research in Engineering Design, 29, pp. 161–202.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Yin, R. K. (2017), Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, Singapore: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00057_1
Loading
Design-led innovation for more plant-based food: An interdisciplinary approach to more consumer-centric product development
International Journal of Food Design 9, 101 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd_00057_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00057_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ijfd_00057_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): co-creation; consumer-centric methodologies; design-led innovation; plant-based; prototyping; sustainable food transition

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error