Opening the gates: Plurality regulation and the public interest | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Digital Media & Policy
  4. Volume 11, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2516-3523
  • E-ISSN: 2516-3531

Abstract

This article sets out the emergent challenges and opportunities for developing effective and ‘future proof’ policy for regulating media plurality. This analysis is carried out against the backdrop of UK authorities’ 2018 public interest test of the proposed merger between 21st Century Fox and Sky, and the latest data on the UK media ownership landscape. That merger review established important precedents for plurality reform, particularly in its acknowledgement that digital intermediaries are not an inherently pluralizing force and that regulatory intervention is needed to prevent concentrations of agenda power, especially at the level of wholesale newsgathering. The article goes on to critically examine the existing regulatory approach to considerations of whether media mergers are in the public interest, especially in the light of mounting evidence of intensifying consolidation within and across news platforms. This article argues that effective plurality reform must start with new legislation that sets out indicative thresholds and detailed guidance on the meaning of plurality sufficiency. This will enable a proper assessment of plurality outside merger activity and could serve as the basis for periodic reviews, enabling regulators to respond effectively to the challenge of new technologies and dynamic market conditions. We also address problems in the plurality measurement framework developed by Ofcom, namely, the inclusion of digital intermediaries as news ‘sources’ in data collection and analysis. In light of findings from the Fox/Sky merger review, a more effective approach would be to reallocate consumption attributed to major intermediaries based on analysis of the actual news sources consumed via those platforms. Far from privileging intermediaries, this approach will provide a more robust basis on which to bring them into the fold of plurality regulation, namely, through the development of plurality standards for algorithm governance. Such an approach also reflects a new reality in which the interplay of gatekeeping and agenda power between traditional media and intermediaries is not a zero-sum game, amidst growing evidence that major intermediaries are serving to consolidate rather than diversify the news offer in favour of incumbent and mostly legacy publishers.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00017_1
2020-06-01
2024-05-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abernathy, P. M.. ( 2016), The Rise of a New Media Baron and the Emerging Threat of News Deserts, Chapel Hill, NC:: Center for Innovation and Sustainability in Local Media and University of North Carolina;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, C.. ( 2009), The Longer Long Tail, London:: Random House Business Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, C. E.. ( 2007), Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett-Jones, O.. ( 2018;), ‘ Can’t afford to tell the truth. ’, London Review of Books, 40:24, pp. 29–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bridgen, A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Why I’m going to war with the BBC. ’, Daily Telegraph, 21 March, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/bbc/11485968/Why-I-am-going-to-war-with-the-BBC.html. Accessed 24 October 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Study: Apple News’s human editors prefer a few major newsrooms. ’, Tow Center , 5 June, https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/study-apple-newss-human-editors-prefer-a-few-major-newsrooms.php. Accessed 5 July 2019.
  7. Cairncross, F.. ( 2019), A Sustainable Future for Journalism, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/779882/021919_DCMS_Cairncross_Review_.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) ( 2018a), A Report on the Anticipated Acquisition by 21st Century Fox, Inc, of Sky Plc, London:: CMA;, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/713920/CMAFoxSky_report_nonconfidential.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) ( 2018b), Anticipated Acquisition by 21st Century Fox, Inc, of Sky Plc: Appendices and Glossary, London:: CMA;, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/714083/CMAFoxSky_appendices_and_glossary_nonconfidential__2_.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Crauford Smith, R., and Tambini, D.. ( 2012;), ‘ Measuring media plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy choices and regulatory challenges. ’, Journal of Media Law, 4:1, pp. 35–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cushion, S.,, Kilby, A.,, Thomas, R.,, Morani, M., and Sambrook, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Newspaper, impartiality and television news: Intermedia agenda-setting during the 2015 UK General Election Campaign. ’, Journalism Studies, 19:2, pp. 162–181.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Department for Culture, Media and Support (DCMS) ( 2014), Media Ownership and Plurality Consultation Report: Government Response to the House of Lords Select Committee on Communications Report in Media Plurality, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/media-ownership-plurality-consultation-report. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Department for Culture, Media and Support (DCMS) ( 2016), A BBC for the Future: A Broadcaster of Distinction, white paper, Cm9242 , London:: DCMS;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Freedman, D.. ( 2014;), ‘ Metrics, models and the meaning of media ownership. ’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20:2, pp. 170–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodman, E.. ( 2014;), ‘ Informational justice as the new media pluralism. ’, London School of Economics media policy project , https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2014/11/19/informational-justice-as-the-new-media-pluralism/19 November. Accessed 5 July 2019.
  16. Harder, R. A.,, Sevenans, J., and Van Aelst, P.. ( 2017;), ‘ Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. ’, International Journal of Press/Politics, 22:3, pp. 275–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Helberger, N.,, Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., and van der Noll, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ Regulating the new information intermediaries as gatekeepers of information diversity. ’, Info, 17:6, pp. 50–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hindman, M.. ( 2018), The Internet Trap: How the Digital Economy Builds Monopolies and Undermines Democracy, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. House of Lords ( 2014), Media Plurality, House of Lords Select Committee on Communications, HL paper 120 , London:: The Stationery Office;, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/120.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Iosifidis, P.. ( 2010;), ‘ Pluralism and concentration of media ownership: Measurement issues. ’, Javnost-the Public, 17:3, pp. 5–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Just, N.. ( 2009;), ‘ Measuring media concentration and diversity: New approaches and instruments in Europe and the US. ’, Media Culture and Society, 31:1, pp. 97–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Karppinen, K.. ( 2013), Rethinking Media Pluralism, New York:: Fordham University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Khan, L.. ( 2016;), ‘ Amazon’s antitrust paradox. ’, Yale Law Journal, 126:3, pp. 710–805.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Leveson, B.. ( 2012), An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press: Executive Summary, London:: The Stationery Office;, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc1213/hc07/0779/0779.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mayhew, F.. ( 2016;), ‘ Sun and Mail named in Council of Europe report claiming tabloids push hate. ’, Press Gazette, 7 October, https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/sun-and-mail-named-in-european-commission-report-claiming-tabloids-push-hate-speech/. Accessed 24 October 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mayhew, F.. ( 2019;), ‘ UK local newspaper closures: Net loss of 245 titles since 2005, new Press Gazette research. ’, Press Gazette, 11 February, https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/more-than-40-local-news-titles-closed-in-2018-with-loss-of-some-editorial-275-jobs-new-figures-show/. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Media Reform Coalition ( 2015), Who Owns the UK Media?, London:: Media Reform Coalition;, https://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Who_owns_the_UK_media-report_plus_appendix1.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Media Reform Coalition ( 2019), Who Owns the UK Media?, London:: Media Reform Coalition;, https://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/FINALonline2.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Monbiot, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ Press gang. ’, Monbiot , 16 June, http://www.monbiot.com/2017/06/16/press-gang/. Accessed 5 July 2019.
  30. Moore, M., and Tambini, D.. (eds) ( 2018), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Napoli, P. M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Exposure diversity reconsidered. ’, Journal of Information Policy, 1, pp. 246–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Napoli, P. M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Digital intermediaries and the public interest in standard in algorithm governance. ’, London School of Economics Media Policy Project , 6 July, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/80242/1/Digital%20intermediaries%20and%20the%20public%20interest%20standard%20in%20algorithm%20governance%20_%20LSE%20Media%20Policy%20Project.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
  33. Nechushtai, E., and Lewis, S. C.. ( 2019;), ‘ What kind of news gatekeepers do we want machines to be? Filter bubbles, fragmentation, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic recommendations. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 90, pp. 298–307.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Nunez, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Want to know what Facebook really thinks of journalists? Here’s what happened when it hired some. ’, Gizmodo , 3 May, http://gizmodo.com/want-to-know-what-facebook-really-thinks-of-journalists-1773916117. Accessed 5 July 2019.
  35. Ofcom ( 2010), Report on Public Interest Test of the Proposed Acquisition of British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc by News Corporation, London:: Ofcom;, https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/81413/public-interest-test-report.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Ofcom ( 2012), Measuring Media Plurality, London:: Ofcom;, http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/measuring-plurality/letters/advice.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ofcom ( 2015), Measurement Framework for Media Plurality, London:: Ofcom;, http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/media-plurality-framework/summary/Media_plurality_measurement_framework.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Ofcom ( 2018a), The Operation of the Media Ownership Rules Listed under Section 391 of the Communications Act 2003: Ofcom’s Report to the Secretary of State, London:: Ofcom;, https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0030/127929/Media-ownership-rules-report-2018.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ofcom ( 2018b), News Consumption in the UK: 2018, London:: Ofcom;, https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/116529/news-consumption-2018.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pew Research ( 2013;), ‘ The role of news on Facebook: Common yet incidental. ’, 24 October, https://www.journalism.org/2013/10/24/the-role-of-news-on-facebook/. Accessed 5 July 2019.
  41. Schlosberg, J.. ( 2016), Media Ownership and Agenda Control: The Hidden Limits of the Information Age, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Schlosberg, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Digital agenda setting: Re-examining the role of platform monopolies. ’, in M. Moore, and D. Tambini. (eds), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 202–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Schmidt, A. L.,, Zollo, F.,, Del Vicario, M.,, Bessi, A.,, Scala, A.,, Caldarelli, G.,, Eugene Stanley, H., and Quattrociocchi, W.. ( 2017;), ‘ Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook. ’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114:12, pp. 3035–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Stacey, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Elizabeth Warren vows to break up Amazon, Google and Facebook. ’, Financial Times, 8 March, https://www.ft.com/content/29e9a7f8-41b6-11e9-b896-fe36ec32aece. Accessed 24 October 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sweney, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Netflix has revolutionised television: But is its crown starting to slip?. ’, The Guardian, 21 July, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jul/21/netflix-crown-beginning-to-slip-subscriber-numbers. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Tobitt, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ The Sun overtakes Mail online to become UK’s biggest online news brand, latest Comscore data shows. ’, Press Gazette, 18 May, https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/the-sun-overtakes-mail-online-to-become-uks-biggest-online-newspaper-brand-latest-comscore-data-shows/. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Tobitt, C.. ( 2019;), ‘ BBC puts focus on improving public perception around its news impartiality for upcoming year. ’, Press Gazette, 28 March, https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/bbc-puts-focus-on-improving-audience-perception-of-impartiality-in-news-annual-plan/. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Valcke, P.,, Picard, R., and Sukosd, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ A global perspective on media pluralism and diversity. ’, in P. Valcke,, M. Suskosd, and R. Picard. (eds), Media Pluralism and Diversity, pp. 1–19. London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Waterson, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Scores of UK radio stations to lose local programmes. ’, The Guardian, 26 February, https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/feb/26/scores-of-uk-radio-stations-to-lose-local-programmes. Accessed 5 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Webster, J. G., and Ksiazek, T. B.. ( 2012;), ‘ The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. ’, Journal of Communication, 62:1, pp. 39–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, T.. ( 2018), The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age, New York:: Columbia Global Reports;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Schlosberg, Justin, and Freedman, Des. ( 2020;), ‘ Opening the gates: Plurality regulation and the public interest. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 11:2, pp. 115–132, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00017_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00017_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): digital news; media ownership; media plurality; media policy; media regulation; platforms

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error