Ecology of site-specific painting and drawing: Embodied and empathic mark-making in urban cites

References

1. Abram, David. ( 1996), The Spell of the Sensuous, New York:: Vintage Books;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Art Term ( n.d.;), ‘ Site-specific. ’, Tate, https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/s/site-specific. Accessed 10 July 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bourriaud, Nicholas. ( 2002), Relational Aesthetics, Dijon:: Les Presses du reel;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carlson, Allen. ( 1998;), ‘ Environmental aesthetics. ’, in The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York:: Taylor and Francis;, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/environmental-aesthetics/v-1. Accessed 25 March 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carruthers, Beth. ( 2006;), ‘ Mapping the terrain of contemporary eco-art practice and collaboration. ’, in B. Carruthers. (ed.), Art in Ecology – A Think Tank on Arts and Sustainability, Vancouver:: (Commissioned by) UNESCO;, p. 8.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cataldi, Sussane L., and Hamrick, William. (eds) ( 2007), Merleau-Ponty and Environmental Philosophy: Dwelling on the Landscapes of Thought, Albany, NY:: State University of New York Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crippen, Matthew. ( 2016;), ‘ Intuitive cities: Pre-reflective, aesthetic and political aspects of urban design. ’, Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 3:2, pp. 125–45.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crippen, Matthew, and Klement, Vladan. ( 2020;), ‘ Architectural values, political affordances and selective permeability. ’, Open Philosophy, 3:1, pp. 462–77.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crowther, Paul. ( 2015;), ‘ The poetry of “flesh” or the reality of perception? Merleau-Ponty’s fundamental error. ’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23:2, pp. 255–78.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dreyfus, Hubert I., and Dreyfus, Stuart E.. ( 1999;), ‘ The challenge of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment for cognitive science. ’, in G. Weiss, and S. H. Haber. (eds), Perspective of Embodiment, London:: Routledge;, pp. 103–20.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Elkins, James. ( 2008;), ‘ On some limits of materiality in art history. ’, Das Magazin des Instituts für Theorie [Zürich], 31:12, Special Issue: ‘Taktilität: Sinneserfahrung als Grenzerfahrung’ , pp. 25–30.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Giannachi, Gabriella, and Stewart, Nigel. (eds) ( 2006), Performing Nature: Explorations in Ecology and the Arts, Berne:: Peter Lang AG;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gibson, James J.. ( 1972;), ‘ A theory of direct visual perception. ’, in R. Royce, and W. Rozeboom. (eds), Psychology of Knowing, New York:: Gordon & Breach;, pp. 215–36.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gibson, James J.. ( 1973;), ‘ On the concept of “formless invariants” in visual perception. ’, Leonardo, 6:1, pp. 43–45.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gibson, James J.. ( 1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston, MA:: Houghton Mifflin;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gobster, Paul H.,, Nassauer, Joan I.,, Daniel, Terry C., and Fry, Garry. ( 2007;), ‘ The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?. ’, Landscape Ecology, 22:2, pp. 959–72.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Heras-Escribano, Manuel, and De Pinedo-García, Manuel. ( 2018;), ‘ Affordances and landscapes: Overcoming the nature–culture dichotomy through niche construction theory. ’, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, p. 2294.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hobbs, Robert. ( 2001;), ‘ Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology and installation art. ’, in C. Giannini. (ed.), Installations Mattress Factory 1990–1999, Pittsburgh, PA:: University of Pittsburgh Press;, pp. 18–23, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/environmental-aesthetics/v-1. Accessed 4 July 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ingold, Timothy. ( 2007;), ‘ Materials against materiality. ’, Archaeological Dialogues, 14:1, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Keller, David R., and Golley, Frank B.. ( 2002;), ‘ Introduction: ecology as a science of synthesis. ’, in D. R. Keller, and F. B. Golley. (eds), The Philosophy of Ecology: From Science to Synthesis, Athens:: University of Georgia Press;, pp. 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kester, Grant. ( 2005;), ‘ Conversation pieces: The role of dialogue in socially engaged art. ’, in Z. Kocur, and S. Leung. (eds), Theory in Contemporary Art Since 1985, Oxford:: Blackwell;, pp. 76–100.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kwon, Miwon. ( 2000;), ‘ One place after other: Notes on site specificity. ’, in E. Suderberg. (ed.), Situating Installation Art. Space, Site, Intervention, Minnesota, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;, p. 38.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Menatti, Laura, and Heft, Harry. ( 2020;), ‘ Editorial: Changing perspectives on landscape perception: Seeking common ground between the psychological sciences and the humanities. ’, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, p. 159.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ( [1945] 1993;), ‘ Cézanne’s doubt. ’, in G. Johnson. (ed.), The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting (trans. M. Smith.), Evanston, IL:: Northwestern University Press;, pp. 59–75.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ( 1993;), ‘ Eye and mind. ’, in G. Johnson. (ed.), The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, Evanston, IL:: Northwestern University Press;, pp. 121–49.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ( 2007), L’Œil et l’esprit, Paris:: Gallimard;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ( [1945] 2008), Phenomenology of Perception (trans. C. Smith.), New York and London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mitchell, Liz, and Reifenstein, Tilo. ( 2015), Image Matter: Art and Materiality, Manchester, ArtHist.net , 6 November, https://arthist.net/archive/10333. Accessed 25 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Pickett, Steward T. A.,, Cadenasso, Mary L.,, Childers, Daniel L.,, McDonnell, Mark J.,, and Zhou, Weiqi. ( 2016;), ‘ Evolution and future of urban ecological science: Ecology in, of, and for the city. ’, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2:7, p. e01229.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Roy, Sreejata. ( 2014;), ‘ “Networks and Neighbourhood” project report. ’, Khoj Workshop, https://khojworkshop.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/report_networksneighbourhood.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sanders, John T.. ( 1993;), ‘ Merleau-Ponty, Gibson, and the materiality of meaning. ’, Man and World, 26:3, pp. 287–302.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sanders, John T.. ( 1999;), ‘ Affordances: An ecological approach to first philosophy. ’, in G. Weiss, and S. H. Haber. (eds), Perspective of Embodiment, London:: Routledge;, pp. 121–42.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Site-specific art/Environmental art ( n.d.;), ‘ Home page. ’, https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/movement/site-specific-artenvironmental-art. Accessed 15 July 2019.
34. Toadvine, Ted. ( 2016;), ‘ Maurice Merleau-Ponty. ’, in E. N. Zalta. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, , Winter ed.., Stanford, CA:: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy;, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/merleau-ponty/. Accessed 16 March 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Topper, David R.. ( 1983;), ‘ Art in the realist ontology of J.J. Gibson. ’, Synthese, 54:1, pp. 71–83.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Xenakis, Ioannis, and Arnellos, Argyris. ( 2014;), ‘ Aesthetic perception and its minimal content: A naturalistic perspective. ’, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, p. 1038, 19 September, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01038. Accessed 25 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sarkar, Asmita. ( 2021;), ‘ Ecology of site-specific painting and drawing: Embodied and empathic mark-making in urban cites. ’, Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, 10:1, pp. 13–30, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/vi_00023_1
    [Google Scholar]