Distance education as a space of possibility in pandemic-burdened societies | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925

Abstract

Before COVID-19, universal demand for distance education was increasing. During the pandemic, the virtual delivery of public education surged. In turbulent times, citizenship, teaching and learning can present a creative opportunity for fostering online development, high-quality interaction and academic progress. The purpose of this conceptual article is to imagine online learning as a space of possibility for learners in pandemic-burdened societies. The well-known community of inquiry (CoI) framework is described along with its elements of presence – cognitive, social and teaching. In particular, the cognitive element is illustrated with curricular examples attuned to citizenship education. Robust online CoIs allow people to collaborate in a social learning context through dialogue and critical reflection on pivotal issues. The CoI framework offers meaningful learning supported by each of its ‘presences’, which deepen reflection and propel success. Anchored in the CoI model, this original treatment is applicable in theory to participants of all ages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00059_1
2021-06-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N. and Mabry, E. (2002), ‘Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis’, American Journal of Distance Education, 16:2, pp. 8397.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, M., Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J., Titsworth, S. and Burrell. N. (2004), ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis’, Journal of Communication, 54:3, pp. 40220.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. (2020), ‘US News unveils the 2020 best online programs rankings’, US News and World Report, 14 January, https://www.usnews.com/info/blogs/press-room/articles/2020-01-14/us-news-unveils-the-2020-best-online-programs-rankings. Accessed 1 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernard, R. and Abrami, P. (2004), ‘How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature’, Review of Educational Research, 74:3, pp. 379439.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonnicia, L., Maattab, S., Klosec, M., Juliend, H. and Bajjaly, S. (2016), ‘Instructional style and learner-centered approach: A cross-institutional examination of modality preference for online course delivery in a graduate professional program’, Studies in Higher Education, 41:8, pp. 1389407.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crea, T. and Sparnon, N. (2017), ‘Democratizing education at the margins: Faculty and practitioner perspectives on delivering online tertiary education for refugees’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14:43, pp. 119.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Day, B., Lovato, S., Tull, C. and Ross-Gordon, J. (2011), ‘Faculty perceptions of adult learners in college classrooms’, Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59:2, pp. 7784.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dendir, S. (2019), ‘Performance differences between face-to-face and online students in economics’, Journal of Education for Business, 94:3, pp. 17584.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Garrison, D., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000), ‘Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education’, The Internet and Higher Education, 2:2&3, pp. 87105.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Garrison, D., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2010), ‘The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective’, Internet and Higher Education, 13:1&2, pp. 59.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibson, K. (2013), ‘Fostering collaboration and learning in asynchronous online environments’, Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2:2, pp. 6078.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gill, T. and Mullarkey, M. (2015), ‘Taking a case method capstone course online: A comparative case study’, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, pp. 189218.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Helms, J. (2014), ‘Comparing student performance in online and face-to-face delivery modalities’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18:1, pp. 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones, B. (2011), ‘An examination of motivation model components in face-to-face and online instruction’, Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8:3, pp. 91544.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kahu, E., Stephens, C., Leach, L. and Zepke, N. (2013), ‘The engagement of mature distance students’, Higher Education Research & Development, 32:5, pp. 791804.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Keramidas, C. (2012), ‘Are undergraduate students ready for online learning? A comparison of online and face-to-face sections of a course’, Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31:4, pp. 2532.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Legon, R. and Garrett, R. (2017), ‘The Changing Landscape of Online Education (CHLOE)’, Quality Matters & Eduventures Survey of Chief Online Officers, pp. 151, https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/chloe-first-survey-report.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Leong, P. (2011), ‘Role of social presence and cognitive absorption in online learning environments’, Distance Education, 32:1, pp. 528.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MacGillis, A. (2018), ‘How Liberty University built a billion-dollar empire online’, New York Times, 17 April, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/17/magazine/how-liberty-university-built-a-billion-dollar-empire-online.html. Accessed 30 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Marcelo, C. and Yot-Domínguez, C. (2018), ‘From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: Changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43:7, pp. 97588.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mullen, C. A. (2020), ‘Does modality matter? A comparison of aspiring leaders’ learning online and face-to-face’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44:5, pp. 67088.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mullen, C. A. (2021), ‘Online doctoral mentoring in a pandemic: Help or hindrance to academic progress on dissertations?’, International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10:2, pp. 13957.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Newman, D., Johnson, C., Cochrane, C. and Webb, B. (1996), ‘An experiment in group learning technology: Evaluating critical thinking in face-to-face and computer-supported seminars’, Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 4:1, pp. 574.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2019), Framework for 21st Century Learning, pp. 12, http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/p21_framework_brief.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Peacock, S. and Cowan, J. (2017), ‘Towards online student-directed communities of inquiry’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42:5, pp. 67893.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Picciano, A. (2002), ‘Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6:1, pp. 2140.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Romero-Hall, E. and Vicentini, C. (2017), ‘Examining distance learners in hybrid synchronous instruction: Successes and challenges’, Online Learning, 21:4, pp. 14157.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Roux, I. and Nagel, L. (2018), ‘Seeking the best blend for deep learning in a flipped classroom: Viewing student perceptions through the Community of Inquiry lens’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15:16, pp. 128.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Shahabadi, M. and Uplane, M. (2015), ‘Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners’, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, pp. 12938.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor, D., Grant, J., Hamdy, H., Grant, L., Marei, H. and Venkatramana, M. (2020), ‘Transformation to learning from a distance’, MedEdPublish, 9:1, pp. 112, https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000076.1. Accessed 1 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vásquez-Colina, M., Russo, M., Lieberman, M. and Morris, J. (2016), ‘A case study of using peer feedback in face-to-face and distance learning classes among pre-service teachers’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41:4, pp. 50415.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wicks, D., Craft, B., Mason, G., Gritter, K. and Bolding, K. (2015), ‘An investigation into the Community of Inquiry of blended classrooms by a faculty learning community’, Internet and Higher Education, 25, pp. 5362.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H. and Hyde, A. (2012), Best Practice: Bringing Standards to Life in America’s Classrooms, 4th ed., Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mullen, Carol A. (2021), ‘Distance education as a space of possibility in pandemic-burdened societies’, Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 16:2, pp. 22939, https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00059_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00059_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00059_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error