Digital togetherness of Syrian families in Greece

References

1. Alencar, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Refugee integration and social media: A local and experiential perspective. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 21:11, pp. 1588–603, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340500.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anden-Papadopoulos, K., and Pantti, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ The media work of Syrian diaspora activists: Brokering between the protest and mainstream media. ’, International Journal of Communication, 7, pp. 2185–206.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Appadurai, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Aspirational maps: On migrant narratives and imagined future citizenship. ’, Eurozine, 19 February, https://www.eurozine.com/aspirational-maps/. Accessed 28 June 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Appadurai, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Foreword. ’, in T. Thomas,, M.-M. Kruse, and M. Stehling. (eds), Media and Participation in Post Migrant Societies, London:: Rowman and Littlefield;, pp. xi–xiv.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bakardjieva, M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective. ’, Media Culture Society, 25, pp. 291–313.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Balibar, E.. ( 2004), We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Banki, S.. ( 2013;), ‘ The paradoxical power of precarity: Refugees and homeland activism. ’, Refugee Review: Social Movement, 1:1, pp. 1–18.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boellstorff, T.. ( 2008), Coming of Age in Second Life, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boellstorff, T.. ( 2012;), ‘ Rethinking digital anthropology. ’, in H. A. Horst, and D. Miller. (eds), Digital Anthropology, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 39–60.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Butler, J.. ( 2004), Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Butler, J.. ( 2009), Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?, New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cabalquinto, E. C.. ( 2019;), ‘ [Dis]connected households: Transnational family life in the age of mobile internet. ’, in J. Hunsinger,, A. Matthew, and K. Lisbeth. (eds), Second International Handbook of Internet Research, Dordrecht:: Springer;, pp. 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cabot, H.. ( 2014), On the Doorstep of Europe: Asylum and Citizenship in Greece, Philadelphia, PA:: University of Pennsylvania Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cabot, H.. ( 2016;), ‘ “Refugee voices”: Tragedy, ghosts, and the anthropology of not knowing. ’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 45:6, pp. 645–72.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cabot, H.. ( 2019;), ‘ The business of anthropology and the European refugee regime. ’, American Ethnologist, 46:3, pp. 261–75.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chouliaraki, L.. ( 2017;), ‘ Symbolic bordering: The self-representation of migrants and refugees in digital news. ’, Popular Communication, 15:2, pp. 78–94.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dekker, R., and Engbersen, G.. ( 2014;), ‘ How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. ’, Global Networks, 14, pp. 401–18.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dekker, R.,, Engbersen, G., and Faber, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ The use of online media in migration networks. ’, Population, Space and Place, 22, pp. 539–51.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dekker, R.,, Engbersen, G.,, Jeanine, K., and Vonk, H.. ( 2018;), ‘ Smart refugees: How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making. ’, Social Media and Society, 4, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Diminescu, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto. ’, Social Science Information, 47:4, pp. 565–79.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fassin, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ Policing borders, producing boundaries: The governmentality of immigration in dark times. ’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, pp. 213–46.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Giddens, A.. ( 1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gillespie, M.,, Ampofo, L.,, Cheesman, M.,, Faith, B.,, Iliadou, E.,, Issa, A.,, Osseiran, S., and Skleparis, D.. ( 2016;), ‘ Mapping refugee media journeys: Smartphones and social media networks. ’, The Open University/France Medias Monde, 13 May, http://www.open.ac.uk/ccig/sites/www.open.ac.uk.ccig/files/. Accessed 6 October 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gillespie, M.,, Osseiran, S., and Cheesman, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Syrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe: Smartphone infrastructures and affordances. ’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, pp. 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Glazebrook, D.. ( 2004;), ‘ Becoming mobile after detention. ’, Social Analysis, 48:3, pp. 40–58.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Grandi, F.. ( 2016;), ‘ From the high commissioner. ’, in UNHCR (ed.), Connecting Refugees: How Internet and Mobile Connectivity Can Improve Refugee Well-being and Transform Humanitarian Action, Geneva:: UNHCR;, p. 5.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hjorth, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ It’s complicated: A case study of personalisation in an age of social and mobile media. ’, Communication, Politics & Culture, 44:1, pp. 45–59.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Horst, H.. ( 2012;), ‘ New media technologies in everyday life. ’, in H. A. Horst, and D. Miller. (eds), Digital Anthropology, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 61–79.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Horst, H., and Miller, D.. ( 2006), The Cell Phone: An Anthropology of Communication, Oxford:: Berg Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Jacob, K.. ( 2013), Facebook Is My Second Home: The Kurdish Diaspora’s Use of Facebook in Shaping a Nation, Bergen:: University of Bergen;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Khosravi, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ Waiting. ’, in B. Anderson, and M. Keith. (eds), Migration: A COMPAS Anthology, Oxford:: COMPAS;, pp. 74–75.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kozlowska, H.. ( 2015;), ‘ The most crucial item that migrants and refugees carry is a smartphone. ’, Quartz , 14 September, http://qz.com/500062/the-most-crucial-item-that-migrantsand-refugees-carry-is-a-smartphone/. Accessed 28 June 2021.
33. Kunreuther, L.. ( 2006;), ‘ Technologies of the voice: FM radio, telephone, and the Nepali diaspora in Kathmandu. ’, Cultural Anthropology, 21:3, pp. 323–53.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Larkin, B.. ( 2004;), ‘ Piracy, infrastructure, and the rise of a Nigerian video industry. ’, in T. G. Oren, and P. Petro. (eds), Global Currents: Media and Technology Now, New York:: Rutgers University Press;, pp. 159–70.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Larkin, B.. ( 2013;), ‘ The politics and poetics of infrastructure. ’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, pp. 327–43.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Latonero, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ For refugees, a digital passage to Europe. ’, Thomson Reuters News, http://news.trust.org/item/20151227124555-blem7/. Accessed 6 June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Latonero, M., and Kift, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ On digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control. ’, Social Media and Society, 4, January–March, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Leurs, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ The politics of transnational affective capital: Digital connectivity among young Somalis stranded in Ethiopia. ’, Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 5:1, pp. 87–104.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Leurs, K.. ( 2015), Digital Passages: Migrant Youth 2.0: Diaspora, Gender and Youth Cultural Intersections, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Leurs, K., and Ponzanesi, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Connected migrants: Encapsulation and cosmopolitanization. ’, Popular Communication, 16:1, pp. 4–20.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lim, S. L.. ( 2009;), ‘ Loss of connection is death: Transnational family ties among Sudanese refugee families resettling in the United States. ’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40:6, pp. 1028–40.
    [Google Scholar]
42. MacKinnon, R.. ( 2011;), ‘ China’s networked authoritarianism. ’, Journal of Democracy, 22:2, pp. 32–46.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Madianou, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Smartphones as polymedia. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, pp. 667–80.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Madianou, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Doing family at a distance: Transnational family practices in polymedia environments. ’, in L. Hjorth,, H. Horst,. A. Galloway, and G. Bell. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography, London:: Routledge;, pp. 102–12.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Madianou, M., and Miller, D.. ( 2012), Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Madianou, M., and Miller, D.. ( 2013;), ‘ Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. ’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16:2, pp. 169–87.
    [Google Scholar]
47. McKay, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ On the face of Facebook: Historical images and personhood in Filipino social networking. ’, History of Anthropology, 21:4, pp. 483–502.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Miller, D.. ( 2011), Tales from Facebook, Cambridge:: Policy Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Miller, D., and Horst, H. A.. (eds) ( 2012), Digital Anthropology, London and New York:: Berg Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Moss, M. D.. ( 2018;), ‘ The ties that bind: Internet communication technologies, networked authoritarianism, and “voice” in the Syrian diaspora. ’, Globalizations, 15:2, pp. 265–82.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Papailias, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Projecting places: Personal photographs, migration and the technology of (re)location. ’, in P. Carabott,, Y. Hamilakis, and E. Papargyriou. (eds), Camera Graeca: Photographs, Narratives, Materialities, London:: Ashgate Publishing;, pp. 16–22.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Papataxiarchis, E.. ( 2016;), ‘ Being “there”: At the front line of the “European refugee crisis” (part 1). ’, Anthropology Today, 32:2, pp. 5–9.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Parreñas, R. S.. ( 2001a;), ‘ Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. ’, Feminist Studies, 27, pp. 361–90.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Parreñas, R. S.. ( 2001b), Servants of Globalization, Women, Migration and Domestic Work, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Parreñas, R. S.. ( 2005;), ‘ Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. ’, Global Networks, 5:4, pp. 317–36.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Parreñas, R. S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Transnational fathering: Gendered conflicts, distant disciplining and emotional gaps. ’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, pp. 1057–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802230356.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Peterson, M. A.. ( 2015;), ‘ In search of antistructure: The meaning of Tahrir Square in Egypt’s ongoing social drama. ’, in A. Horvath,, B. Thomassen, and H. Wydra. (eds), Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality, Oxford:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 164–82.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ponzanesi, S., and Leurs, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ On digital crossings in Europe. ’, Crossings: Journal of Migration and Culture, 5:1, pp. 3–22.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Robertson, Z.,, Wilding, R., and Gifford, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Mediating the family imaginary: Young people negotiating absence in transnational refugee families. ’, Global Networks, 16:2, pp. 219–36.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Rozakou, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ The biopolitics of hospitality in Greece: Humanitarianism and the management of refugees. ’, American Ethnologist, 39:3, pp. 562–77.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Smets, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ The way Syrian refugees in Turkey use media: Understanding “connected refugees” through a non-mediacentric and local approach. ’, Communications, 43, pp. 113–23, https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0041.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Thomas, M., and Lim, S. S.. ( 2010;), ‘ On maids, mobile phones and social capital: ICT use by female migrant workers in Singapore and its policy implications. ’, in J. Katz. (ed.), Mobile Communication and Social Policy, Trenton, NJ:: Transaction;, pp. 175–90.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Thompson, E. C.. ( 2009;), ‘ Mobile phones, communities and social networks among foreign workers in Singapore. ’, Global Networks, 9:3, pp. 359–80.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Topali, P.. ( 2012;), ‘ Refugees in western societies and in Greece: Representations, body and management of pain. ’, in S. Trumpetta. (ed.), The Refugee and Immigration Issue: Crossings and Border Studies, Athens:: Papazisis;, pp. 97–132.
    [Google Scholar]
65. UNHCR ( 2015;), Syria Regional Refugee Response. , 25 October, https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria/location/5179. Accessed 6 June 2021.
66. UNHCR ( 2016), Connecting Refugees: How Internet and Mobile Connectivity Can Improve Refugee Well-Being and Transform Humanitarian Action, Geneva:: UNHCR;.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Urry, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Social networks, mobile lives and social inequalities. ’, Journal of Transport Geography, 21, pp. 24–30.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Vertovec, S.. ( 2004;), ‘ Cheap calls: The social glue of migrant transnationalism. ’, Global Networks, 4:2, pp. 219–24.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Wall, M.,, Campbell, M. O., and Janbek, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Syrian refugees and information precarity. ’, New Media & Society, 9:2, pp. 240–54.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wilding, R.. ( 2006;), ‘ “Virtual” intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. ’, Global Networks, 6:2, pp. 125–42.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Konstantinou, Iossif. ( 2023;), ‘ Digital togetherness of Syrian families in Greece. ’, Journal of Global Diaspora & Media, 4:1, pp. 65–78, https://doi.org/10.1386/gdm_00034_1
    [Google Scholar]