Skip to content
1981
Migrations, Diasporas and Media
  • ISSN: 2632-5853
  • E-ISSN: 2632-5861

Abstract

Drawing on the highly mediatized arrival of migrants and refugees at the borders of Greece, this article focuses on digital technologies and smartphone use among Syrian refugees in Athens, Greece, and analyses the way family relations are experienced at a distance. It is based on ethnographic research carried out in the refugee camp of Eleonas, from July 2019 to March 2020, when the first wave of COVID-19 was confirmed in Greece. The main objective of the article is to discuss the way digital technologies help the refugees to redefine relationships among family members and experience a sense of ‘togetherness’ at a distance. In addition, it aims to describe the changes of the familial ties and the practices of an ‘imaginary family’ through smartphones and network platforms. Overcoming uncertainty, fear and ‘information precarity’ caused by the dataveillance and control of al-Assad’s governmental authorities, Syrian refugees find ways to use smartphone as ‘an essential tool’ to facilitate communication among family members and relatives in homeland or in diaspora in Europe, to share experiences, comments and pictures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/gdm_00034_1
2023-07-13
2024-10-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alencar, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Refugee integration and social media: A local and experiential perspective. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 21:11, pp. 1588603, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340500.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anden-Papadopoulos, K., and Pantti, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ The media work of Syrian diaspora activists: Brokering between the protest and mainstream media. ’, International Journal of Communication, 7, pp. 2185206.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Appadurai, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Aspirational maps: On migrant narratives and imagined future citizenship. ’, Eurozine, 19 February, https://www.eurozine.com/aspirational-maps/. Accessed 28 June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Appadurai, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Foreword. ’, in T. Thomas,, M.-M. Kruse, and M. Stehling. (eds), Media and Participation in Post Migrant Societies, London:: Rowman and Littlefield;, pp. xixiv.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakardjieva, M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective. ’, Media Culture Society, 25, pp. 291313.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Balibar, E.. ( 2004), We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Banki, S.. ( 2013;), ‘ The paradoxical power of precarity: Refugees and homeland activism. ’, Refugee Review: Social Movement, 1:1, pp. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boellstorff, T.. ( 2008), Coming of Age in Second Life, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boellstorff, T.. ( 2012;), ‘ Rethinking digital anthropology. ’, in H. A. Horst, and D. Miller. (eds), Digital Anthropology, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 3960.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, J.. ( 2004), Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler, J.. ( 2009), Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?, New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cabalquinto, E. C.. ( 2019;), ‘ [Dis]connected households: Transnational family life in the age of mobile internet. ’, in J. Hunsinger,, A. Matthew, and K. Lisbeth. (eds), Second International Handbook of Internet Research, Dordrecht:: Springer;, pp. 121.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cabot, H.. ( 2014), On the Doorstep of Europe: Asylum and Citizenship in Greece, Philadelphia, PA:: University of Pennsylvania Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cabot, H.. ( 2016;), ‘ “Refugee voices”: Tragedy, ghosts, and the anthropology of not knowing. ’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 45:6, pp. 64572.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cabot, H.. ( 2019;), ‘ The business of anthropology and the European refugee regime. ’, American Ethnologist, 46:3, pp. 26175.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chouliaraki, L.. ( 2017;), ‘ Symbolic bordering: The self-representation of migrants and refugees in digital news. ’, Popular Communication, 15:2, pp. 7894.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dekker, R., and Engbersen, G.. ( 2014;), ‘ How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. ’, Global Networks, 14, pp. 40118.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dekker, R.,, Engbersen, G., and Faber, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ The use of online media in migration networks. ’, Population, Space and Place, 22, pp. 53951.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dekker, R.,, Engbersen, G.,, Jeanine, K., and Vonk, H.. ( 2018;), ‘ Smart refugees: How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making. ’, Social Media and Society, 4, pp. 111.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Diminescu, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto. ’, Social Science Information, 47:4, pp. 56579.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fassin, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ Policing borders, producing boundaries: The governmentality of immigration in dark times. ’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, pp. 21346.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Giddens, A.. ( 1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gillespie, M.,, Ampofo, L.,, Cheesman, M.,, Faith, B.,, Iliadou, E.,, Issa, A.,, Osseiran, S., and Skleparis, D.. ( 2016;), ‘ Mapping refugee media journeys: Smartphones and social media networks. ’, The Open University/France Medias Monde, 13 May, http://www.open.ac.uk/ccig/sites/www.open.ac.uk.ccig/files/. Accessed 6 October 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gillespie, M.,, Osseiran, S., and Cheesman, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Syrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe: Smartphone infrastructures and affordances. ’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Glazebrook, D.. ( 2004;), ‘ Becoming mobile after detention. ’, Social Analysis, 48:3, pp. 4058.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Grandi, F.. ( 2016;), ‘ From the high commissioner. ’, in UNHCR (ed.), Connecting Refugees: How Internet and Mobile Connectivity Can Improve Refugee Well-being and Transform Humanitarian Action, Geneva:: UNHCR;, p. 5.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hjorth, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ It’s complicated: A case study of personalisation in an age of social and mobile media. ’, Communication, Politics & Culture, 44:1, pp. 4559.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Horst, H.. ( 2012;), ‘ New media technologies in everyday life. ’, in H. A. Horst, and D. Miller. (eds), Digital Anthropology, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 6179.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Horst, H., and Miller, D.. ( 2006), The Cell Phone: An Anthropology of Communication, Oxford:: Berg Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jacob, K.. ( 2013), Facebook Is My Second Home: The Kurdish Diaspora’s Use of Facebook in Shaping a Nation, Bergen:: University of Bergen;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Khosravi, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ Waiting. ’, in B. Anderson, and M. Keith. (eds), Migration: A COMPAS Anthology, Oxford:: COMPAS;, pp. 7475.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kozlowska, H.. ( 2015;), ‘ The most crucial item that migrants and refugees carry is a smartphone. ’, Quartz , 14 September, http://qz.com/500062/the-most-crucial-item-that-migrantsand-refugees-carry-is-a-smartphone/. Accessed 28 June 2021.
  33. Kunreuther, L.. ( 2006;), ‘ Technologies of the voice: FM radio, telephone, and the Nepali diaspora in Kathmandu. ’, Cultural Anthropology, 21:3, pp. 32353.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Larkin, B.. ( 2004;), ‘ Piracy, infrastructure, and the rise of a Nigerian video industry. ’, in T. G. Oren, and P. Petro. (eds), Global Currents: Media and Technology Now, New York:: Rutgers University Press;, pp. 15970.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Larkin, B.. ( 2013;), ‘ The politics and poetics of infrastructure. ’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, pp. 32743.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Latonero, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ For refugees, a digital passage to Europe. ’, Thomson Reuters News, http://news.trust.org/item/20151227124555-blem7/. Accessed 6 June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Latonero, M., and Kift, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ On digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control. ’, Social Media and Society, 4, January–March, pp. 111.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Leurs, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ The politics of transnational affective capital: Digital connectivity among young Somalis stranded in Ethiopia. ’, Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 5:1, pp. 87104.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Leurs, K.. ( 2015), Digital Passages: Migrant Youth 2.0: Diaspora, Gender and Youth Cultural Intersections, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Leurs, K., and Ponzanesi, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Connected migrants: Encapsulation and cosmopolitanization. ’, Popular Communication, 16:1, pp. 420.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lim, S. L.. ( 2009;), ‘ Loss of connection is death: Transnational family ties among Sudanese refugee families resettling in the United States. ’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40:6, pp. 102840.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. MacKinnon, R.. ( 2011;), ‘ China’s networked authoritarianism. ’, Journal of Democracy, 22:2, pp. 3246.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Madianou, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Smartphones as polymedia. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, pp. 66780.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Madianou, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Doing family at a distance: Transnational family practices in polymedia environments. ’, in L. Hjorth,, H. Horst,. A. Galloway, and G. Bell. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography, London:: Routledge;, pp. 10212.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Madianou, M., and Miller, D.. ( 2012), Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Madianou, M., and Miller, D.. ( 2013;), ‘ Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. ’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16:2, pp. 16987.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. McKay, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ On the face of Facebook: Historical images and personhood in Filipino social networking. ’, History of Anthropology, 21:4, pp. 483502.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Miller, D.. ( 2011), Tales from Facebook, Cambridge:: Policy Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Miller, D., and Horst, H. A.. (eds) ( 2012), Digital Anthropology, London and New York:: Berg Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Moss, M. D.. ( 2018;), ‘ The ties that bind: Internet communication technologies, networked authoritarianism, and “voice” in the Syrian diaspora. ’, Globalizations, 15:2, pp. 26582.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Papailias, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Projecting places: Personal photographs, migration and the technology of (re)location. ’, in P. Carabott,, Y. Hamilakis, and E. Papargyriou. (eds), Camera Graeca: Photographs, Narratives, Materialities, London:: Ashgate Publishing;, pp. 1622.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Papataxiarchis, E.. ( 2016;), ‘ Being “there”: At the front line of the “European refugee crisis” (part 1). ’, Anthropology Today, 32:2, pp. 59.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Parreñas, R. S.. ( 2001a;), ‘ Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. ’, Feminist Studies, 27, pp. 36190.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Parreñas, R. S.. ( 2001b), Servants of Globalization, Women, Migration and Domestic Work, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Parreñas, R. S.. ( 2005;), ‘ Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. ’, Global Networks, 5:4, pp. 31736.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Parreñas, R. S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Transnational fathering: Gendered conflicts, distant disciplining and emotional gaps. ’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, pp. 105772, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802230356.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Peterson, M. A.. ( 2015;), ‘ In search of antistructure: The meaning of Tahrir Square in Egypt’s ongoing social drama. ’, in A. Horvath,, B. Thomassen, and H. Wydra. (eds), Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality, Oxford:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 16482.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Ponzanesi, S., and Leurs, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ On digital crossings in Europe. ’, Crossings: Journal of Migration and Culture, 5:1, pp. 322.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Robertson, Z.,, Wilding, R., and Gifford, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Mediating the family imaginary: Young people negotiating absence in transnational refugee families. ’, Global Networks, 16:2, pp. 21936.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Rozakou, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ The biopolitics of hospitality in Greece: Humanitarianism and the management of refugees. ’, American Ethnologist, 39:3, pp. 56277.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Smets, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ The way Syrian refugees in Turkey use media: Understanding “connected refugees” through a non-mediacentric and local approach. ’, Communications, 43, pp. 11323, https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0041.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Thomas, M., and Lim, S. S.. ( 2010;), ‘ On maids, mobile phones and social capital: ICT use by female migrant workers in Singapore and its policy implications. ’, in J. Katz. (ed.), Mobile Communication and Social Policy, Trenton, NJ:: Transaction;, pp. 17590.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Thompson, E. C.. ( 2009;), ‘ Mobile phones, communities and social networks among foreign workers in Singapore. ’, Global Networks, 9:3, pp. 35980.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Topali, P.. ( 2012;), ‘ Refugees in western societies and in Greece: Representations, body and management of pain. ’, in S. Trumpetta. (ed.), The Refugee and Immigration Issue: Crossings and Border Studies, Athens:: Papazisis;, pp. 97132.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. UNHCR ( 2015;), Syria Regional Refugee Response. , 25 October, https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria/location/5179. Accessed 6 June 2021.
  66. UNHCR ( 2016), Connecting Refugees: How Internet and Mobile Connectivity Can Improve Refugee Well-Being and Transform Humanitarian Action, Geneva:: UNHCR;.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Urry, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Social networks, mobile lives and social inequalities. ’, Journal of Transport Geography, 21, pp. 2430.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Vertovec, S.. ( 2004;), ‘ Cheap calls: The social glue of migrant transnationalism. ’, Global Networks, 4:2, pp. 21924.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wall, M.,, Campbell, M. O., and Janbek, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Syrian refugees and information precarity. ’, New Media & Society, 9:2, pp. 24054.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Wilding, R.. ( 2006;), ‘ “Virtual” intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. ’, Global Networks, 6:2, pp. 12542.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Konstantinou, Iossif. ( 2023;), ‘ Digital togetherness of Syrian families in Greece. ’, Journal of Global Diaspora & Media, 4:1, pp. 6578, https://doi.org/10.1386/gdm_00034_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/gdm_00034_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error