Green living and the social media connection: The relationship between different media use types and green lifestyle politics among young adults | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2632-2463
  • E-ISSN: 2632-2471

Abstract

Today, environmental issues are not only communicated by traditional mass media, but they are also posted, shared and discussed in social media. This raises the question of the extent to which social media use also influences real environmental engagement. Using original survey data collected among young adults in Germany, this study demonstrates that social media use is clearly associated with stronger engagement in green lifestyle politics. Further, regarding different motives and forms of social media use, the findings of the study show that active use of social media for informational purposes predicts green lifestyle politics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00005_1
2020-01-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jem/1/1/jem.1.1.33.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00005_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arlt, Dorothee,, Hoppe, Imke,, Schmitt, Josephine B.,, Silva-Schmidt, Fenja De, and Brüggemann, Michael. ( 2018;), ‘ Climate engagement in a digital age: Exploring the drivers of participation in climate discourse online in the context of C21. ’, Environmental Communication, 12:1, pp. 8498.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arlt, Dorothee,, Hoppe, Imke, and Wolling, Jens. ( 2011;), ‘ Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. ’, International Communication Gazette, 73:1&2, pp. 4563.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beierlein, Constanze,, Kemper, Christoph J.,, Kovaleva, Anastassyia, and Rammstedt, Beatrice. ( 2014;), ‘ Political efficacy Kurzskala. ’, ZIS Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen , https://zis.gesis.org/skala/Beierlein-Kemper-Kovaleva-Rammstedt-Political-Efficacy-Kurzskala-(PEKS). Accessed 28 October 2018.
  4. Bennett, W. Lance. ( 1998;), ‘ The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. ’, Political Science and Politics, 31:4, p. 74061.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett, W. Lance. ( 2012;), ‘ The personalization of politics. ’, ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644:1, pp. 2039.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, W. Lance,, Wells, Chris, and Rank, Allison. ( 2009;), ‘ Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. ’, Citizenship Studies, 13:2, pp. 10520.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bimber, Bruce. ( 2012;), ‘ Digital media and citizenship. ’, in H. Semetko, and M. Scammell. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication, London:: SAGE;, pp. 11526.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boulianne, Shelley. ( 2018;), ‘ Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political participation. ’, Communication Research, 8, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boulianne, Shelley, and Theocharis, Yannis. ( 2018;), ‘ Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. ’, Social Science Computer Review, 19:1, pp. 117.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Center for Research on Environmental Decisions ( 2009), The Psychology of Climate Change Communication, New York:: Center for Research on Environmental Decisions;, http://guide.cred.columbia.edu/pdfs/CREDguide_full-res.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Connolly, John, and Prothero, Andrea. ( 2008;), ‘ Green consumption. ’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 8:1, pp. 11745.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cox, Robert. ( 2013), Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere, Los Angeles, CA:: SAGE;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dispensa, Jaclyn Marisa, and Brulle, Robert J.. ( 2003;), ‘ Media’s social construction of environmental issues: Focus on global warming. A comparative study. ’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23:10, pp. 74105.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Giddens, Anthony. ( 1991), Modernity and Self-Identity, Cambridge:: Polity;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gotlieb, Melissa R., and Cheema, Sadia E.. ( 2017;), ‘ From consumer to producer: Motivations, internet use, and political consumerism. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 20:4, pp. 57086.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grob, Alexander. ( 1995;), ‘ A structural model of environmental attitudes and behaviour. ’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15:3, pp. 20920.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haenfler, Ross,, Johnson, Brett, and Jones, Ellis. ( 2012;), ‘ Lifestyle movements: Exploring the intersection of lifestyle and social movements. ’, Social Movement Studies, 11:1, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haider, Jutta. ( 2016;), ‘ The shaping of environmental information in social media: Affordances and technologies of self-control. ’, Environmental Communication, 10:4, pp. 47391.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halkier, Bente. ( 1999;), ‘ Consequences of the politicization of consumption: The example of environmentally friendly consumption practices. ’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1:1, pp. 2541.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ho, Shirley S.,, Liao, Youqing, and Rosenthal, Sonny. ( 2015;), ‘ Applying the theory of planned behavior and media dependency theory: Predictors of public pro-environmental behavioral intentions in Singapore. ’, Environmental Communication, 9:1, pp. 7799.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Holbert, R. Lance,, Kwak, Nojin, and Shah, Dhavan V.. ( 2003;), ‘ Environmental concern, patterns of television viewing, and pro-environmental behaviors. ’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47:2, pp. 17796.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hölig, Sascha, and Hasebrink, Uwe. ( 2018), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018: Ergebnisse für Deutschland, Hamburg:: Hans-Bredow-Institut;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Inglehart, Ronald. ( 1977), The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Joosse, Sofie, and Brydges, Taylor. ( 2018;), ‘ Blogging for sustainability: The intermediary role of personal green blogs in promoting sustainability. ’, Environmental Communication, 12:5, pp. 686700.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kollmuss, Anja, and Agyeman, Julian. ( 2002;), ‘ Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. ’, Environmental Education Research, 8:3, pp. 23960.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kruikemeier, Sanne,, van Noort, Guda van,, Vliegenthart, Rens, and Vreese, Claes de. ( 2014;), ‘ Unraveling the effects of active and passive forms of political Internet use: Does it affect citizens’ political involvement?. ’, New Media & Society, 16:6, pp. 90320.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kvaløy, Berit,, Finseraas, Henning, and Listhaug, Ola. ( 2012;), ‘ The publics’ concern for global warming: A cross-national study of 47 countries. ’, Journal of Peace Research, 49:1, pp. 1122.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lorenzen, Janet A.. ( 2012;), ‘ Going green: The process of lifestyle change. ’, Sociological Forum, 27:1, pp. 94116.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Luhmann, Niklas. ( 1989), Ecological Communication, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Messing, Solomon, and Westwood, Sean J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Selective exposure in the age of social media. ’, Communication Research, 41:8, pp. 104263.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Micheletti, Michele, and Stolle, Dietlind. ( 2012;), ‘ Vegetarianism – A lifestyle politics?. ’, in M. Micheletti, and A. S. McFarland. (eds), Creative Participation: Responsibility-Taking in the Political World, Boulder, CO:: Paradigm Publishers;, pp. 12545.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Östman, Johan. ( 2012;), ‘ Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. ’, New Media & Society, 14:6, pp. 100421.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Östman, Johan. ( 2014;), ‘ The influence of media use on environmental engagement: A political socialization approach. ’, Environmental Communication, 8:1, pp. 92109.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Park, Chang Sup. ( 2015;), ‘ Pathways to expressive and collective participation: Usage patterns, political efficacy, and political participation in social networking sites. ’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59:4, pp. 698716.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Portwood-Stacer, Laura. ( 2012;), ‘ Anti-consumption as tactical resistance: Anarchists, subculture, and activist strategy. ’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 12:1, pp. 87105.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Preisendörfer, Peter. ( 1999), Umwelteinstellungen und Umweltverhalten in Deutschland (Environmental awareness and environmental behaviour in Germany), Wiesbaden:: VS;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Scherhorn, Gerhard,, Haas, Hendrik,, Hellenthal, Frank, and Seibold, Sabine. ( 2014;), ‘ Naturverträgliches Handeln. ’ (‘Pro-environmental behaviour’), ZIS Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen , https://zis.gesis.org/skala/Scherhorn-Haas-Hellenthal-Seibold-Naturvertr%C3%A4gliches-Handeln. Accessed 28 October 2018.
  38. Schulz, Winfried. ( 2003;), ‘ Mediennutzung und Umweltbewusstsein: Dependenz- und Priming-Effekte. ’ (‘Media use and environmental awareness: Dependence and priming effects’) , Publizistik, 48:4, pp. 387413.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stolle, Dietlind, and Micheletti, Michele. ( 2013), Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Valenzuela, Sebastián,, Arriagada, Arturo, and Scherman, Andrés. ( 2012;), ‘ The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. ’, Journal of Communication, 62:2, pp. 299314.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Whitmarsh, Lorraine, and O’Neill, Saffron. ( 2010;), ‘ Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. ’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30:3, pp. 30514.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Leissner, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ Green living and the social media connection: The relationship between different media use types and green lifestyle politics among young adults. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:1, pp. 3357, doi: 10.1386/jem_00005_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00005_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00005_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error