Abandoned aquariums: Online animal attractions during quarantine | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 1 Number Supplement 1
  • ISSN: 2632-2463
  • E-ISSN: 2632-2471

Abstract

In this article, I argue that popular online animal videos during the coronavirus pandemic are emblematic of the political stakes of animal documentary in the era of climate change. Conceived in response to James Leo Cahill’s ‘A YouTube bestiary: Twenty-six theses on a post-cinema of animal attractions’, I claim a broad public is currently navigating its hopes and fears over an oncoming posthuman future through differing deployments of what Cahill calls the ‘animal attractions’ of online videos. Comparing several recent examples, I analyse these images as documents of an era defined by interactions between humans and nonhumans (such as zoonotic diseases like COVID-19) and as fabulist visions of a future without human beings. Here, emptied aquariums embody the concerns of our current historical moment, evoking anxieties over environmental degradation and speculation about our unknown future.

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC). To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00026_1
2020-06-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jem/1/s1/jem.1.supp.5.1_Schultz-Figueroa.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00026_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexander, N., and Kerr, B.. ( 2020;), ‘ Animals strike curious poses. ’, Real Life, 7 May, https://reallifemag.com/animals-strike-curious-poses/. Accessed 12 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anon. ( 2020;), ‘ Penguins openly explore aquarium closed due to coronavirus. ’, Guardian News, 17 March, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVfTGFBJ8a8&feature=emb_title. Accessed 13 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger, J.. ( [1980] 1991;), ‘ Why look at animals?. ’, in About Looking, New York:: Vintage International Press;, pp. 328.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berland, J.. ( 2019), Virtual Menageries: Animals as Mediators in Network Cultures, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bresson, R.. ( 1966), Au Hasard Balthazar, France:: Cinema Ventures;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Broglio, R.. ( 2011), Surface Encounters: Thinking with Animals and Art, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, S. J.. ( 2020;), ‘ Humans are not the virus – Don’t be an eco-fascist. ’, Wear Your Voice, 27 March, https://wearyourvoicemag.com/humans-are-not-the-virus-eco-fascist/?fbclid=IwAR1UekxoC3fIYo9b9VfdVSoLSy9nXcylsPjN0uAR1maqz9yO4_AEDs09-BA. Accessed 12 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cahill, J. L.. ( 2015;), ‘ A YouTube bestiary: Twenty-six theses on a post-cinema of animal attractions. ’, in K. Groo, and P. Flaig. (eds), New Silent Cinema, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 26393.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Epic Laughs ( 2018;), ‘ Epic wild animals attack Epic zoo animals attack (full) [Epic Laughs]. ’, 18 January, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X6y255nQfA. Accessed 26 April 2020.
  10. Farzan, A. N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Penguins toured an aquarium that closed because of coronavirus concerns: The videos were exactly what we needed. ’, Washington Post, 17 March, https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/03/17/penguins-coronavirus-shedd-aquarium/. Accessed 13 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hess, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ The rise of the coronavirus nature genre. ’, New York Times, 17 April, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/17/arts/coronavirus-nature-genre.html. Accessed 12 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ingram, D.. ( 2004), Green Screen: Environmentalism and Hollywood Cinema, Representing American Culture, Exeter:: University of Exeter Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lippit, A. M.. ( 2002;), ‘ The death of an animal. ’, Film Quarterly, 56:1, pp. 922.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Paravel, V., and Castaing-Taylor, L.. ( 2012), Leviathan, United States:: Cinema Guild;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pettman, D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Netflix and chills: On digital distraction during the global quarantine. ’, Boundary 2, 29 April, http://www.boundary2.org/2020/04/dominic-pettman-netflix-and-chills-on-digital-distraction-during-the-global-quarantine/. Accessed 12 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Robinson, K. S.. ( 2020;), ‘ The coronavirus and our future. ’, The New Yorker, 1 May, https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/the-coronavirus-and-our-future. Accessed 12 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shedd Aquarium (@shedd_aquarium) ( 2020;), ‘ Wellington, meet the belugas!. ’, Twitter, 30 March, https://twitter.com/shedd_aquarium/status/1244743245588021250. Accessed 30 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Shukin, N.. ( 2009), Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times (Posthumanities), Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sobchack, V. C.. ( 1997), Screening Space: The American Science Fiction Film, , 2nd ed.., New Brunswick, NJ:: Rutgers University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vint, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ The animals in that country. ’, Science Fiction Studies, 35:2, pp. 17788.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schultz-Figueroa, Benjamin. ( 2020;), ‘ Abandoned aquariums: Online animal attractions during quarantine. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:Supplement, pp. 5.15.8, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00026_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00026_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00026_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): animal studies; climate change; film studies; memes; YouTube; zoos
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error