Archiving (lost) nature: Hybrid experiences and memorization through participatory digital archives | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Environmental Media
  4. Volume 3, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2632-2463
  • E-ISSN: 2632-2471

Abstract

A growing group of nature enthusiasts share observations of flora and fauna through participatory online platforms. These ‘citizen science’ data are valuable for research and policy, but the value of these platforms goes beyond this: they provide opportunities to stimulate experiences with nature and remember nature that has been lost. Waarneming.nl is the largest nature observation platform in the Netherlands, with over 70,000 users contributing data on biodiversity through their website and mobile applications. Using Waarneming.nl as an example, the theoretical exploration in this article offers a new lens to look at platforms for nature observations. Users of Waarneming.nl read and write digital traces of encounters with other species, creating a ‘hybrid experience’ of nature, where digital and physical information are intertwined. As physical experiences become scarcer in threatening times of species endangerment and extinction, Waarneming.nl should additionally be understood as a place to memorialize lost nature. By conceptualizing Waarneming.nl as a digital (‘place of memories’) and a place where hybrid experiences of nature are inspired, this article reflects on the positive and negative consequences of such platforms for humans and their multispecies relationships.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00090_1
2023-03-10
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altrudi, S.. ( 2021;), ‘ Connecting to nature through tech? The case of the iNaturalist app. ’, Convergence, 27:1, pp. 124–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Archambault, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Taking love seriously in human–plant relations in Mozambique: Toward an anthropology of affective encounters. ’, Cultural Anthropology, 31:2, pp. 244–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aristeidou, M.,, Scanlon, E., and Sharples, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 74, pp. 246–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arts, K.,, van der Wal, R., and Adams, W. M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Digital technology and the conservation of nature. ’, Ambio, 44, Suppl 4, pp. 661–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Assmann, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ From Canon and Archive. ’, in J. K. Olick,, V. Vinitzky-Seroussi, and L. Daniel. (eds), The Collective Memory Reader, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 334–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. August, T.,, Harvey, M.,, Lightfoot, P.,, Kilbey, D.,, Papadopoulos, T., and Jepson, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Emerging technologies for biological recording. ’, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 11:3, pp. 731–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Balázs, B.,, Mooney, P.,, Nováková, E.,, Bastin, L., and Arsanjani, J. J.. ( 2021;), ‘ Data quality in citizen science. ’, in K. Vohland,, A. Land-Zandstra,, L. Ceccaroni,, R. Lemmens,, J. Perelló,, M. Ponti,, R. Samson, and K. Wagenknecht. (eds), The Science of Citizen Science, Cham:: Springer;, pp. 139–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bela, G.,, Peltola, T.,, Young, J. C.,, Balázs, B.,, Arpin, I.,, Pataki, G.,, Hauck, J.,, Kelemen, E.,, Kopperoinen, L.,, van Herzele, A.,, Keune, H.,, Hecker, S.,, Suškevičs, M.,, Roy, H. E.,, Itkonen, P.,, Külvik, M.,, László, M.,, Basnou, C.,, Pino, J., and Bonn, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. ’, Conservation Biology, 30:5, pp. 990–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Blom, I.. ( 2016;), ‘ Rethinking social memory: Archives, technology and the social. ’, in T. Lundemo,, E. Røssaak, and I. Blom. (eds), Memory in Motion: Archives, Technology, and the Social, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;, pp. 11–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bond, L.,, Craps, S., and Vermeulen, P.. ( 2017;), ‘ Introduction: Memory on the move. ’, in L. Bond,, S. Craps, and P. Vermeulen. (eds), Memory Unbound: Tracing the Dynamics of Memory Studies, New York:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 1–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowker, G. C.. ( 2005), Memory Practices in the Sciences, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Butler, J.. ( 2004), Precarious Life: The Power of Mourning and Violence, New York:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cosquer, A.,, Raymond, R., and Prevot-Julliard, A. C.. ( 2012;), ‘ Observations of everyday biodiversity: A new perspective for conservation?. ’, Ecology and Society, 17:4, http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04955-170402.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Craps, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Climate change and the art of anticipatory memory. ’, Parallax, 23:4, pp. 479–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Danielsen, F.,, Burgess, N. D., and Balmford, A.. ( 2005;), ‘ Monitoring matters: Examining the potential of locally-based approaches. ’, Biodiversity & Conservation, 14, pp. 2507–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dickinson, J., and Bonney, R.. ( 2012), Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Follett, R., and Strezov, V.. ( 2015;), ‘ An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. ’, PLoS ONE, 10:11, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Frith, J.. ( 2015), Smartphones as Locative Media, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ganzevoort, W.,, van den Born, R. J. G.,, Halffman, W., and Turnhout, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Sharing biodiversity data: Citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations. ’, Biodiversity and Conservation, 26:12, pp. 2821–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Greenwood, J. D.. ( 2007;), ‘ Citizens, science and bird conservation. ’, Journal of Ornithology, 148, pp. 77–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Haskins, E.. ( 2015;), ‘ The September 11 digital archive: Archival memory and popular participation. ’, in Popular Memories: Commemoration, Participatory Culture, and Democratic Citizenship, Columbia, SC:: University of South Carolina Press;, pp. 44–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Heise, U. K.. ( 2016), Imagining Extinction, Chicago, IL:: The University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoskins, A.. ( 2009;), ‘ The mediatization of memory. ’, in K. Lundby. (ed.), Mediatization of Communication, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 661–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaplan, A. E.. ( 2005), Trauma Culture: The Politics of Terror and Loss in Media and Literature, New Brunswick, NJ:: Rutgers University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuntsman, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ From digital solutionism to materialist accountability: The urgency of new interventions. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:1, pp. 15–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Landsberg, A.. ( 2003;), ‘ Prosthetic memory: The ethics and politics of memory in an age of mass culture. ’, in P. Grainge. (ed.), Memory and Popular Film, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;, pp. 144–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lorimer, J.. ( 2015), Wildlife in the Anthropocene, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller-Rushing, A.,, Primack, R., and Bonney, R.. ( 2012;), ‘ The history of public participation in ecological research. ’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10:6, pp. 285–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Müller, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Between lived and archived memory: How digital archives can tell history. ’, Digithum, 19, pp. 11–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Nixon, R.. ( 2011), Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Nora, P.. ( 1989;), ‘ Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire. ’, Representations, 26, pp. 7–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Nora, P.. ( 1997), Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Preece, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Citizen science: New research challenges for human–computer interaction. ’, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32:8, pp. 585–612.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Rigney, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Cultural memory studies: Mediation, narrative, and the aesthetic. ’, in A. L. Tota, and T. Hagen. (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies, London:: Routledge;, pp. 65–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Rose, D. B., and van Dooren, T.. ( 2011;), ‘ Unloved others: Introduction. ’, Australian Humanities Review, 50, pp. 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Schwartz, J. M., and Cook, T.. ( 2002;), ‘ Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. ’, Archival Science, 2:1, pp. 1–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sharma, N.,, Greaves, S.,, Siddharthan, A.,, Anderson, H. B.,, Robinson, A.,, Colucci-Gray, L.,, Wibowo, A. T.,, Bostock, H.,, Salisbury, A.,, Roberts, S.,, Slawson, D., and van der Wal, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ From citizen science to citizen action: Analysing the potential for a digital platform to cultivate attachments to nature. ’, Journal of Science Communication, 18:1, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010207.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Skarlatidou, A.,, Hamilton, A.,, Vitos, M., and Haklay, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ What do volunteers want from citizen science technologies? A systematic literature review and best practice guidelines. ’, Journal of Science Communication, 18:1, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010202.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, J.. ( 2020;), ‘ The ecopoetical potential of a citizen science audio database: Uploading John Clare to Xeno-canto. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:2, pp. 245–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. de Souza e Silva, A.. ( 2006;), ‘ From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. ’, Space and Culture, 9:3, pp. 261–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. de Souza e Silva, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Location-aware mobile technologies: Historical, social and spatial approaches. ’, Mobile Media and Communication, 1:1, pp. 116–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sturken, M.. ( 1997), Tangled Memories: The AIDS Epidemic, the Vietnam War, and the Politics of Remembering, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. ten Bos, R.. ( 2017), Dwalen in Het Anthropoceen, Amsterdam:: Boom;.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Tsing, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Arts of inclusion, or, how to love a mushroom. ’, Australian Humanities Review, 50, pp. 5–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Turnbull, J.,, Searle, A., and Adams, W. M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Quarantine encounters with digital animals: More-than-human geographies of lockdown life. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 1:1, pp. 6.1–6.10.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Turnhout, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Following the River Clubtail around: How games and grids transform networks of recording biodiversity and policy. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Nijmegen:: Radboud University;.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. van de Bildt, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ The uses of Facebook for examining collective memory: The emergence of Nasser Facebook groups in Egypt. ’, in L. Bond,, S. Craps, and P. Vermeulen. (eds), Memory Unbound: Tracing the Dynamics of Memory Studies, New York:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 131–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. van Dooren, T.. ( 2022;), ‘ In search of lost snails: Storying the unknown extinctions. ’, Environmental Humanities, 14:1, pp. 89–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. van Kleunen, A.,, Foppen, R., and van Turnhout, C.. ( 2017), Basisrapport Voor de Rode Lijst Vogels 2016 Volgens de Nederlandse en IUCN-Criteria, Nijmegen:: Sovon;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Verma, A.,, van der Wal, R., and Fischer, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Imagining wildlife: New technologies and animal censuses, maps and museums. ’, Geoforum, 75, pp. 75–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Verploegen, H.,, Ganzevoort, W., and van den Born, R.. ( 2021;), ‘ Affordances and tensions in recording bird observations: How coordinators and volunteers perceive and experience citizen science in birding. ’, Journal of Science Communication, 20:2, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20020210.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Waarneming.nl ( n.d.a;), ‘ Mission. ’, https://waarneming.nl/pages/mission/. Accessed 25 February 2022.
  53. Waarneming.nl ( n.d.b;), ‘ Statistics. ’, https://waarneming.nl/stats/. Accessed 25 February 2022.
  54. Whitelaw, M., and Smaill, B.. ( 2020;), ‘ Biodiversity data as public environmental media: Citizen science projects, national databases and data visualizations. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 2:1, pp. 79–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilkinson, C.,, Waitt, G., and Gibbs. L.. ( 2014;), ‘ Understanding place as “home” and “away” through practices of bird-watching. ’, Australian Geographer, 45:2, pp. 205–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Winter, J.. ( 1997;), ‘ Review of Nora, Pierre Realms of Memory. ’, H-Net Reviews, http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=1354%0A%0A. Accessed 20 August 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Youatt, R.. ( 2008;), ‘ Counting species: Biopower and the global biodiversity census. ’, Environmental Values, 17:3, pp. 393–417.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Yusoff, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ Aesthetics of loss: Biodiversity, banal violence and biotic subjects. ’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37:4, pp. 578–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Verploegen, Helen. ( 2022;), ‘ Archiving (lost) nature: Hybrid experiences and memorization through participatory digital archives. ’, Journal of Environmental Media, 3:2, pp. 273–92, https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00090_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00090_1
Loading
Archiving (lost) nature: Hybrid experiences and memorization through participatory digital archives
Journal of Environmental Media 3, 273 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00090_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00090_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00090_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): biodiversity loss; citizen science; encounters; multispecies relationships; online platforms; remembering

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error